Towards Total Budgeting and the Interactive Budget Warehouse

  • Dirk DraheimEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 4)


This paper aims at establishing a strictly information system science viewpoint onto management accounting and budgetary processes. This viewpoint is presented in terms of a strictly subject-oriented, time variant data model—the so-called interactive budget warehouse. The target is to overcome the ERP/ad-hoc planning divide that challenges budgetary planning as well as budgetary control in many of today’s enterprises. With respect to technology we see the need to establish budgetary IT systems that potentially enable a total budget control across all levels down to the smallest cost units we deal with in daily operations. However, total budget control is not the target. We try to characterize a possible sweet spot between the obvious micro management of total budget control and today’s budgeting practices, which we tentatively call total budgeting. Total budgeting is the organizational concept corresponding to a reasonable usage of the interactive budget warehouse. Total budgeting is about commitment to the power of financial flows, pervasive profit and cost awareness, overcoming the budget responsibility-accountability divide, and a tight integration of budgetary control with the overall management system of the enterprise.


Management accounting Beyond budgeting Real-time data warehousing 


  1. 1.
    Otley, D.: Trends in budgetary control and responsibility accounting. In: Bhimani, A. (ed.) Contemporary Issues in Management Accounting, pp. 291–307. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hope, J., Fraser, R.: Beyond Budgeting—How Managers Can Break Free from the Annual Performance Trap. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mintzberg, H.: Mintzberg on Management—Inside our Strange World of Organizations. The Free Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Codd, E.F., Codd, S.B., Salley, C.T.: Providing OLAP to user-analysts: an IT mandate. Technical report. E.F. Codd and Associates (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hyperion: Hyperion System 9 BI + Interactive Reporting, release 9.0—User’s Guide. Hyperion Solutions Corporation (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Browne, D., IBM Cognos Business Intelligence V10.1 Handbook. International Business Machines Corporation IBM, Armonk (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westerman, P.: DataWarehousing—Using theWal-Mart Model. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hansen, S.C., Torok, R.: The Closed Loop: Implementing Activity-Based Planning and Budgeting. Bedford (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thalhammer, T., Schrefl, M., Mohania, M.: Active Data Warehouses: Complementing OLAP with Analysis Rules. Data Knowl. Eng. 39, 241–269 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hahn, B., Ballinger, C.: Tpump in Continuous Environment—Assembling the Teradata Active Data Warehouse Series. Active Data Warehouse Center of Expertise, NCR, Duluth (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Draheim, D.: Business Process Technology—A Unified View on Business Processes Workflows and Enterprise Applications. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Draheim, D.: Smart business process management. In: Fischer, L. (ed.) BPM and Workflow Handbook, Digital Edition 2011. Future Strategies, Workflow Management Coalition, Future Strategies, Lighthouse Point (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weiss, R.: A Technical Overview of the Oracle Exadata Database Machine and Exadata Storage Server. Oracle White Paper. Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores (2012) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chartered Institute of Management Accountants: (2013)
  15. 15.
    Bhimani, A.: Contemporary Issues in Management Accounting, pp. 291–307. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maier, R., Hdrich, T., Peinl, R.: Enterprise Knowledge Infrastructure. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuch, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company—how Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT, Center for Advanced Educational Services, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Theory of the Firm—Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3(4), 305–360 (1976)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ashby, W.R.: Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1(2), 83–91 (1958)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau: Zero-Base Budgeting. Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau Office of Research Background Paper, no. 2 (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beer, S.: The Heart of Enterprise: Companion Volume to—The Brain of the Firm. Wiley, London (1994)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beer, S.: The Brain of the Firm: Companion Volume to—The Heart of Enterprise. Wiley, Chichester (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations