Library Perceptions of Using Social Software Such as Blogs in the Idea Generation Phase of Service Innovations: Lessons from an Experiment

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 2)

Abstract

This article investigates the use of social software such as blogs to communicate with and to involve users in the idea generation process of service innovations. After a theoretical discussion of user involvement and more specifically user involvement using web-tools with specific focus on blogs, the article reports findings and lessons from a field experiment at a university library. In the experiment, a blog was established to collect service innovation ideas from the library users. The experiment shows that a blog may engage a limited number of users in the idea generation process and generate a useful, but modest amount of ideas.

Keywords

Idea generation Social software Service innovations Blogs Library Experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank employees and the management group at Roskilde University Library for their openness and collaboration. In addition we would like to thank all the colleagues participating to the ICE project (ice-project.dk) for interesting discussions and suggestions. Finally, and especially, we would like to thank the Danish Strategic Research Council for financial support for the ICE project, without which this study would not have been possible.

References

  1. 1.
    Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alam, I., & Perry, C. (2002). A customer-oriented new service development process. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carr, P. L. (2009). From innovation to transformation: A review of the 2006–7 serials literature. Library Resources and Technical Services, 53(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brindley, L. (2006). Re-defining the library. Library Hi Tech, 24(4), 484–495. Bradford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alam, I. (2006). Removing the fuzziness form the fuzzy front-end of service innovations through customer interactions. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 468–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magnusson, P. (2003). Benefits of involving users in service. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(4), 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Prandelli, E., Sawhney, M., & Verona, G. (2008). Collaborating with customers to innovate: Conceiving and marketing products in the networking age. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prandelli, E., Verona, G., & Raccagni, D. (2006). Diffusion of web-based product innovation. California Management, 48(4), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ogawa, S., & Piller, F. T. (2006). Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 65–71.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Schreier, M. (2008). Complementing mass customization toolkits with user communities: How per input improves customer self-design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 546–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeppesen, L. B., & Molin, M. (2003). Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(3), 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Droge, C., Michael, A., Stanko, M. A., & Pollitte, W. A. (2010). Lead users and early adopters on the web: The role of new technology product blogs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newson, A., Houghton, D., & Patten, J. (2009). Blogging and other social media: Exploiting the technology and protecting the enterprise. Farnham: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aharony, N. (2009). Librarians and information scientist in the blogosphere: An exploratory analysis. Library and Information Science Research, 31, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuhn, M. (2007). Interactivity and prioritizing the human: A code of blogging ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(1), 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet changing social life? It seems the more things change, the more they stay the same. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alonzo, M., & Aiken, M. (2004). Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems, 36(3), 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baskerville, R., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A taxonomy of action research method working paper. Copenhagen: Institute of Informatics and Management Accounting, Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Roskilde UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations