Skip to main content

From Informal Thought Experiments to Agent-Based Models A Progressive Account of Modeling in the Social Sciences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 8))

Abstract

Thought experiments are widely employed in the social sciences, as many experiments are not affordable or even impossible to execute. Informal thought experiments, which are typical of classical economics, involve vagueness in the inference from their premises. On the other hand, mathematical models lack realism in their assumptions. Agent-based models are a particular kind of thought experiments, which are especially useful when our intuition is dealing with complex phenomena. We will argue that, contrary to mathematical models, agent-based models allow more realistic assumptions. On the other hand, unlike informal thought experiments, the conclusion of a simulation is the result of a strictly deductive procedure. Hence, agent-based models improve the realism of the assumptions of mathematical models, while avoiding the vagueness of informal thought experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a taxonomy of thought experiments, see, for example, Brown and Fehige [2].

  2. 2.

    Interestingly enough, despite their gnoseological commitments, empiricists like Locke and Hume made large use of thought experiments. Think, for example, of Hume’s [6] “missing shade of blue”.

  3. 3.

    For a debate on Friedman’s account, see Mäki [11].

  4. 4.

    For an introduction to agent-base models, see, for example, Tesfatsion [16].

  5. 5.

    For example, this is the position advocated by Epstein [3].

  6. 6.

    A classic study of such adequacy conditions is Ullman-Margalit [17].

  7. 7.

    For a mathematical model of the origins of money, see, for example, Kiyotaki [7]. Examples of agent-based models of the account are Kobayashi [8] and Yasutomi [18].

References

  1. Axelrod, R.: The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, J.R., Feighe, Y.: Thought experiments. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein, J.M.: Agent-based computational models and generative social science. In: Epstein, J.M. (ed.) Generative Social Sciences: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein, J.M.: Remarks on the foundations of agent-based generative social-science. In: Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K.L. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, pp. 1585–1603. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman, M.: The Methodology of Positive Economics Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hume, D.: A Treatise on Human Nature (1740)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kiyotaki, N., Wright, R.: On money as a medium of exchange. J. Polit. Econ. 97, 926–954 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi, M., et al.: Simulation modeling of emergence-of-money phenomenon by doubly structural network. In: Nakamatsu, K. et al. (eds.) New Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol. 199, pp. 585–594. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhn, T.S.: The Essential Tension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mäki, U.: On the Method of Isolation in Economics. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities, vol. 26, pp. 316–351 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mäki, U.: The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Menger, C.: The Origins of Money (1892)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mill, J.S.: On the Definition of Political Economy and on the Method of Investigation Proper to it. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. Batoche Books, Kitchener (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, A.: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sorensen, R.A.: Thought Experiments. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tesfatsion, L.: Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory. In: Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K.L. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, pp. 831–880. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ullman-Margalit, E.: The Emergence of Norms. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yasutomi, A.: The emergence and collapse of money. Phys. D 82(1–2), 180–194 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruggero Rangoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rangoni, R. (2014). From Informal Thought Experiments to Agent-Based Models A Progressive Account of Modeling in the Social Sciences. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics