Skip to main content

Model for Managing Knowledge Workers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Knowledge Workers

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 1717 Accesses

Abstract

Assessing the status of knowledge in a company has to include methods of IC evaluation based on investment in the staff’s knowledge development. However, there are no methods for assessing the efficiency of decisions with respect to acquiring knowledge. The literature distinguishes qualitative measures (e.g., the Danish Project of IC measurement; the Scandia Navigator; IAM; the IC-Rating modelTM; VCSTM; the Balanced Scorecard; Saratoga Institute Report) and methods of valuating IC (e.g., MV/MB indicator, Q-Tobin indicator, CIV indicator, KCE indicator, VAICTM, Economic Added Value, IAV model, Strassmann’s method, IAMVTM, Broker’s Technology), as indicated in Chap. 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. (2001). Human resource management. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Dom Wydawniczy ABC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). The firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A 10-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27, 643–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., & Zając, E. J. (1994). Competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally-based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthelme, F., Ermine, J. L., & Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (1998). An architecture for knowledge evolution in organisations. European Journal of Operational Research, 109(2), 414–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. (1998). Perspectives on operations research in data and knowledge management. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. R. (2004). Ressourcen-Fit bei M&A-Transaktionen: Konzeptionalisierung, Operationlisiernung und Erfolgswirkung auf Basis des Resource-based View. Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berio, G., & Harzallah, M. (2005). Knowledge management for competence management. Journal of Universal Knowledge Management, 0(1), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boos, F., & Jarmai, H. (1994). Kernkompetenzen—gesucht und gefunden. Harvard Business Manager, 16, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2000). Strategic human resource management: Where have we come from and where should we be going? International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G. (1998). The strategic management of technological learning in project/program management: The role of extranets, intranets and intelligent agents in knowledge generation, diffusion, and leveraging. Technovation, 18(11), 697–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Zahra, S. A. (2003). Creating wealth in family firms through managing resources: Comments and extensions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 359–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implication for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29, 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosal, C. (2002). Time and psychological types—An attempt to reconstruct. In K. Maurin & A. Motycka (Eds.), About thinking Junga. Warszawa: Eneteia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draganidis, F., & Mentzas, G. (2006). Competency based management: A review of systems and approaches. Information Management and Computer Security, 14(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, S. (1999). Building knowledge management into strategy. Making sense of a new perspective. Long Range Plan, 32, 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B., & Mikkelsen, J. (1996). Competitive advantage and the concept of core competence. In N. J. Foss & C. Knudsen (Eds.), Towards a competence theory of the firm (pp. 54–74). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farlow, S. J. (1984). Self-organizing methods in modeling-GMDH type algorithms. New York: Mersel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiling, J. (2001). Resource-based view und ökonomische theorie: grundlagen und positionierung des ressourcenansatzes. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Führing, M. (2006). Risikomanagement und Personal: Management des Fluktuationsrisiko von Schlüsselpersonen aus ressourcenorientierter Perspektive. Wiesbaden: Springer 11775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gajek, L., & Kałuszka, M. (2000). Methods of statistical inference. Warszawa: WNT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. E. (1989). The genetic algorithms approach (pp. 247–253). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1997). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. W., & Kearney, R. C. (2001). Anticipated changes in human resources management: Views from the field. Public Administration Review, 61, 309–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firms performance. Academy of Management journal, 40(1), 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwachnienko, A. G. (1982). Induktiwnyj metod samoorganizacji modelej sloznych system po eksperymentalnym danym. Kijów: Naukowa Dumka.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. (2007). Developing evaluation capacity through process use. In J. B. Cousins (Ed.), Process use in theory, research, and practice: New directions for evaluation (p. 116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. (1984). Self-organization and associative memory. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosieradzka, A., Lis, S. (2000). Produktywność (Productivity). Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostera, M. (2000). Zarządzanie personelem (Personnel management). Warszawa: PWE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, C., Ringling, S., & Yang, S. (2005). Mastering HR management with SAP. The complete guide to SAP HR. Bonn: Galileo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Król, H., & Ludwiczyński, A. (2007). Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi (Human resources management). Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource system and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtarski, J. (2000). Personnel function and personnel management. In T. Listwan (Ed.), Personnel management. Wrocław: Economical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, R. (2002). Knowledge management systems: Information and communication technologies for knowledge management. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability view of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R., & MacMillan, I. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, E., & Beech, N. (1997). Human resource management. Warszawa: Gebethner&S-ka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, H., Bergmann, R. (1998). Ein Grundmodell des ressourcenorientierten Ansatzes der Unternehmens-führung. In H. Nolte (Hrsg.): Aspekte ressourcenorientierter Unternehmensführung (S. 1–27). Hampp: Mün-chen – Mering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaug, O. (1993). Human capital in organizations. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patalas, J., & Krupa, T. (2007). The prediction value of criteria of ERP system efficiency in small and medium size enterprises (SMES). In J. Jakubowski & B. Franczyk (Eds.), Production engineering: Computer science driven production engineering. University of Zielona Góra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patalas-Maliszewska, J. (2009). The concept of system supporting decision making enabling to asses and forecast of knowledge in SMEs—Research results. Applied Computer Science, 5(2), 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patalas-Maliszewska, J. (2011). The personnel usefulness function—the method for planning and selection of personnel in SME. Management, 15(2), 132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patalas-Maliszewska, J., & Hochmeister, M. (2011). Modeling strategic-knowledge-resource management based on individual competencies in SMEs. Contemporary Economics, 5, 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patalas-Maliszewska, J., & Werthner, H. (2010). Methodology of knowledge value assessment in an enterprise of SME sector. Management and Production Engineering Review, 1(1), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (2003). Personnel business function—Processes and procedures for staff. Warszawa: Poltext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner-Hahn, J., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Bourhis, A. C. (1996). Moderating effects of personal and contextual factors in age discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 628–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper-Rowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prezewowsky, M. (2007). Demografischer Wandel und Personalmanagement: Herausforderungen und Handlungsalternativen vor dem Hintergrund der Bevölkerungsentwicklung. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R. E., & Pasmore, W. A. (1992). Organizing for learning. Research in organization or change and development (pp. 37–114). London: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodriguez, A. R., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekuła, Z. (2001). Planowanie personelu (Personnel planning). Kraków: Economical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, D. L., & Wolfe, R. A. (2000). Examining sustainable competitive advantage in intercollegiate athletics: A resource-based view. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studer, R., Benjamins, V. R., & Fensel, D. (1998). Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data Knowledge Engineering, 25(1–2), 161–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szałkowski, A. (Ed.). (2002). Personel development. Kraków: Economical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 18, 207–229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justyna Patalas-Maliszewska .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patalas-Maliszewska, J. (2013). Model for Managing Knowledge Workers. In: Managing Knowledge Workers. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36600-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics