Adopting Standards in Nursing Health Record – A Case Study in a Portuguese Hospital

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 206)

Abstract

The investigation that is described in this paper tried to identify and acknowledge the added value created by the adoption of nursing practice standards, using a study case in a large Portuguese hospital. Following a literature review, five assumptions were proposed. Subsequently, a survey was developed and administered to a nursing staff sample of the hospital under study. Our results revealed that, except for the last, all assumptions were confirmed, leading to the conclusion that the adoption of standards is beneficial for the nursing practice.

Keywords

Nursing Standards Health Information Systems Electronic Health Records 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beck, C., Polit, D.: Fundamentos de Pesquisa em Enfermagem, 7th edn. Artmed (2011) ISBN 9788536325453Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bulechek, G., Butcher, H., Dochterman, J.: Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), 5th edn. MOSBY Elsevier (2008) ISBN 9780323056045Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CHF, Clinical Data Standards Explained. Fact Sheet, California Healthcare Foundation (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho, I., Park, Y.: Evaluation of the Expressiveness of an ICNP-based Nursing Data Dictionary in a Computerized Nursing Record System. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13(4), 456–464 (2006), doi:10.1197/jamia.M1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dolin, R., et al.: HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. Journal of the American Informatics Association 13(1), 30–39 (2006), doi:10.1197/jamia.M1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fortin, M.F.: Fundamentos e Etapas no Processo de Investigação. Lusodidacta (2009) ISBN 9789898075185Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaidzinski, R., et al.: Diagnóstico de Enfermagem na Prática Clínica. Artmed (2008) ISBN 9788536311807Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goehle, J.: Technology of Tomorrow: The Implementation of Electronic Health Records, University of Buffalo (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gonçalves, J., Rocha, A.: A decision support system for quality of life in head and neck oncology patients. Head & Neck Oncology 4(3), 1–9 (2012), doi:10.1186/1758-3284-4-3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Health Affairs, Health Policy Brief. Health Foundation Inc. (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hill, M., Hill, A.: Investigação por Questionário, 2nd edn. Sílabo, Lisboa (2005) ISBN 9726182735Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ICN, International Council of Nurses, ICN (2010), http://www.icn.ch (accessed: November 25, 2011)
  13. 13.
    Leal, M.: A CIPE e a Visibilidade da Enfermagem. Lusociência, Lisboa (2008) ISBN 9789728930202Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lundberg, C., Warren, J., et al.: Selecting a standardized terminology for the electronic health record that reveals the impact of nursing on patient care. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics 12(2) (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lunney, M.: Critical need to address accuracy of nurses’ diagnoses. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 13(1) (2008), doi:10.3912/OJINGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moorhead, S., Johnson, M., Maas, M., Swanson, E.: Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), 4th edn. Elsevier (2008) ISBN 9780323054089Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses: definitions & classification. Willey-Blackwell, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palhares, P.: My PEPWeb: Sistema de Prontuário Electrónico Pessoal através da World Wide Web. Undergraduate Monograph in Computer Science, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rocha, A.: Evolution of Information Systems and Technologies Maturity in Healthcare. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics 6(2), 28–37 (2011), doi:10.4018/jhisi.2011040103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sujansky, W., Chang, S.: The California Clinical Data Project: A Case Study in the Adoption of Clinical Data Standards for Quality Improvement. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 20(3), 71–78 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Von-Krogh, G.: An examination of the NANDA International taxonomy for domain completeness, ontological, homogeneity, and clinical functionality. International Journal of Nursing Terminology and Classification 19(2), 65–75 (2008), doi:10.1111/j.1744-618X.2008.00083.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    WHO, International Classification of Diseases (ICD). World Health Organization (2011), http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/ (accessed: September 14, 2011)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GIMEDUFPPortoPortugal
  2. 2.LIACCUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations