The Catchers in the Rye: Students Model Enterprise Architectures

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 2)

Abstract

We illustrate how graduate students (“the catchers”) are able to model the enterprise architecture of a real organization (“the rye”) by a grid of analysis techniques. These techniques design a model driven architecture, and are easy to learn by students and to understand by enterprise users. The grid includes three levels. The Aggregate Strategic Level (ASL) uses list and matrix models in the domains of information and business processes. ASL schemas are then mapped on a much more detailed Rich Semantic Level (RSL), that is still independent from the underlying technology. Finally, RSL schemas are mapped on executable models, that reflect technology. The illustration is backed by a case study on small-medium enterprise.

Keywords

Enterprise architecture Business architecture Information systems architecture Information requirements analysis Requirements analysis techniques 

References

  1. 1.
    Salinger, J.D. (1951). The catcher in the Rye, Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Open Group. 2009. TOGAF Version 9, The Open Group Architecture Framework, ISBN 978-90-8753-230-7. Document Number G091. Published by The Open Group.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Motta, G., & Pignatelli, G. (2010). From strategic to conceptual information modelling: a method and a case study. Naples: ITaiS.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Motta, G., Barroero, T., Sacco, D. (2012). General Enterprise Framework (GEF): an agile framework to define the business architecture of enterprises, SOLI, Suzhou, China.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, P. (1976). The entity-relationship model-toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golfarelli, M., Maio, D., & Rizzi, S. (1998). The dimensional fact model: a conceptual model for data warehouses. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7(2–3), 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Briol, P. (2008). BPMN, the Business Process Modeling Notation Pocket Handbook, LuLu, ISBN 978-1-4092-0299-8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Debevoise, N.T., Geneva R. (2008). The micro guide to process modeling in BPMN, BookSurge Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4196-9310-6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryan, K.L., Lee, S.S.G., Lee, E.W. (1995). Business Process Management (BPM) standards: a survey. Business Process Management Journal. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 15(5).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Penker, M., Eriksson, H.E. (2000). Business modeling with UML: business patterns at work. New York: Wiley, ISBN 0471295515 .Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bolchini, D., Paolini, P. (2004). Goal-driven requirements analysis for hypermedia-intensive web applications. Requirements Engineering. (9:2), 85–103.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Codd, E. F. (1970). A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM, 13(6), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fowler, M. (2003). UML distilled: a brief guide to the standard object modeling language (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-321-19368-7. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Juric, M.B., Krizevnik, M. (2010). WS-BPEL 2.0 for SOA composite applications with Oracle SOA Suite 11 g. Birmigham: Pack Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ceri, S., Fraternali, P., & Paraboschi, S. (1998). Design principles for data-intensive web sites. ACM Sigmod Record, 27(4), 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choudaha, R. (2008). Competency-based curriculum for a master’s program in Service Science, Management and Engineering (SSME): an online Delphi study, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Denver.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Motta, G., Pignatelli, G. (2010). Information strategy: an analysis framework. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 7(2), 39–46. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    TM Forum, Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM). (2005). The business process framework: for the information and communication industry, Release 6.0.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arts, NRF’s IT Standards Division, www.nrf-arts.org.
  20. 20.
    Bolstorff, P., Rosenbaum, R. (2007). Supply chain excellence: a handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model, (2nd edn). Amacom.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CMMI Guidebook for Acquirers Team. 2007. Understanding and leveraging a supplier’s CMMI efforts: a guidebook for acquirers, software engineering institute, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e dell’Informazione University of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations