Advertisement

Knowledge Integration in Problem Solving Processes

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 206)

Abstract

This paper analyses the knowledge integration in problem-solving situations which requires a high level of interaction and trust among workers. The literature review explores the main barriers associated to knowledge integration and use; even if most problem situations are solved in an unconscious way, automatically and in a few seconds, others situations requires more time, effort, teamwork, collaboration and extensive abstract knowledge. This research goal is to analyse the perceptions of the workers from Alpha Organisation. The research findings allow us to conclude that, depending on the complexity of the workstation, the Operator decides if he has the knowledge and the tools to solve the problem or if he needs help from Managers. The use and share of employees’ knowledge is an important factor to solve problems and strengthen performance. However, several organisational and individual barriers condition the process.

Keywords

knowledge integration problem solving organisations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McAdam, R., McCreedy, S.: The process of knowledge management within organisations: a critical assessment of both theory and practice. Knowledge and Process Management 6(2), 101–112 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nonaka, I., et al.: SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning 33, 5–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davenport, H.T., Prusak, L.: Working knowledge: how Organisations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post Critical Philosophy, 428 pages. Routledge, London (1958)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coulson-Thomas, C.: Transforming the company, 2nd edn. Kogan Page, London (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Husted, K., Michailova, S.: Diagnosing and fighting knowledge sharing hostility. Organisational Dynamics 31(1), 60–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bock, et al.: Behavioral intention formation knowledge sharing: examining roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organisational climate. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 87–111 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, W.P.: A technology architecture for managing explicit knowledge over the entire lifecycle of large and complex projects. Ark Group Intranet Content Management, 20–21 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nonaka, I.: The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 69(6), 96–111 (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ford, D.P., Staples, D.S.: Perceived value of knowledge: shall I give uou my gem, my coal? In: de Edição, L. (ed.) 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference for Systems Sciences (HICSS-38), Waikoloa, Hawaii. Awarded Best Paper Award for Organisational Systems and Technology: Knowledge Management Track (January 2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willem, et al.: Impact of coherent versus multiple identities on knowledge integration. Journal of Information Science 34, 370–386 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levin, Cross: Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science 50(11), 1477–1490 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, H., Choi, B.: Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organisational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(1), 179–228 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sousa, M.: Dynamic knowledge: An Action Research Project. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management 10(1) (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, D.M.: The Psychology of Thought and Judgment. Harper, New York (1955)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Argyris, C., Schön, D.: Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Addison Wesley, Reading (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cummings, J.N.: Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science 50(3), 352–364 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Billett, S.: Learning throughout working life: Interdependencies at work. Studies in Continuing Education 23(1), 19–35 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wiig, K.M.: Knowledge management has many facets (2003), http://www.krii.com/downloads/fourkmfacets.pdf
  21. 21.
    Piaget, J.: Autobiographie, Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto, vol. 10, pp. 129–159. Droz, Génève (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIEO – Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational DynamicsUAB – Open University of LisbonLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations