Abstract
What cultural traits could we possibly share with any extraterrestrial civilization? It could be argued that every civilization has to face the same challenge: How to distribute resources between different tasks and/or individuals. Limitations of resources and conflicting interests are likely to be universal problems. In many cases, no perfect solution exists and cultural tradition plays a role in the choice of the allocation procedure. Being simultaneously universal and culturally oriented, the allocation problem is especially suitable as a topic of discussion between civilizations. Two theories attempt to solve the problem of fair resource distribution: equity theory and social choice theory. Both theories are described within a mathematical framework, which eases their translation into interstellar messages. Equitable sharing procedures and electoral procedures are intellectual tools developed to deal with conflicting individual interests for the best outcome for the group at large. Therefore, both equity and social choice theories are products of civilizations seeking to better manage interactions between individuals with selfish tendencies. In such circumstances, altruism should emerge as a prized quality that would be encouraged by extraterrestrial societies, but that is difficult to achieve at the level of individuals due to natural tendencies for selfishness. Therefore, social choice and equity theories are topics of discussion that should provide common ground for communication with any civilization that is struggling, like we are, to build a fairer society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This definition is so compelling that the ability to select the Condorcet’s winner has become the standard benchmark used to compare election methods.
- 2.
Approval voting was used in the longest living democracy in history, the Republic of Venice, from 1268 to 1797. It is used now by the United Nations as well as by many scientific societies, including the Mathematical Association of America, the American Statistical Association, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
References
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley.
Brams, Steven J., and Alan D. Taylor. 1996. Fair Division: From Cake-cutting to Dispute Resolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brosnan, Sarah F., and Frans B. M. de Waal. 2003. “Monkeys Reject Unequal Pay.” Nature 425:297–299.
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Caritat. 1847 [1782]. “Discours prononcé dans l’Académie Française le jeudi 21 février 1782.” In Oeuvres de Condorcet, Volume 1, edited by A. Condorcet O’Connor and M. F. Arago, 389–415. Paris: Firmin Didot.
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Caritat. 1785. Éssai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité de voix. Paris: De L’Imprimerie Royale.
Conradt, Larissa, and Timothy J. Roper. 2003. “Group Decision-making in Animals.” Nature 421(6919):155–158.
Dahl, Robert A. 1991. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
de Borda, Jean Charles. 1781 [1770]. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences. Accessed January 1, 2013. http://gerardgreco.free.fr/IMG/pdf/MA_c_moire-Borda-1781.pdf.
Dumas, Stéphane. 2011. “A Proposal for an Interstellar Rosetta Stone.” In Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CETI), edited by Douglas A. Vakoch, 403–411. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Dutil, Yvan, and Stéphane Dumas. 1998. “Active SETI: Targets Selection and Message Conception.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society, Austin, Texas, January 9.
Duverger, Maurice. 1951. Les partis politiques. Paris: Colin.
Fehr, Ernst, and Urs Fischbacher. 2003. “The Nature of Human Altruism.” Nature 425:785–791.
Freudenthal, Hans. 1960. LINCOS: Design of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Harrison, Albert A. 1997. After Contact: The Human Response to Extraterrestrial Life. New York: Plenum.
Harrison, Albert A. 2013. “Cosmic Evolution, Reciprocity, and Interstellar Tit for Tat.” In Extraterrestrial Altruism, edited by Douglas A. Vakoch, 3–22. Heidelberg: Springer.
McConnell, Brian. 2001. Beyond Contact: A Guide to SETI and Communicating with Alien Civilizations. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Merrill, Samuel, III. 1984. “A Comparison of Efficiency of Multialternative Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 28(1):23–48.
Ollongren, Alexander. 2012. Astrolingistics: Design of a Linguistic System for Interstellar Communication Based on Logic. New York: Springer.
Puxley, Phil. 1997. “Execution of Queue-scheduled Observations with the Gemini 8 m Telescopes.” In SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 3112, Telescope Control Systems II, edited by Hilton Lewis, 234–245.
Reijnierse, J. Hans, and Jos A. M. Potters. 1998. “On Finding an Envy-free Pareto Optimal-Division” Mathematical Programming 83(2):291–311.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762. Du contrat social, ou Principes du droit politique. Amsterdam: M. M. Rey.
Wilson, Stephen J. 1998. Fair Division Using Linear Programming. Preprint. Ames, IA: Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dutil, Y. (2014). Equity and Democracy: Seeking the Common Good as a Common Ground for Interstellar Communication. In: Vakoch, D. (eds) Extraterrestrial Altruism. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37750-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37750-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37749-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37750-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)