Advertisement

Measuring Linearity of Closed Curves and Connected Compound Curves

  • Paul L. Rosin
  • Jovanka Pantović
  • Joviša Žunić
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7726)

Abstract

In this paper we define a new linearity measure for closed curves. We start with simple closed curves which represent the boundaries of bounded planar regions. It turns out that the method can be extended to closed curves which self-intersect and also to certain configurations consisting of several curves, including open curve segments. In all cases, the measured linearities range over the interval (0,1], and do not change under translation, rotation and scaling transformations of the considered curve. In addition, the highest possible linearity (which is 1) is reached if and only if the measured curve consists of two overlapping (i.e. coincident) straight line segments. The new linearity measure is theoretically well founded and all related statements are supported with rigorous mathematical proofs.

Keywords

Closed Curve Linearity Measure Shape Descriptor Straight Line Segment Closed Curf 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gautama, T., Mandić, D., Van Hulle, M.: A novel method for determining the nature of time series. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51, 728–736 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stojmenović, M., Nayak, A., Žunić, J.: Measuring linearity of planar point sets. Pattern Recognition 41, 2503–2511 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Žunić, J., Rosin, P.: Measuring linearity of open planar curve segments. Image Vision Computing 29, 873–879 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benhamou, S.: How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal’s path: Straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension. Journal of Theoretical Biology 229, 209–220 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klette, R., Rosenfeld, A.: Digital Geometry. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andreu, G., Crespo, A., Valiente, J.: Selecting the toroidal self-organizing feature maps (tsofm) best organized to object recognition. In: Int. Conf. Neural Networks, vol. 2, pp. 1341–1346 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flusser, J., Suk, T.: Pattern recognition by affine moment invariants. Pattern Recognition 26, 167–174 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haralick, R.: A measure for circularity of digital figures. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 4, 394–396 (1974)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Proffitt, D.: The measurement of circularity and ellipticity on a digital grid. Pattern Recognition 15, 383–387 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peura, M., Iivarinen, J.: Efficiency of simple shape descriptors. In: Arcelli, C., et al. (eds.) Aspects of Visual Form Processing, pp. 443–451. World Scientific (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mollineda, R., Vidal, E., Casacuberta, F.: A windowed weighted approach for approximate cyclic string matching. In: Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, vol. 4, pp. 188–191 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neuhaus, M., Bunke, H.: Edit distance-based kernel functions for structural pattern classification. Pattern Recognition 39, 1852–1863 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daliri, M.R., Torre, V.: Classification of silhouettes using contour fragments. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 113, 1017–1025 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Munich, M., Perona, P.: Visual identification by signature tracking. IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell. 25, 200–217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rangayyan, R., Elfaramawy, N., Desautels, J., Alim, O.: Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast-tumors. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 16, 799–810 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rangayyan, R., Mudigonda, N., Desautels, J.: Boundary modeling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 38, 487–496 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul L. Rosin
    • 1
  • Jovanka Pantović
    • 2
  • Joviša Žunić
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Faculty of Technical SciencesUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  3. 3.Computer ScienceUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations