Advertisement

External Effects of Metropolitan Innovation on Firm Survival: Non-Parametric Evidence from Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing and Healthcare Services

  • Alexandra TsvetkovaEmail author
  • Jean-Claude Thill
  • Deborah Strumsky
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In the last two decades, geography came into prominence as an important consideration in the study of knowledge accumulation, firm performance, and economic growth. The role of space as a determinant of economic outcomes comes primarily from the non-uniform distribution of human and social capital across territories. Accumulated knowledge, specific in each region, eventually should translate into productive applications and lead to dissimilar rates of economic growth (Ibrahim et al. 2009). The literature argues that knowledge, innovativeness, and entrepreneurship (factors that in the short-run are ‘attached’ to a region) play a definite role in economic outcomes.

Keywords

Knowledge Spillover Creative Destruction Firm Survival Patent Count Firm Creation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acs ZJ, Anselin L, Varga A (2002) Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res Policy 31:1069–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs ZJ, Armington C, Zhang T (2007) The determinants of new-firm survival across regional economies. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):367–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acs ZJ, Plummer L, Sutter R (2009) Penetrating the knowledge filter in “rust belt” economies. Ann Reg Sci 43(3):989–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams JD, Jaffe A (1996) Bounding the effects of R&D: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. Rand J Econ 27(4):700–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agarwal R, Sarkar M, Echambadi R (2002) The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: an industry life cycle approach. Acad Manage J 45(5):971–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch D (1995) Innovation, growth and survival. Int J Ind Organ 13:441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosma N, Stam E, Schutjens V (2011) Creative destruction and regional productivity growth: evidence from the Dutch manufacturing and services industries. Small Bus Econ 36(4):401–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bottazzi L, Peri G (2003) Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data. Eur Econ Rev 47(4):687–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Change 10(4):975–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brixy U, Grotz R (2007) Regional patterns and determinants of birth and survival of new firms in Western Germany. Entrep Reg Dev: Int J 19(4):293–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broekel T, Brenner T (2011) Regional factors and innovativeness: an empirical analysis of four German industries. Ann Reg Sci 47(1):169–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buss TF, Lin X (1990) Business survival in rural America: a three state study. Growth Change 21(3):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassia L, Colombelli A, Paleari S (2009) Firms’ growth: does the innovation system matter? Struct Change Econ Dyn 20(3):211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cleves M, Gutierrez R, Gould W, Marchenko Y (2010) An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  15. Elandt-Johnson R, Johnson N (1999) Survival models and data analysis, vol 74. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Fertala N (2008) The shadow of death: do regional differences matter for firm survival across native and immigrant entrepreneurs? Empirica 35:59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feser EJ (2002) Tracing the sources of local external economies. Urban Stud 39(13):2485–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fotopoulos G, Louri H (2000) Location and survival of new entry. Small Bus Econ 14:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritsch M, Brixy U, Falck O (2006) The effect of industry, region, and time on new business survival – a multi-dimensional analysis. Rev Ind Organ 28:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (2002) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(1):125–152Google Scholar
  21. Globerman S, Shapiro D, Vining A (2005) Clusters and intercluster spillovers: their influence on the growth and survival of Canadian information technology firms. Ind Corp Change 14(1):27–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordon I, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud 37(3):513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10:92–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
  25. Headd B (2003) Redefining business success: distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Bus Econ 21:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henderson JV, Shalizi Z, Venables AJ (2001) Geography and development. J Econ Geogr 1(1):81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ibrahim SE, Fallah MH, Reilly RR (2009) Localized sources of knowledge and the effect of knowledge spillovers: an empirical study of inventors in the telecommunications industry. J Econ Geogr 9:405–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knoben J, Oerlemans LAG (2006) Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: a literature review. Int J Manag Rev 8(2):71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koo J (2005) Technology spillovers, agglomeration, and regional economic development. J Plann Lit 20:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehto E (2007) Regional impact of research and development on productivity. Reg Stud 41(5):623–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Littunen H (2000) Networks and local environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms. Small Bus Econ 15:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manjon-Antolın MC, Arauzo-Carod J-M (2008) Firm survival: methods and evidence. Empirica 35:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pakes A, Griliches Z (1980) Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first report. Econ Lett 5(4):377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Renski H (2009) New firm entry, survival, and growth in the United States: a comparison of urban, suburban, and rural areas. J Am Plann Assoc 75(1):60–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Renski H (2011) External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Pap Reg Sci 90(3):473–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodriguez-Pose A, Comptour F (2012) Do clusters generate greater innovation and growth? An analysis of European regions. Prof Geogr 64(2):211–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodriguez-Pose A, Crescenzi R (2008) Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Reg Stud 42(1):51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmutzler A (1999) The new economic geography. J Econ Surv 13(4):355–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott A (2006) Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development: geography and the creative field revisited. Small Bus Econ 26(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Segarra A, Callejón M (2002) New firms’ survival and market turbulence: new evidence from Spain. Rev Ind Organ 20(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorenson O, Audia P (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Am J Sociol 106(2):424–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stephan A (2011) Locational conditions and firm performance: introduction to the special issue. Ann Reg Sci 46(3):487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stough R, Nijkamp P (2009) Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship and economic development. Ann Reg Sci 43(4):835–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strotmann H (2007) Entrepreneurial survival. Small Bus Econ 28(1):87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stuart T, Sorenson O (2003) Geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Res Policy 32(2):229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tödtling F, Wansenböck H (2003) Regional differences in structural characteristics of start-ups. Entrep Reg Dev 15:351–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Uyarra E (2010) What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. J Evol Econ 20(1):115–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang Z, Ma C, Weng G, Wang Y (2004) A study on temporal and regional process of knowledge spillover. Ann Reg Sci 38(4):595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wennberg K, Lindqvist G (2010) The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Bus Econ 34(4):221–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zachariadis M (2003) R&D, innovation, and technological progress: a test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Can J Econ 36(3):566–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Tsvetkova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-Claude Thill
    • 2
  • Deborah Strumsky
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public PolicyGeorge Mason UniversityArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Earth SciencesUniversity of North Carolina – CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations