Coping with Power of Control: The Role of IS in an Italian Integrated Tariff System

  • Mario Pezzillo Iacono
  • Marcello Martinez
  • Gianluigi Mangia
  • Paolo Canonico
  • Ernesto De Nito
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 2)

Abstract

The study explores the role of the Electronic Ticketing Systems in the Integrated Tariff Systems (ITS), focusing on the relationship between technology and control from the perspective of the Critical IS Research. More specifically our work reflects upon the impact of the “smart card technology” on the process of control and power centralization from the perspective of the ITS meta-organizer. It is for this purpose that a case study of UnicoCampania, an Italian ITS, is analyzed and discussed. We show that UnicoCampania’s power to control the transport operators is not only extended through technology, but also becomes more pervasive and more effective. So the electronic ticketing could be considered an artifact which enabled the power relations within the tariff network, establishing itself as the strength of the process that the drive the network. Our chapter provides an empirical example of the application of critical approach to an Italian local transport system, confirming that the two categories analyzed—political and technological—do not denote a specific and separated belonging.

Keywords

Transport Electronic ticketing Power of control Critical Centralization 

References

  1. 1.
    Mercurio, R., Martinez, M., & Iacono, M. P. (2011). Cambiamento e crisi delle ferrovie regionali in Italia: La difficile ricerca di un modello organizzativo per conciliare interessi pubblici e risorse private nel trasporto pubblico locale. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mangia, G., Iacono, MP., Martinez, M., Canonico, P., Mercurio, R. (2012). The human side of organizational change: Compliance and management control systems in Italian public utilities. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matas, A. (2004). Demand and revenue implications of an integrated public transport policy: The case of Madrid. Transport Reviews, 24, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dargay, J. M., & Pekkarinen, S. (1997). Public transport pricing policy: Empirical evidence of regional bus card systems in Finland. Transportation Research Record, 1604, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canonico, P., De Nito, E., Mangia, G., Mercurio, L., & Iacono, M. P. (2011). Regulation issues in the Italian local transport industry: Aligning transactions and governance structures. Journal of Management and Governance, 15, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canonico, P., De Nito, E., Mangia, G., Mercurio, L., & Iacono, M. P. (2012). Modelli di governance nei servizi pubblici: il trasporto pubblico locale in Italia, Impresa Progetto—Electronic. Journal of Management, 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V. K., & Örni, A. (2008). An empirical investigation of mobile ticketing service adoption in public transportation. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 12, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kvasny, L., & Richardson, H. (2006). Critical research in information systems: Looking forward, looking back. Information Technology and People, 19(3), 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doolin, B. (2002). Enterprise discourse professional identity and the organizational control of hospital clinicians. Organization Studies, 23(3), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doolin, B., & McLeod, L. (2005). Towards critical interpretivism in IS research. In D. Howcroft & E. M. Trauth (Eds.), Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application (pp. 244–271). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Klein, H. K., & Brooke, C. (2008). Exploring the critical research agenda in information systems research. Information Systems Journal, 18(2), 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howcroft, D. (2009). Information system. In M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bednar, P. M. (2000). A contextual integration of individual and organizational learning perspectives as part of IS analysis. Informing Science Journal, 3(3), 145–146.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McLoughlin, I., & Harris, M. (1997). Innovation, organizational change and technology. London: International Thompson Business Paper.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2005). Basic assumptions of the critical research perspectives in information systems. In D. Howcroft & E. Trauth (Eds.), Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application (pp. 19–46). UK, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Avgerou, C., Mansell, R., Quah, D., & Silverstone, R. (2007). The oxford handbook of information and communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: New York Doubleday.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weick, K. E. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancick (Eds.), New directions in organizational behaviour (p. 300). Chicago: St. Clair Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sveningsson, S., & Alvesson, M. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations, 56(10), 1141–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 432–464.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brooke, C. (2002). Critical research in information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martinez, M., & Iacono, M. P. (2012). Dealing with critical IS research: Artifacts, drifts, electronic panopticon and illusions of empowerment. In R. Baskerville, M. De Marco, & P. Spagnoletti (Eds.), Designing organisational systems: An interdisciplinary discourse (pp. 83–102). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ciborra, C. U. (2000). A critical review of the literature on the management of corporate information infrastructure. In C. U. Ciborra (Ed.), From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures (pp. 15–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ciborra, C. U. (2002). The labyrinths of information: Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rajao, R., & Hayes, N. (2009). Conceptions of control and IT artefacts: An institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martinez, M. (2011). ICT, productivity and organizational complementarity. In C. Rossignoli & A. Carugati (Eds.), Emerging themes in information systems and organization studies (pp. 271–281). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Introna, L. D. (1997). Management, information and power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jabar, M. A., Sidi, F., Selamat, M. H., Ghani, A. A. A., & Ibrahim, H. (2009). An investigation into methods and concepts of qualitative research in information system research. Computer and information Science, 2(4), 47–54.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abrate, G., Piacenza, M., & Vannoni, D. (2009). The impact of integrated tariff systems on public transport demand: Evidence from Italy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Piacenza, M., & Carpani, C. (2003). Esperienze di integrazione tariffaria nel trasporto pubblico locale in Italia. Moncalieri, Turin: HERMES Research Report.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mangia, G., De Nito, E., Pezzillo Iacono, M., Canonico, P. (2009). Governance models in the local transport industry: An empirical research on tariff integration systems. Proceedings EIASM, the Naples forum on services: Service-dominant logic, service science and network theory, Capri, Italy.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    D’Atri, A. (2010). Management of the interconnected world. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Revellino, S. (2010). Enabling innovation: Essay on intellectual capital, control, and the ontology of IT artefacts. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Canonico, P., De Nito, E., Mangia, G., Mercurio, R., & Esposito, V. (2009). Interpreting projects: Bureaucratical mechanisms to enforce control or lever for change. Organizacja I Zarzadanie, 3(7), 5–16.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brooke, C. (2009). Critical perspective on information systems. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Myers, M. D., & Klein, H. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 17–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Pezzillo Iacono
    • 1
  • Marcello Martinez
    • 1
  • Gianluigi Mangia
    • 2
  • Paolo Canonico
    • 2
  • Ernesto De Nito
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSecond University of NaplesCapuaItaly
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of Scienze Giuridiche, Storiche, Economiche e SocialiUniversity Magna Græcia of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly

Personalised recommendations