GNSS Integer Ambiguity Estimation and Evaluation: LAMBDA and Ps-LAMBDA

  • Bofeng Li
  • Sandra Verhagen
  • Peter J.G. Teunissen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 244)

Abstract

Successful integer carrier-phase ambiguity resolution is crucial for high precision GNSS applications. It includes both integer estimation and evaluation. For integer estimation, the LAMBDA method has been applied in a wide variety of GNSS applications. However, before conducting ambiguity resolution, one needs to infer how reliable the fixed solution is expected to be, as incorrect fixed ambiguity solutions often lead to unacceptable positioning errors. In this paper, two Matlab software tools are introduced for the evaluation and integer estimation: Ps-LAMBDA and an updated version of LAMBDA. Evaluation of the integer solution is based on the ambiguity success rate. Since the success rate is generally difficult to compute, some easy-to-use approximations and bounds are provided by the Ps-LAMBDA software. This success rate tool is valuable not only for inferring whether to fix the ambiguities but also for design and research purposes. For the integer estimation, the new version LAMBDA software provides more options of integer estimation and integer search, including the search-and-shrink strategy. In addition, the ratio test is incorporated to validate the significance of the fixed solution. Using these two software tools together allows for the combined execution of integer estimation and evaluation, thus benefiting multi-frequency, multi-GNSS applications.

Keywords

LAMBDA Ps-LAMBDA Search-and-shrink Ambiguity success rate Ambiguity resolution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was done in the framework of the project 1.01 ‘New Carrier-Phase Processing Strategies for Next Generation GNSS Positioning’ of the Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information. Professor Teunissen is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Federation Fellowship (project No. FF0883188). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J (2001) Global positioning system: theory and practice, 5th edn. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leick A (2004) GPS satellite surveying, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teunissen PJG, Kleusberg A (1998) GPS for geodesy, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the global positioning system applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. J Geophys Res 94:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94 (B4):3949–3966Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teunissen PJG (1993) Least squares estimation of the integer GPS ambiguities. In: Invited lecture, section IV theory and methodology, IAG General Meeting, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teunissen PJG (1999) An optimality property of the integer least-squares estimator. J Geodesy 73(11):587–593MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Jonge PJ, Tiberius CCJM (1996) The LAMBDA method for integer ambiguity estimation: implementation aspects, LGR-Series, No 12. Tech. report, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li B, Teunissen PJG (2011) High dimensional integer ambiguity resolution: A first comparison between LAMBDA and Bernese. J Navig 64:S192–S210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hassibi A, Boyd S (1998) Integer parameter estimation in linear models with applications to GPS. IEEE Trans Sig Process 46(11):2938–2952MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teunissen PJG (1998) Success probability of integer GPS ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping. J Geodesy 72:606–612MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teunissen PJG (2000) ADOP based upper bounds for the bootstrapped and the least-squares ambiguity success rates. Artif Satell 35(4):171–179Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verhagen S (2005) On the reliability of integer ambiguity resolution. Navigation 52(2):99–110Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Euler HJ, Schaffrin B (1991) On a measure for the discernibility between different ambiguity solutions in the static-kinematic GPS-mode. In: Proceedings of Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Surveying, and Remote Sensing, International Association of Geodesy Series, vol 107. pp 285–295Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han S (1997) Quality control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning. J Geodesy 71(6):351–361MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landau H, Euler HJ (1992) On-the-fly ambiguity resolution for precise differential positioning. In: Proceedings of ION GPS-1992, Albuquerque NM, pp 607–613Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tiberius CCJM, De Jonge P (1995) Fast positioning using the LAMBDA method. In Proceedings of DSNS’95, Bergen, Norway, paper no. 30. The Nordic Institute of Navigation, OsloGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang J, Stewart MP, Tsakiri M (1998) A discrimination test procedure for ambiguity resolution on-the-fly. J Geodesy 72(11):644–653MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Teunissen PJG, Verhagen S (2009) The GNSS ambiguity ratio-test revisited: a better way of using it. Surv Rev 41(312):138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG (2006) New global navigation satellite system ambiguity resolution method compared to existing approaches. J Guidance Control Dyn 29(4):981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG (2012) The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut. doi: 10.1007/s10291-012-0299-z Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Teunissen PJG (1998) On the integer normal distribution of the GPS ambiguities. Artif Satell 33(2):49–64Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomsen HF (2000) Evaluation of upper and lower bounds on the success probability. In: Proceedings of ION GPS-2000, Salt Lake City UT, pp 183–188Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verhagen S, Li B, Teunissen PJG (2013) Ps-LAMBDA: ambiguity success rate evaluation software for interferometric applications. Comput Geosci 54:361–376Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG, van der Marel H, Li B (2011) GNSS ambiguity resolution: which subset to fix? IGNSS Symposium 2011, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang X, Yang X, Zhou T (2005) MLAMBDA: a modified LAMBDA method for integer least-squares estimation. J Geodesy 79:552–565MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bofeng Li
    • 1
  • Sandra Verhagen
    • 2
  • Peter J.G. Teunissen
    • 1
  1. 1.GNSS Research Center, Department of Spatial SciencesCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Mathematical Geodesy and PositioningDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Nertherlands

Personalised recommendations