Measuring Query Latency of Top Level DNS Servers

  • Jinjin Liang
  • Jian Jiang
  • Haixin Duan
  • Kang Li
  • Jianping Wu
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36516-4_15

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7799)
Cite this paper as:
Liang J., Jiang J., Duan H., Li K., Wu J. (2013) Measuring Query Latency of Top Level DNS Servers. In: Roughan M., Chang R. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7799. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Abstract

We surveyed the latency of upper DNS hierarchy from 19593 vantage points around the world to investigate the impact of uneven distribution of top level DNS servers on end-user latency. Our findings included: 1) generally top level DNS servers served Internet users efficiently, with median latency 20.26ms for root, 42.64ms for .com/.net, 39.07ms for .org; 2) quality of service was uneven, Europe and North America were the best while Africa and South America were 3 to 6 times worse; 3) most of the root servers performed well in Europe and North America, but only F, J, L roots showed low query latency in other continents; 4) query latency of F and L roots showed that only about 60 resolvers were routed to the nearest anycast instances. We also revealed two problems that lead to constantly large query latency (6s~18s) for resolvers. One was buggy implementation of some resolvers on IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack hosts, the other was misconfigured middle-boxes that filtered large or fragmented DNSSEC packets.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinjin Liang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jian Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Haixin Duan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kang Li
    • 3
  • Jianping Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Network Science and CyberspaceTsinghua UniversityChina
  2. 2.Tsinghua National Laboratory on Information Science and TechnologyChina
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of GeorgiaUSA

Personalised recommendations