Efficient IP-Level Network Topology Capture

  • Thomas Bourgeau
  • Timur Friedman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7799)

Abstract

Large-scale distributed network route tracing systems obtain the IP-level internet topology and can be used to monitor and understand network behavior. However, existing approaches require one or more days to obtain a full graph of the public IPv4 internet, which is too slow to capture important network dynamics. This paper presents a new approach to topology capture that aims at obtaining the graph rather than full routes, and that employs partial rather than full route tracing to achieve this aim. Our NTC (Network Topology Capture) heuristics use information from previous tracing rounds to guide probing in future rounds. Through simulations based upon two months of traces that we obtained, we find that the heuristics improve significantly on the state of the art for reducing probing overhead while maintaining good graph coverage. We also conduct the first study of how such a distributed tracing system performs in its ability to capture network dynamics.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Claffy, K., Hyun, Y., Keys, K., Fomenkov, M., Krioukov, D.: Internet mapping: from art to science. In: Proc. CATCH (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shavitt, Y., Shir, E.: DIMES: Let the internet measure itself. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 35(5), 71–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madhyastha, H.V., Isdal, T., Piatek, M., Dixon, C., Anderson, T., Krishnamurthy, A., Venkataramani, A.: iPlane: An Information Plane for Distributed Services. In: Proc. Usenix OSDI (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourgeau, T.: Monitoring network topology dynamism of large-scale traceroute-based measurements. In: Proc. CNSM (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alves, M., Corsello, L., Karrenberg, D., Ogut, C., Santcroos, M., Sojka, R., Uijterwaal, H., Wilhelm, R.: Providing active measurement as a regular service for ISP’s. In: Proc. PAM (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourgeau, T., Augé, J., Friedman, T.: TopHat: Supporting Experiments through Measurement Infrastructure Federation. In: Magedanz, T., Gavras, A., Thanh, N.H., Chase, J.S. (eds.) TridentCom 2010. LNICST, vol. 46, pp. 542–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Latapy, M., Magnien, C., Ouédraogo, F.: A radar for the internet. Complex Systems 20, 23–30 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lakhina, A., Byers, J.W., Crovella, M., Xie, P.: Sampling biases in IP topology measurements. In: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shavitt, Y., Weinsberg, U.: Quantifying the importance of vantage points distribution in internet topology measurements. In: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donnet, B., Raoult, P., Friedman, T., Crovella, M.: Deployment of an algorithm for large-scale topology discovery. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC) 24, 2210–2220 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gonen, M., Shavitt, Y.: A Θ(logn)-approximation for the set cover problem with set ownership. Information Processing Letters 109(3), 183–186 (2009)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chun, B., Culler, D., Roscoe, T., Bavier, A., Peterson, L., Wawrzoniak, M., Bowman, M.: PlanetLab: an overlay testbed for broad-coverage services. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 33(3), 3–12 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz-Bassett, E., Scott, C., Choffnes, D.R., Cunha, I., Valancius, V., Feamster, N., Madhyastha, H.V., Anderson, T., Krishnamurthy, A.: LIFEGUARD: practical repair of persistent route failures. In: Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quoitin, B., Van den Schrieck, V., Francois, P., Bonaventure, O.: IGen: Generation of router-level internet topologies through network design heuristics. In: Proc. ITC (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Augustin, B., Friedman, T., Teixeira, R.: Measuring multipath routing in the internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) 19(3), 830–840 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gunes, M.H., Sarac, K.: Analyzing Router Responsiveness to Active Measurement Probes. In: Moon, S.B., Teixeira, R., Uhlig, S. (eds.) PAM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5448, pp. 23–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Bourgeau
    • 1
  • Timur Friedman
    • 1
  1. 1.LIP6-CNRS and LINCS LaboratoriesUPMC Sorbonne UniversitésFrance

Personalised recommendations