Advertisement

GNSS Attitude Determination for Remote Sensing: On the Bounding of the Multivariate Ambiguity Objective Function

  • Nandakumaran Nadarajah
  • Peter J. G. Teunissen
  • Gabriele Giorgi
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 139)

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS)-based attitude determination is a viable alternative for traditional methods such as gyroscopes. Precise attitude determination using multiple GNSS antennas mounted on a remote sensing platform relies on successful resolution of the integer carrier phase ambiguities. The Multivariate Constrained (MC-) LAMBDA method has been developed for the multivariate quadratically constrained GNSS attitude model that incorporates the known antenna geometry. In this contribution, it is demonstrated that the currently used easy-to-compute MC-LAMBDA bounding functions are relatively loose bounds that may result in too large integer search times. To mitigate this problem, we develop alternative bounding functions and compare their performance using simulated as well as real data. As a result we are able to identify tighter bounding functions that improve the search algorithms for instantaneous GNSS attitude determination.

Keywords

GNSS Attitude determination Constrained Integer Least-Squares MC-LAMBDA Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution 

References

  1. Cohen C (1992) Attitude determination using GPS. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Crassidis JL, Markley FL (1997) New algorithm for attitude determination using Global Positioning System signals. J Guid Contr Dynam 20(5):891–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giorgi G, Teunissen PJG (2010) Carrier phase GNSS attitude determination with the multivariate constrained LAMBDA method. In: Aerospace conference, 2010. IEEE, New York, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  4. Giorgi G, Teunissen PJG, Buist PJ (2008) A search and shrink approach for the baseline constrained LAMBDA method: experimental results. In: Yasuda A (ed) Proceedings of international symposium on GPS/GNSS. Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo, pp 797–806Google Scholar
  5. Li Y, Zhang K, Roberts C, Murata M (2004) On-the-fly GPS-based attitude determination using single- and double-differenced carrier phase measurements. GPS Solut 8(2):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lin D, Voon L, Nagarajan N (2004) Real-time attitude determination for microsatellite by LAMBDA method combined with Kalman filtering. In: 22nd AIAA international communications satellite systems conference and exhibit 2004, Monterey, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Lu G (1995) Development of a GPS multi-antenna system for attitude determination. Ph.D. Thesis, Engineering Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  8. Madsen J, Lightsey EG (2004) Robust spacecraft attitude determination using global positioning system receivers. J Spacecr Rockets 41(4):635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Markley FL (1988) Attitude determination using vector observations and the singular value decomposition. J Astronaut Sci 36(3): 245–258Google Scholar
  10. Park C, Teunissen PJG (2003) A new carrier phase ambiguity estimation for GNSS attitude determination systems. In: Proceedings of international symposium on GPS/GNSS, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  11. Psiaki ML (2006) Batch algorithm for global-positioning-system attitude determination and integer ambiguity resolution. J Guid Contr Dynam 29(5):1070–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Teunissen PJG (2007) A general multivariate formulation of the multi-antenna GNSS attitude determination problem. Artif Satell 42(2):97–111Google Scholar
  13. Wahba G (1965) Problem 65-1: a least squares estimate of spacecraft attitude. SIAM Rev 7(3):409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nandakumaran Nadarajah
    • 1
  • Peter J. G. Teunissen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gabriele Giorgi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Spatial SciencesGNSS Research Centre, Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS)Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute for Communications and NavigationTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations