Does ICT Influence Organizational Behaviour? An Investigation of Digital Natives Leadership Potential
It was stated that intense use of ICTs since birth stimulated the development of new skills in a cohort of persons called digital natives. Such skills shall allow them to more easily interact with ICTs compared to the digital immigrants, the cohort of persons that entered in contact with the technologies later in their life. Taking this point of view this paper represents an exploratory study in the investigation of the potential influence of the use of ICTs by digital natives on their organizational behavior. On the basis of a dataset of interest for such purpose, this paper investigates the potential cause/effect relationship between the fact of being digital native and the emotional intelligence, a necessary prerequisite to wield good leadership.
KeywordsEmotional intelligence Digital natives Leadership Fs/QCA
This paper stems from an idea originally discussed with Prof. Alessandro D’Atri, who sadly passed away before he could see it put in practice. The paper awarded the Alessandro D’Atri prize at the ItAIS 2012 conference. The author is thankful for this praise, and wishes to thank Prof. D’Atri for his precious mentoring and support during four years of joint work.
- 1.Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 2.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.Google Scholar
- 3.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9, 1–9.Google Scholar
- 4.Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- 6.MarketWatch. College students boost digital adoption, according to course smart survey, http://www.marketwatch.com/story/college-students-boost-digital-adoption-according-to-coursesmart-survey-2012-05-23.
- 8.Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19, 65–76.Google Scholar
- 10.Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
- 11.Goleman, D. (2004). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review, 82, 82–91.Google Scholar
- 12.Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- 14.Frand, J. L. (2000). The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. Educause Review, 35, 14–24.Google Scholar
- 15.Oblinger, D. T., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 2.1–2.20). North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
- 18.McMahon, M., Pospisil, R. (2005) Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. Proceedings of Ascilite Conference, 421–431. Australia: Brisbane.Google Scholar
- 20.Howe, N., Strauss, W. (2003). Millennials go to College. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 22.Jurkiewicz, C. E. (2000). Generation X and the public employee. Public Personnel Management, 29, 55–74.Google Scholar
- 23.Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2010). Generational difference in work values: A review of theory and evidence. Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 79–96.Google Scholar
- 25.Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- 26.Ragin, C. (2000). No fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar