Understanding the ERP System Use in Budgeting

  • Wipawee Uppatumwichian
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 139)


This paper investigates the enterprise resource planning (ERP) system use in budgeting in order to explain how and why ERP systems are used or not used in budgeting practices. Budgeting is considered as a social phenomenon which requires flexibility for decision-making and integration for management controls. The analysis at the activity levels, guided by the concept of ‘conflict’ in structuration theory (ST), suggests that ERP systems impede flexibility in decision-making. However, the systems have the potential to facilitate integration in management controls. The analysis at the structural level, guided by the concept of ‘contradiction’ in ST, concludes that the ERP systems are not widely used in budgeting. This is because the systems support the integration function alone while budgeting assumes both roles. This paper offers the ERP system non-use explanation from an ulitarian perspective. Additionally, it calls for solutions to improve ERP use especially for the integration function.


structuration theory budgeting ERP system IS use 


  1. 1.
    Davenport, T.H.: Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76, 121–131 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shang, S., Seddon, P.B.: Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager’s perspective. Information Systems Journal 12, 271–299 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Granlund, M., Malmi, T.: Moderate impact of ERPS on management accounting: a lag or permanent outcome? Management Accounting Research 13, 299–321 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walsham, G.: Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis. MIS Quarterly 26, 359–380 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research 6, 144–176 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boudreau, M.-C., Robey, D.: Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science 16, 3–18 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pedersen, P.E., Ling, R.: Modifying adoption research for mobile interent service adoption: Cross-disciplinary interactions. In: Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (Year)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scapens, R.W., Jazayeri, M.: ERP systems and management accounting change: opportunities or impacts? A research note. European Accounting Review 12, 201–233 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granlund, M.: Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues: A research note. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 12, 3–19 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elbashir, M.Z., Collier, P.A., Sutton, S.G.: The role of organisational absorptive capacity in strategic use of business intelligence to support integrated management control systems. The Accounting Review 86, 155–184 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grabski, S.V., Leech, S.A., Schmidt, P.J.: A review of ERP research: A future agenda for accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems 25, 37–78 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dechow, N., Mouritsen, J.: Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integration. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 691–733 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quattrone, P., Hopper, T.: A ‘time–space odyssey’: management control systems in two multinational organisations. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 735–764 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jack, L., Kholeif, A.: Enterprise Resource Planning and a contest to limit the role of management accountants: A strong structuration perspective. Accounting Forum 32, 30–45 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Booth, P., Matolcsy, Z., Wieder, B.: The impacts of enterprise resource planning systems on accounting practice – The Australian experience. Australian Accounting Review 10, 4–18 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hyvönen, T.: Management accounting and information systems: ERP versus BoB. European Accounting Review 12, 155–173 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kallunki, J.P., Laitinen, E.K., Silvola, H.: Impact of enterprise resource planning systems on management control systems and firm performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 12, 20–39 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chapman, C.S., Kihn, L.A.: Information system integration, enabling control and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34, 151–169 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rom, A., Rohde, C.: Enterprise resource planning systems, strategic enterprise management systems and management accounting: A Danish study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 19, 50–66 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rom, A., Rohde, C.: Management accounting and integrated information systems: A literature review. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 8, 40–68 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davila, A., Foster, G.: Management control systems in early-stage startup companies. Accounting Review 82, 907–937 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Libby, T., Lindsay, R.M.: Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice. Management Accounting Research 21, 56–75 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abernethy, M.A., Brownell, P.: The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24, 189–204 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Covaleski, M.A., Evans, H., Luft, J., Shields, M.: Budgeting reserach: Three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration. In: Chapman, C., Hopwood, A., Shields, M. (eds.) Handbook of Management Accounting Reserach, vol. II, pp. 587–624. Elsevier, Oxford (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simons, R.: How New Top Managers Use Control Systems as Levers of Strategic Renewal. Strategic Management Journal 15, 169–189 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frow, N., Marginson, D., Ogden, S.: Continuous budgeting: Reconciling budget flexibility with budgetary control. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35, 444–461 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uppatumwichian, W.: Analysing Flexibility and Integration needs in budgeting IS technologies. In: The Twentith European Conference on Information Systems (Year)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kallinikos, J.: Deconstructing information packages: Organizational and behavioural implications of ERP systems. Information Technology and People 17, 8–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kumar, K., Van Hillegersberg, J.: ERP expiriences and evolution. Communications of the ACM 43, 22–26 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dechow, N., Granlund, M., Mouritsen, J.: Management Control of the Complex Organization: Relationships between Management Accounting and Information Technology. In: Chapman, C., Hopwood, A., Shields, M. (eds.) Handbook of Management Accounting Research, pp. 625–640. Elsevier, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Granlund, M., Mouritsen, J.: Introduction: problematizing the relationship between management control and information technology. European Accounting Review 12, 77–83 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Light, B., Holland, C.P., Wills, K.: ERP and best of breed: a comparative analysis. Business Process Management Journal 7, 216–224 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Soh, C., Kien, S.S., Tay-Yap, J.: Cultural fits and misfits: Is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM 43, 47–51 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Akkermans, H.A., Bogerd, P., Yücesan, E., van Wassenhove, L.N.: The impact of ERP on supply chain management: Exploratory findings from a European Delphi study. European Journal of Operational Research 146, 284–301 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Strong, D.M., Volkoff, O.: Understanding organization–Enterprise system fit: A path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Quarterly 34, 731–756 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brazel, J.F., Dang, L.: The Effect of ERP System Implementations on the Management of Earnings and Earnings Release Dates. Journal of Information Systems 22, 1–21 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spathis, C.: Enterprise systems implementation and accounting benefits. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 19, 67–82 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cadili, S., Whitley, E.A.: On the interpretative flexibility of hosted ERP systems. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14, 167–195 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Häkkinen, L., Hilmola, O.-P.: Life after ERP implementation: Long-term development of user perceptions of system success in an after-sales environment. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 21, 285–310 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Quattrone, P., Hopper, T.: What is IT?: SAP, accounting, and visibility in a multinational organisation. Information and Organization 16, 212–250 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science 32, 554–571 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Drazin, R., Van de Ven, A.H.: Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 30, 514–539 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Treviño, L.K., Webster, J., Stein, E.W.: Making Connections: Complementary Influences on Communication Media Choices, Attitudes, and Use. Organization Science 11, 163–182 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C.: Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications. Information System Research 10, 167–185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Giddens, A.: Central problems in social theory. University of California Press, Barkeley (1979)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Poole, M.S., DeSanctis, G.: Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. In: Whitman, M.E., Woszczynski, A.B. (eds.) The Handbook of Information Systems Research, pp. 206–249. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2004)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Walsham, G., Han, C.K.: Information systems strategy formation and implementation: The case of a central government agency. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 3, 191–209 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 3, 398–427 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Walsham, G.: Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method. European Journal of Information Systems 4, 74–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50, 25–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gerring, J.: What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review 98, 341–354 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nicolaou, A.I.: Firm Performance Effects in Relation to the Implementation and Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. Journal of Information Systems 18, 79–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A.: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Denzin, N.K.: The Reserach Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ahrens, T., Chapman, C.S.: Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research 21, 271–301 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chenhall, R.H.: Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, 127–168 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Goodhue, D.L., Wybo, M.D., Kirsch, L.J.: The impact of data Integration on the costs and benefits of information systems. MIS Quarterly 16, 293–311 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hyvönen, T., Järvinen, J., Pellinen, J.: A virtual integration—The management control system in a multinational enterprise. Management Accounting Research 19, 45–61 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wipawee Uppatumwichian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations