Models of Moral Cognition

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 8)


This paper is about modeling morality, with a proposal as to the best way to do it. There is the small problem, however, in continuing disagreements over what morality actually is, and so what is worth modeling. This paper resolves this problem around an understanding of the purpose of a moral model, and from this purpose approaches the best way to model morality.


Conscience Moral intuition Moral psychology Model based reasoning 


  1. 1.
    Schopenhauer, A.: The Basis of Morality. (Translated with introduction and notes by A.B. Bullock.) Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London (1903)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stich, S.: Moral philosophy and moral representation. In: Hechter, M., Nadel, L., Michod, R. (eds.) The Origin of Values. Aldine de Gruyer, New York (1993).
  3. 3.
    Andersen, N.: Conscience, recognition, and the irreducibility of difference in Hegel’s conception of spirit. Ideal. Stud. 35(2), 119–136 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisenberg, N.: Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 665–697 (2000). Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    LeDoux, J.: Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron 73, 653–676 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Osman, M.: An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 988–1010 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haidt, J.: The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316, 998–1002 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kauppinen, A.: Intuition and belief in moral motivation. In: Björnsson, G. (ed.) Moral Motivation: Evidence and Relevance. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (in press).
  9. 9.
    Haidt, J.: Morality. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 65–72 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thagard, P., Finn, T.: Conscience: what is moral intuition? In: Bagnoli, C. (ed.) Morality and the Emotions, pp.150–169. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krause, J.: Collective intentionality and the (re)production of social norms: the scope for a critical social science. Philos. Soc. Sci. 42, 323–355 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Young, L., Saxe, R.: Moral universals and individual differences. Emot. Rev. 3(3), 323–324 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cokely, E.T., Feltz, A.: Adaptive variation in judgment and philosophical intuition. Conscious. Cogn. 18, 356–358 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Narvaez, D.: Moral complexity: the fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 163–181 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rashdall, H.: Is Conscience an Emotion? Three Lectures on Recent Ethical Theories. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1914)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rashdall, H.: The Theory of Good and Evil: A Treatise on Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press, London (1924)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singer, P.: Ethics and Intuitions. J. Ethics 9, 331–352 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Magnani, L., Bardone, E.: Distributed morality: externalizing ethical knowledge in technological artifacts. Found. Sci. 13(1), 99–108 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magnani, L.: Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magnani, L.: Semiotic brains and artificial minds. How brains make up material cognitive systems. In: Gudwin, R., Queiroz, J. (eds.) Semiotics and Intelligent Systems Development. Idea Group Inc., Hershey (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haidt, J., Joseph, C.: Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 133, 55–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haidt, J.: The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108(4), 814 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magnani, L.: Understanding Violence. Springer, Dordrecht (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Batson, C.D.: What’s wrong with morality? Emot. Rev. 3, 230–236 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sulmasy, D.: What is conscience and why is respect for it so important? Theor. Med. Bioeth. 29, 135–149 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barsalou, L.W.: Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577–660 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Narvaez, D.: The embodied dynamism of moral becoming: reply to Haidt. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 185–186 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roeser, S.: Intuitions, emotions and gut reactions in decisions about risks: towards a different interpretation of ‘neuroethics’. J. Risk Res. 13, 175–190 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kirkman, R.: Through the looking-glass: environmentalism and the problem of freedom. J. Value Inq. 36(1), 29–43 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Haidt, J.: The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. Basic Books, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sun, R.: Duality of the Mind: A bottom-up approach toward cognition. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates (2001)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith, A.: The theory of moral sentiments: Raphael, D.D., Macfie,A.L. (eds.) Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. I. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis (1982).
  33. 33.
    White, J.: Manufacturing morality, a general theory of moral agency grounding computational implementations: the ACTWith model. In: Floares, A. (ed.) Computational Intelligence. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    White, J.: An information processing model of psychopathy and anti-social personality disorders integrating neural and psychological accounts towards the assay of social implications of psychopathic agents. In: Fruili, A.S., Veneto, L.D. (eds.) Psychology of Morality. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    White, J.: Autonomy rebuilt: rethinking traditional ethics towards a comprehensive account of autonomous moral agency. Nat. Intell. 1, 32–39 (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    White, J.: Conscience: toward the mechanism of morality. University of Missouri-Columbia (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    White, J.: Understanding and augmenting human morality, the ACTWith model. In: Magnani, L, Pizzi, C., Carnielli W. (eds.) Studies in Computational Intelligence #314: Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology, pp. 607–620. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kant, I.: The Critique of Practical Reason, (trans. Abbott, T.K. 1788) Pennsylvania State University Electronic Classics Series (2010).
  39. 39.
    King, M.L., Jr.: The other America. (1968)
  40. 40.
    Alexander, T.: John Dewey and the moral imagination: beyond Putnam and Rorty toward a postmodern ethics. Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 29, 369–400 (1993)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fesmire, S.: John Dewey and moral imagination: pragmatism in ethics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (2003)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Young, L., Koenigs, M.: Investigating emotion in moral cognition: a review of evidence from functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Br. Med. Bull. 84, 69–79 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KAISTDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations