Advertisement

Analysis of the Sea Level Change in New Zealand

  • R. TenzerEmail author
  • V. Gladkikh
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 139)

Abstract

We analyse the sea level change in New Zealand using tide-gauge records available for over a century. The least-squares linear regression analysis is applied to estimate the linear and acceleration trends in (annual) mean sea level (MSL) data from tide gauges (TGs) in Auckland, Wellington, Lyttelton and Dunedin. The results reveal that the linear trends in relative sea level at these four TGs are between 1.2 mm/year (TG Dunedin) and 2.1 mm/year (TG Wellington). The relative sea level trend in New Zealand over the last century is estimated to be 1.7 ± 0.1 mm/year. The relative sea level trends are further corrected for the vertical land motions in order to assess the “absolute” sea level rise in New Zealand. The vertical land motions are investigated throughout New Zealand based on the analysis of GPS time series at 101 permanent sites. The GPS solutions are aligned to the ITRF2000 reference frame. The prevailing pattern of vertical motions in New Zealand is dominated by tectonic subsidence in the lower North Island, while the largest tectonic uplift is detected across the central Southern Alps in the South Island. The estimated rates of absolute sea level rise at the four TGs (co-located with GPS) are between 0.4 mm/year (TG Wellington) and 1.8 mm/year (TG Lyttelton). Based on these estimates, the absolute sea level in New Zealand raised over the last century at an average rate of 1.1 ± 0.3 mm/year.

Keywords

GPS Sea level rise Tide-gauge records Vertical land motion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The annual MSL data used in this study were kindly provided by Prof. John Hannah (from the National School of Surveying at the University of Otago). The GPS data used in this study are made available by the New Zealand GeoNet project and its sponsors EQC, GNS Science, and LINZ.

References

  1. Beavan J (2005) Noise properties of continuous GPS data from concrete pillar geodetic monuments in New Zealand and comparison with data from U.S. deep drilled braced monuments. J Geophys Res 110:1–13Google Scholar
  2. Beavan J (2009) Notes about GPS processing and creation of GPS time series. GNS Science, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Beavan J, Blick G (2005) Limitations in the NZGD2000 deformation model. In: Tregoning, Rizos (eds) Dynamic planet. Springer, Berlin, pp 624–630Google Scholar
  4. Beavan J, Haines J (2001) Contemporary horizontal velocity and strain rate fields of the Pacific-Australian plate boundary zone through New Zealand. J Geophys Res 106:741–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beavan J, Moore M, Pearson C, Henderson M, Parsons B, Bourne S, England P, Walcott D, Blick G, Darby D, Hodgkinson K (1999) Crustal deformation during 1994–1998 due to oblique continental collision in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand, and implications for seismic potential of the Alpine fault. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104(B11):25233–25255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beavan J, Tregoning P, Bevis M, Kato T, Meertens C (2002) Motion and rigidity of the Pacific Plate and implications for plate boundary deformation. J Geophys Res 107(B10):ETG 19/1–15Google Scholar
  7. Beavan J, Matheson D, Denys P, Denham M, Herring T, Hager B, Molnar P (2004) A vertical deformation profile across the Southern Alps, New Zealand, from 3.5 years of continuous GPS data. In: Proceedings of the workshop: the state of GPS vertical positioning: separation of earth processes by space geodesy. Cahiers de Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et Seismologie 24:111–123Google Scholar
  8. Beavan J, Ellis S, Wallace L, Denys P (2007) Kinematic constraints from GPS on oblique convergence of the Pacific and Australian Plates, Central South Island, New Zealand. Geophys Monogr 175:75–94Google Scholar
  9. Beavan J, Denys P, Denham M, Hager B, Herring T, Molnar P (2010) Distribution of present-day vertical deformation across the Southern Alps, New Zealand, from 10 years of GPS data. Geophys Res Lett 37:L16305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blewitt G (2004) Fundamental ambiguity in the definition of vertical motion. Cahier du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 23:1–4Google Scholar
  11. Bourne S, Arnadottir T, Beavan J, Darby D, England P, Parsons B, Walcott R, Wood P (1998) Crustal deformation of the Marlborough fault zone in the South Island of New Zealand: geodetic constraints over the interval 1982–1994. J Geophys Res 103:147–165Google Scholar
  12. Bull W, Cooper A (1986) Uplifted marine terraces along the Alpine fault, New Zealand. Science 234:1225–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldwell P (1998) Sea level data processing on IBM-PC compatible computers, version 3.0, JIMAR contribution no. 98–319. Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, Honolulu, 72 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Gladkikh V, Tenzer R (2011) A comparison of model estimates of ocean-tide loading displacements in New Zealand. J Geodetic Sci 1(2):94–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goring DG, Bell RG (1999) El Niño and decadal effects on sea level variability in northern New Zealand: a wavelet analysis. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 33:587–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hannah J (1988) Analysis of mean sea level trends in New Zealand from historical tidal data. Report no. 2, Dept. of Survey and Land Information, Wellington, 41 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Hannah J (1990) Analysis of mean sea level data from New Zealand for the period 1899–1988. J Geophys Res 95(B6):12399–12405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hannah J (2004) An updated analysis of long-term sea level change in . Geophys Res Lett 31:L03307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hannah J (2009) A new updated sea level trend analysis for New Zealand. Report for GNS Science, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Hannah J, Bell RG (2012) Regional sea level trends in New Zealand. J Geophys Res 117:C01004. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007591 Google Scholar
  21. Marinovich Y, Tenzer R (2011) Theoretical deformations of the Earth’s crust induced by the polar motion – a case study of New Zealand. Acta Geodaet Geophys Hung 46(1):39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tenzer R, Gladkikh V, Denys P (2011) Crustal deformations due to the atmospheric pressure loading in New Zealand. J Geodetic Sci 1(3):173–179Google Scholar
  23. Tenzer R, Denys P, Stevenson M (2012) A compilation of preliminary map of the vertical deformations in New Zealand from continuous GPS data. In: Kenyon S, Pacino MC, Marti U (eds) Geodesy for planet Earth: proceedings of the 2009 IAG symposium, Buenos Aires, 31 August–4 September 2009, pp 697–703. IAG symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin (WOS), 1046 pp. ISBN 978-3-642-20337-4Google Scholar
  24. Tippett JM, Kamp PJJ (1993) Fission track analysis of the late Cenozoic vertical kinematics of continental Pacific Crust, South Island, . J Geophys Res 136(B9):16119–16148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wallace LM, Beavan J, McCaffrey R, Darby D (2004) Subduction zone coupling and tectonic rotations in the North Island, New Zealand. J Geophys Res 109, B12406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wallace LM, Beavan J, McCaffrey R, Berryman K, Denys P (2007) Balancing the plate motion budget in the South Island, New Zealand, using GPS, geological and seismological data. Geophys J Int 168(1):332–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wellman H (1979) An uplift map for the South Island of New Zealand, and a model for uplift of the Southern Alps. Bull R Soc N Z 18:13–20Google Scholar
  28. Williams SD, Bock Y, Fang P, Jamason P, Nikolaidis R, Prawirodirdjo LL, Miller M, Johnson DJ (2004) Error analysis of continuous GPS position time series. J Geophys Res 109:B03412Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National School of Surveying, University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations