Age Differences in Computer Input Device Use: A Comparison of Touchscreen, Trackball, and Mouse

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 206)

Abstract

This study examined age-related differences in user performance and preference with three computer input devices (mouse, touchscreen, and trackball) among older, middle-aged, and younger adults. Sixty-six participants were recruited and equally split into the three age groups. The results showed that age and input device had significant effect on task completion time and number of error. There were significant age-related performance differences in task completion time among the input devices. Ratings of users’ preference indicated that the older adults preferred trackball to the mouse and touchscreen. Our findings suggest that the touchscreen could moderate only part of the age-related performance differences and conferred limited benefits to older adults. More research efforts are required to examine user characteristics, user perception on the use of the devices, and task requirements before we can determine the benefits of an input device for users in different ages.

Keywords

Age-related difference input device user performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO and US National Institute of Aging: Global health and ageing (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czaja, S., Lee, C.: The Impact of Aging on Access to Technology. Universal Access in the Information Society 5, 341–349 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Czaja, S., Lee, C.: Information Technology and Older Adults. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J. (eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 777–792. Lawrence Erlbaum and Asso, Mahwah (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caprani, N., O’Connor, N.E., Gurrin, C.: Touch Screens for the Older User. In: Auat Cheein, F. (ed.) Assistive Technologies, pp. 95–118 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., McLaughlin, A.C.: Touch a Screen or Turn a Knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job. Human Factors 47(2), 271–288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Card, S.K., English, W.K., Burr, B.J.: Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-controlled Isometric Joystick, Keys, and Text Keys for Text Selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 601–613 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Epps, B.W.: A Comparison of Cursor Control Devices on a Graphics Editing Task. In: The 31st Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA (1987)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackenzie, I.S., Sellen, A., Buxton, W.: A Comparison of Input Device in Elemental Pointing and Dragging Tasks. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Albert, A.: The Effect of Graphic Input Devices on Performance in a Cursor Position Task. In: The 26th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sears, A., Shneiderman, B.: High Precision TouchScreens: Design Strategies and Comparisons With a Mouse. Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud. 34, 593–613 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yau, Y., Hwang, S., Chao, C.: Effects of Input Device and Motion Type on a Cursor-positioning Task. Percept. Mot. Skills 106, 76–90 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Forlines, C., et al.: Direct-touch vs. Mouse Input for Tabletop Displays. In: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walker, N., Philbin, D.A., Fisk, A.D.: Age-Related Differences in Movement Control: Adjusting Submovement Structure to Optimize Performance. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 52, 40–52 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, M., Sharit, J., Czaja, S.: Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks. Human Factors 41, 389–396 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chaparro, A., et al.: The Impact of Age on Computer Input Device Use: Psychophysical and Physiological Measures. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 24, 503–513 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charness, N., et al.: Light Pen Use and Practice Minimize Age and Hand Performance Differences in Pointing Tasks. Human Factors 46, 373–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jastrzembski, T., et al.: Input Devices for Web Browsing: Age and Hand Effects. Universal Access in the Information Society 4, 39–45 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Melenhorst, A., Rogers, W., Bouwhuis, D.: Older Adults’ Motivated Choice for Technological Innovation: Evidence for Benefit-driven Selectivity. Psychol. Aging 21, 190–195 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Systems EngineeringThe University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations