Skip to main content

Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process for the Choquet Integral

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7811))

Abstract

Interaction between criteria and hierarchical structure of criteria are nowadays two important issues in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Interaction between criteria is often dealt with fuzzy integrals, especially the Choquet integral. To handle the hierarchy of criteria in MCDA, a methodology called Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process (MCHP) has been recently proposed. It permits consideration of preference relations with respect to a subset of criteria at any level of the hierarchy. In this paper, we propose to apply MCHP to the Choquet integral. In this way, using the Choquet integral and the MCHP, it is possible to compare two alternatives not only globally, but also partially, taking into account a particular subset of criteria and the possible interaction between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angilella, S., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research 201(1), 277–288 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chateauneuf, A., Jaffray, J.Y.: Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Möbius inversion. Mathematical Social Sciences 17, 263–283 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Corrente, S., Greco, S., Słowiński, R.: Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process in Robust Ordinal Regression. Decision Support Systems 53(3), 660–674 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Additive representations of non-additive measures and the Choquet integral. Ann. Operational Research 52, 43–65 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 89, 445–456 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabisch, M.: k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 92, 167–189 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 563–604. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. Annals of Operations Research 175(1), 247–290 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research 191(2), 416–436 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. J. Wiley, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marichal, J.L., Roubens, M.: Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research 124(3), 641–650 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Murofushi, T., Soneda, S.: Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (iii): interaction index. In: 9th Fuzzy Systems Symposium, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 693–696 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rota, G.C.: On the foundations of combinatorial theory I. Theory of Möbius functions. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 2, 340–368 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games II, pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sugeno, M., Fujimoto, K., Murofushi, T.: Hierarchical decomposition theorems for Choquet integral models. In: Proceedings-IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 2075–2078 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tzeng, G.H., Ou Yang, C.T., Lin, Y.P., Chen, C.B.: Hierarchical MADM with fuzzy integral for evaluating enterprise intranet web sites. Information Sciences 169(3-4), 409–426 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Słowiński, R. (2013). Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process for the Choquet Integral. In: Purshouse, R.C., Fleming, P.J., Fonseca, C.M., Greco, S., Shaw, J. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7811. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37140-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37140-0_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37139-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37140-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics