Utilizing Enterprise Resource Planning in Decision-Making Processes

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 4)


This paper reports on findings from a research project investigating Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and its utilization on decision-making processes in Australian organizations. The focus of the study is to reveal if and how the vast amount of data, which is generated by ERP systems, could improve decision-making processes on strategic and tactical levels. The findings are based on data consists of information collected in two phases by semi-structured interviews and survey. Findings from two phases of data collection is used to build a System Dynamics model as an exploratory vehicle to verify findings and formulate practical scenarios to help managers utilizing enterprise systems for their more strategic benefits such as decision-making.


ERP Decision making Decision support systems System dynamics 


  1. 1.
    Davenport, T.: Mission Critical: Realising the Promise of Enterprise Systems. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, K., Hillegersberg, J.: ERP experiences and evolution. Commun. ACM 43, 23–26 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar, V., Maheshwari, B., Kumar, U.: Enterprise resource planning systems adoption process: a survey of Canadian organisations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40, 509–523 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boonstra, A.: Interpreting and ERP implementation project from a stakeholder perspective. Int. J. Project Manage. 24 279–295 (2005) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akkermans, H.A., Bogerd, P., Yücesan, E. and van Wassenhove, L. N.: The impact of ERP on supply chain management: exploratory findings from a European Delphi study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 146 284–301 (2003) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta, M., Kohli, A.: Enterprise resource planning systems and its implications for operations function. Technovation. (2004)
  7. 7.
    Jacobs, F.R., Bendoly, E.: Enterprise resource planning: development and directions for operations management research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 146, 233–240 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Radzicki, M.J., Taylor, R.A.: Origin of system dynamics. Jay W. Forrester and the History of System Dynamics. Retrieved 23 Oct 2008
  9. 9.
    Bingi, P., Sharma, M., Godla, J.: Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Inf. Syst. Manage. 16, 7–14 (1999) (Summer) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.: Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems. Manage. Sci. 42(4), 541–558 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.: Beyond the productivity paradox. Commun. ACM 41(8), 49–55 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buckout, S., Frey, E., Nemec, J.: Making ERP succeed: Turning fear into promise. J. Strategy Bus. 15, 60–72 (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davenport, T.H.: Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Bus. Rev 76, 121–131 (1998) (July/August)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davenport, T.: Mission critical: Realizing the promise of enterprise systems. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houdeshel, G., Watson, H.J.: The Management Information and Decision Support (MIDS) system at Lockheed Georgia. MIS Quarterly 11(1), 128–140 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watson, H.J., Annino, D.A., Wixom, B.H., Avery, K.L., Rutherford, M.: Current practices in data warehousing. Inf. Syst. Manag. 18(1), 47–55 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations