Dualism of Selective and Structural Manifestations of Information in Modelling of Information Dynamics

Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 7)

Abstract

Information can be defined in terms of the categorical opposition of one and many, leading to two manifestations of information, selective and structural. These manifestations of information are dual in the sense that one always is associated with the other. The dualism can be used to model and explain dynamics of information processes. Application of the analysis involving selective-structural duality is made in the contexts of two domains, of computation and foundations of living systems. Similarity of these two types of information processing allowing common way of their modelling becomes more evident in the naturalistic perspective on computing based on the observation that every computation is inherently analogue, and the distinction between analogue and digital information is only a matter of its meaning. In conclusion, it is proposed that the similar dynamics of information processes allows considering computational systems of increased hierarchical complexity resembling living systems.

Keywords

Selective and structural information Dynamics of information processing Hierarchic levels of information 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schroeder, M.J.: Philosophical Foundations for the Concept of Information: Selective and Structural Information. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science, Paris (2005), http://www.mdpi.org/fis2005
  2. 2.
    Schroeder, M.J.: An Alternative to Entropy in the Measurement of Information. Entropy 6, 388–412 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schroeder, M.J.: Quantum Coherence without Quantum Mechanics in Modeling the Unity of Consciousness. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5494, pp. 97–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Windelband, W.: Praeludien: Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft, vol. II, pp. 136–160. Tubingen (1924); Engl. transl. Lamiell, J. T.: History and Natural Science. Theory and Psychology 8, 6–22 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pike, K.L.: Emic and Etic Standpoints for the Description of Behavior. In: Pike, K.L. (ed.) Language in Relation to Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior, Mouton, The Hague (1966)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J.: Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 42. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schroeder, M.J.: From Philosophy to Theory of Information. International Journal Information Theories and Applications 18(1), 56–68 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    von Neumann, J.: The General and Logical Theory of Automata. In: Taub, A.H. (ed.) John von Neumann, Collected Works, vol. V. Pergamon Press (1948)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Landauer, R.: Information is Physical. Physics Today. May 23-29 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jauch, J.M.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1968)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shannon, C.E.: A Universal Turing Machine With Two Internal States. In: Shannon, C.E., McCarthy, J. (eds.) Automata Studies, pp. 157–165. Priceton University Press, Princeton (1956)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ashby, W.R.: An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London (1956)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heylighen, F.: Principles of Systems and Cybernetics: an evolutionary perspective. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Cybernetics and Systems 1992, pp. 3–10. World Science, Singapore (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schroeder, M.J.: Concept of Information as a Bridge between Mind and Brain. Information 2(3), 478–509 (2011), http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/2/3/478/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schroeder, M.J.: The Role of Information Integration in Demysti-fication of Holistic Methodology. In: Simeonov, P.L., Smith, L.S., Ehresmann, A.C. (eds.) Integral Biomathics: tracing the Road to Reality. Proceedings of iBioMath 2011-Am, San Jose, CA, USA, iBioMath 2011-Eu, Paris, France and ACIB 2011, Stirling, UK, pp. 79–96. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sato, N.: Scientific Élan Vital: Entropy Deficit or Inhomogeneity as a Unified Concept of Driving Forces of Life in Hierarchical Biosphere Driven by Photosynthesis. Entropy 14, 233–251 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schrödinger, E.: What is Life? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1945)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schroeder, M.J.: Entropy Balance in Climate Changes. In: Proceedings of the 44-th Coal Science Symposium, Akita (October 2007), http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110006611099/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Akita International UniversityAkitaJapan

Personalised recommendations