Looking for a Fit for Purpose: Business Process Maturity Models from a User’s Perspective

  • Amy Van Looy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 139)

Abstract

Many books and articles have been written about the importance of business process management. However, in practice, improving business processes remains challenging. Therefore, business process maturity models (BPMMs) have been developed to assist organizations in their search for business process excellence (e.g. CMMI or OMG-BPMM). However, given their importance, a BPMM proliferation exists and practitioners are left without overview. Moreover, BPMMs differ in approach. An organization wishing to start with a BPMM thus risks selecting a model that does not fully fits its needs. The BPMM literature and the general literature on maturity models are mainly restricted to the design perspective. To our knowledge, the user’s perspective is largely neglected. Based on an international Delphi study, this article introduces 14 criteria that (potential) BPMM users must consider to obtain a fit for purpose. The findings will be used to build a decision tool for BPMM selection.

Keywords

business process maturity maturity model selection decision criteria design research 

References

  1. 1.
    Houy, C., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Empirical Research in Business Process Management. Business Process Management Journal 16(4), 619–661 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuss, J.: Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(3), 213–222 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mettler, T., Rohner, P.: Situational Maturity Models as Instrumental Artifacts for Organizational Design. In: 4th DESRIST Conference, pp. 1–9. ACM, Malvern (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G.: Defining Business Process Maturity. A Journey towards Excellence. TQM & Business Excellence 22(11), 1119–1137 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas. In: 18th ACIS Conference, Toowoomba, pp. 642–653 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sheard, S.A.: Evolution of the Frameworks Quagmire. IEEE Computer 34(7), 96–98 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maier, A.M., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.J.: A Review of Maturity Grid based Approaches to Assessing Organizational Capabilities. In: Academy of Management Meeting (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mettler, T.: A Design Science Research Perspective on Maturity Models in Information Systems. Report BE IWI/HNE/03. Institute of Information Management, St. Gallen (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuss, J., Becker, J.: Maturity Models in Business Process Management. Business Process Management Journal 18(2), 7 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science 9(3), 458–467 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van De Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L.: The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes. The Academy of Management Journal 17(4), 605–621 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: an Example, Design Constructions and Applications. Information & Management 42, 15–29 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hasson, F., Keeney, S., McKenna, H.: Research Guidelines for the Delphi Survey Technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(4), 1008–1015 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Van Looy
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Business Administration & Public Administration, Department of Management & ICTUniversity College GhentGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics & Business Administration, Department of Management Information Science & Operations ManagementGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations