Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship Across Regions: Does Being a New Industry Make a Difference?

  • Michael WyrwichEmail author
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


Knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) and especially non-technical professional KIBS firms fulfill a cross-divisional function in the knowledge-based development of economies and provide their clients customized, high-value services. Moreover, KIBS produce and diffuse knowledge and oversee markets. Their consultancy support helps firms to exploit their own knowledge potential (e.g., Miles et al. 1995; Muller and Zenker 2001; Wood 2002). Accordingly, understanding where and why KIBS firms locate is helpful in advising policy makers to foster the establishment of knowledge-intensive industries as a prerequisite to designing a knowledge-based economy.


Knowledge Spillover German Democratic Republic Entrepreneurial Opportunity Employment Share Regional Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amend E, Bauer F (2005) Vergleichende Analyse von Länderarbeitsmärkten: Länderstudie Nordrhein-Westfalen, IAB regional Nr. 01/2005. IAB, Nordrhein-WestfalenGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M (2006) Co-location of manufacturing & producer services: a simultaneous equation approach. In: Karlsson C, Johannsson B, Stough R (eds) Entrepreneurship and dynamics in the knowledge economy. Routledge, New York, pp 94–125Google Scholar
  3. Andersson M, Hellerstedt K (2009) Location attributes and start-ups in knowledge-intensive business services. Ind Innov 16:103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechmann S, Dahms V, Fischer A, Frei M, Leber U (2010) 20 Jahre Deutsche Einheit: Ein Vergleich der west- und ostdeutschen Betriebslandschaft im Krisenjahr 2009, IAB-Forschungsbericht 6/2010. IAB, NürnbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Bettencourt LA, Brown SB, Ostrom AL, Roundtree RI (2002) Client co-production in knowledge-intensive business services. Calif Manage Rev 44:100–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boente W, Falck O, Heblich S (2009) The impact of regional age structure on start-up activity. Econ Geogr 85:269–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brezinski H, Fritsch M (1995) Transformation: the shocking German way. Moct-Most 5:1–25Google Scholar
  8. Burda MC, Hunt J (2001) From reunification to economic integration: productivity and the labor market in Eastern Germany. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:1–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlin W (1994) West German growth and institutions: 1945–1990, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper 896. NBER, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Czarnitzki D, Spielkamp A (2003) Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation. Serv Ind J 23:1–30Google Scholar
  11. Den Hertog P (2000) Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. Int J Innov Manag 4:491–528Google Scholar
  12. Fritsch M (2004) Entrepreneurship, entry and performance of new business compared in two growth regimes. J Evolut Econ 14(5):525–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fritsch M, Brixy U (2004) The establishment file of the German social insurance statistics. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 124:183–190Google Scholar
  14. Fritsch M, Falck O (2007) New business formation by industry over space and time: a multidimensional analysis. Reg Stud 41(2):157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fritsch M, Slavtchev V (2010) Determinants of the efficiency of regional innovation systems. Reg Stud. doi: 10.1080/00343400802251494 Google Scholar
  16. Fritsch M, Werker C (1999) Systems of innovation in transition. In: Fritsch M, Brezinski H (eds) Innovation and technological change in Eastern Europe – pathways to industrial recovery. Elgar, Cheltenham/Brookfield, pp 5–22Google Scholar
  17. Glasmeier AK, Howland M (1994) Service-led rural development: definitions theories and empirical evidence. Int Reg Sci Rev 16:197–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goe WR (1990) Producer services, trade and the social division of labour. Reg Stud 24:327–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grupp H, Legler H (2000) Hochtechnologie 2000. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation, Karlsruhe/HannoverGoogle Scholar
  20. Hau H (1998) Privatization under political interference: evidence from Eastern Germany. Eur Econ Rev 42:1177–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hethey T, Schmieder JF (2010) Using worker flows in the analysis of establishment turnover – evidence from German administrative data, FDZ Methodenreport, 06/2010. IAB, NürnbergGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilbe JM (2007) Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt J (2006) Staunching emigration from East Germany: age and the determinants of migration. J Eur Econ Assoc 4:1014–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jennequin H (2008) The evolution of the geographical concentration of tertiary sector activities in Europe. Serv Ind J 28:291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson S, Loveman GW (1995) Starting over in Eastern Europe: entrepreneurship and economic renewal. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeble D, Nachum L (2002) Why do business service firms cluster? Small consultancies, clustering and decentralization in London and southern England. Trans Inst Br Geogr 27:67–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Makun P, MacPherson AD (1997) Externally-assisted product innovation in the manufacturing sector: the role of location, inhouse R&D and outside technical support. Reg Stud 31:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayntz R (1995) Sektorale Unterschiede in der Transformation des Wissenschaftssystems der DDR. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 4:443–453Google Scholar
  29. Miles I, Kastrinos N, Flanagan K, Bilderbeek R, den Hertog P, Huntink W, Bouman M (1995) Knowledge-intensive business services: users, carriers, and source of innovation. PREST, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  30. Muller E, Zenker A (2001) Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Res Policy 30:1501–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pickel A (1992) Radical transitions: the survival and revival of entrepreneurship in the GDR. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  32. Redding SJ, Sturm DM (2008) The costs of remoteness: evidence from German division and reunification. Am Econ Rev 98:1766–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ Sci 11:448–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood PA (2002) Knowledge-intensive services and urban innovativeness. Urban Stud 39:993–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood PA (2005) A service-informed approach to regional innovation – or adaptation? Serv Ind J 25:439–445Google Scholar
  36. Wood PA, Bryson JR, Keeble D (1993) Regional patterns of small firm development in the business services: evidence from the United Kingdom. Environ Plan A 25:677–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wooldridge JA (1999) Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. J Econ 90:77–97Google Scholar
  38. Wyrwich M (2012) Regional entrepreneurial heritage in a socialist and a post-socialist economy. Econ Geogr 88:423–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Business AdministrationFriedrich-Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations