From Republicans to Teenagers – Group Membership and Search (GRUMPS)

  • Ingmar Weber
  • Djoerd Hiemstra
  • Pavel Serdyukov
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7814)


In the early years of information retrieval, the focus of research was on systems aspects such as crawling, indexing, and relevancy ranking. Over the years, more and more user-related information such as click information or search history has entered the equation creating more and more personalized search experiences, though still within the scope of the same overall system. Though fully personalized search is probably desirable, this individualistic perspective does not exploit the fact that a lot of a users behavior can be explained through their group membership. Children, despite individual differences, share many challenges and needs; as do men, Republicans, Chinese or any user group. This workshop takes a group-centric approach to IR and invites contributions that either (i) propose and evaluate IR systems for a particular user group or that (ii) describe how the search behavior of specific groups differ, potentially requiring a different way of addressing their needs.


information retrieval user groups user modeling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Maglaughlin, K., Sonnenwald, D.: User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(5), 327–342 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tombros, A., Ruthven, I., Jose, J.M.: How users assess web pages for information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56(4), 327–344 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barry, C.L.: User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 45(3), 149–159 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones, R., Kumar, R., Pang, B., Tomkins, A.: ”i know what you did last summer”: query logs and user privacy. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 909–914 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teevan, J., Morris, M.R., Bush, S.: Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 15–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weber, I., Castillo, C.: The demographics of web search. In: SIGIR, pp. 523–530 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weber, I., Jaimes, A.: Who uses web search for what: and how. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2011, pp. 15–24 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng, H., Cantú-Paz, E.: Personalized click prediction in sponsored search. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 351–360 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jansen, B.J., Moore, K., Carman, S.: Evaluating the performance of demographic targeting using gender in sponsored search. Inf. Process. Manage. 49(1), 286–302 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sharit, J., Hernández, M.A., Czaja, S.J., Pirolli, P.: Investigating the roles of knowledge and cognitive abilities in older adult information seeking on the web. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15(1), 3:1–3:25 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duarte Torres, S., Weber, I.: What and how children search on the web. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 393–402 (2011) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thatcher, A.: Web search strategies: The influence of web experience and task type. Inf. Process. Manage. 44(3), 1308–1329 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gossen, T., Low, T., Nürnberger, A.: What are the real differences of children’s and adults’ web search. In: SIGIR, pp. 1115–1116 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yue, Z., Harplale, A., He, D., Grady, J., Lin, Y., Walker, J., Gopal, S., Yang, Y.: Citeeval for evaluating personalized social web search. In: SIGIR Workshop on the Future of IR Evaluation, pp. 23–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matthijs, N., Radlinski, F.: Personalizing web search using long term browsing history. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 25–34 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chernov, S., Serdyukov, P., Chirita, P.-A., Demartini, G., Nejdl, W.: Building a Desktop Search Test-Bed. In: Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G. (eds.) ECIR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4425, pp. 686–690. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leporini, B., Andronico, P., Buzzi, M.: Designing search engine user interfaces for the visually impaired. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 57–66 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chevalier, A., Rozencwajg, P., Desjours, B.: Impact of Prior Knowledge and Computer Interface Organization in Information Searching Performances: A Study Comparing Younger and Older Web Users. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Posters, HCII 2011, Part I. CCIS, vol. 173, pp. 373–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Druin, A., Foss, E., Hatley, L., Golub, E., Guha, M.L., Fails, J., Hutchinson, H.: How children search the internet with keyword interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 89–96 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kerkmann, F., Lewandowski, D.: Accessibility of web search engines: Towards a deeper understanding of barriers for people with disabilities. Library Review 61, 608–621 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingmar Weber
    • 1
  • Djoerd Hiemstra
    • 2
  • Pavel Serdyukov
    • 3
  1. 1.Qatar Computing Research InstituteDohaQatar
  2. 2.University of TwenteTwenteThe Netherlands
  3. 3.YandexMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations