Skip to main content

The Integral-Equation-Based Approaches for Modelling the Local Gravity Field in the Remove–Restore Scheme

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Earth on the Edge: Science for a Sustainable Planet

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 139))

Abstract

We study the accuracy of local gravity field modelling using four different types of the integral-equation-based approaches, namely the Poisson integral, Green integral, point-mass, and radial multipole approaches. We investigate how these four discretised integral equations perform when the gravity data are corrected for the residual terrain model (RTM-correction) and for the reference gravity field (remove–restore scheme). All integral equations are discretised below data points at the chosen constant depth relative to the Bjerhammar sphere. The choice of the optimal depth of discretization is done based on minimising the RMS fit between the observed and predicted gravity data. In all four approaches the number of unknown parameters is identical to the number of input gravity data and the systems of discretised integral equations are solved using Jacobi iteration. The regularisation is not applied. The study area in New Zealand comprises a rough part of the Southern Alps in the South Island with flat coastal regions including offshore areas. The results of numerical experiments are presented and discussed. We demonstrate that the application of the RTM-correction to gravity data significantly improves the accuracy of the gravity field approximation when using the Green integral approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdalla A, Tenzer R (2011) The evaluation of the New Zealand’s geoid model using the KTH method. Geod Cartogr 37(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen OB, Knudsen P, Berry P (2009) The DNSC08GRA global marine gravity field from double retraced satellite altimetry. J Geod 84:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberts B, Klees R (2004) A comparison of methods for the inversion of airborne gravity data. J Geod 78:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerhammar A (1962) Gravity reductions to a spherical surface. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerhammar A (1987) Discrete physical geodesy. Report 380. Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbus J, Sirguey P, Tenzer R (2011) A free, fully assessed 15-m DEM for New Zealand. Surv Q 66:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R, Tscherning CC (1997) Topographic effects in gravity modelling for BVP. In: Sanso F, Rummel R (eds) Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid. Lecture notes in Earth sciences, vol 65. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchenko AN (1998) Parameterization of the Earth’s gravity field: point and line singularities. Lviv Astronomical and Geodetical Society, Lviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinec Z (1996) Stability investigations of a discrete downward continuation problem for geoid determination in the Canadian Rocky mountains. J Geod 70:805–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novák P (2003) Geoid determination using one-step integration. J Geod 77:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novák P, Kern M, Schwarz KP, Sideris MG, Heck B, Ferguson S, Hammada Y, Wei M (2003) On geoid determination from airborne gravity. J Geod 76:510–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigber C, Schmidt R, Flechtner F, Konig R, Meyer U, Neumaye KH, Schwintzer P, Zhu SY (2004) An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S. J Geodyn 39(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg LE (2003) A general model of modifying Stokes formula and its least squares solution. J Geod 77:459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenzer R, Klees R (2008) The choice of the spherical radial basis functions in local gravity field modelling. Stud Geophys Geod 52:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenzer R, Klees R, Prutkin I (2012) A comparison of different integral-equation-based approaches for local gravity field modelling – Case study for the Canadian Rocky Mountains. In: Kenyon S, Christina. Pacino M, Marti. Urs (eds) Geodesy for planet Earth: Proceedings of the 2009 IAG symposium, Buenos Aires, 31 August–4 September 2009. IAG symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin (WOS), pp 381–388. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_46. ISBN 978-3-642-20337-4

  • Young D (1971) Iterative solutions of large linear systems. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdalla, A., Tenzer, R. (2014). The Integral-Equation-Based Approaches for Modelling the Local Gravity Field in the Remove–Restore Scheme. In: Rizos, C., Willis, P. (eds) Earth on the Edge: Science for a Sustainable Planet. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 139. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics