Advertisement

Improving the Design of Online Applications for Social Benefit through a Behaviour Change Model

  • Kathryn Gough
  • Jillian Hamilton
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7822)

Abstract

Community support agencies routinely employ a web presence to provide information on their services. While this online information provision helps to increase an agency’s reach, this paper argues that it can be further extended by mapping relationships between services and by facilitating two-way communication and collaboration with local communities. We argue that emergent technologies, such as locative media and networking tools, can assist in harnessing this social capital. However, new applications must be designed in ways that both persuade and support community members to contribute information and support others in need. An analysis of the online presence of community service agencies and social benefit applications is presented against Fogg’s Behaviour Model. From this evaluation, design principles are proposed for developing new locative, collaborative online applications for social benefit.

Keywords

Social Capital Social Benefit Locative Medium Community Resilience Online Application 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruns, A.: Social Media vs the Floods, cci.edu.au/about/media/social-media-vs-the-floods
  2. 2.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What we Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fogg, B.J.: A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design (2009), http://www.bjfogg.com
  4. 4.
    Fogg, B.J.: Green Path Behaviour Guide. Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuad-Luke, A.: Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. Earthscan, London (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Price-Robertson, R., Knight, K.: Natural Disasters and Community Resilience: a Framework for Support. Child Family Community Australia paper No.3 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley and Sons, London (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Silva, A.d.S.e., Sutko, D.M.: Theorizing Locative Technologies through Philosophies of the Virtual. Communication Theory 21, 23–42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiksner, G.M., Fogg, B.J., Liu, X.: Six Patterns for Persuasion in Online Social Networks. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 151–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Gough
    • 1
  • Jillian Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Creative IndustriesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations