Abstract
As mentioned in the introduction, we selected three cases in southwest and north China to represent the three types of contentions. This chapter will provide an overview of the development of the three cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“Fake migration” refers to those farmers whose lands and houses were not submerged by reservoir but tried to bribe the local officials in order to be included on the migrant list and receive resettlement compensation.
- 2.
Three Gorges Construction Project Resettlement Ordinance http://www.chinaresettlement.com/regu/c-law01.htm (17 August 2007).
References
F. Deng, The return of Three Gorges migrants. Phoenix Wkly. 16 (2005)
J. He, J. Jin, Subaltern expression in fragmentation – civil environmental protection organization in the debate of Yunnan hydropower development. Sea Knowl. 4 (2008)
X. Ying, Stories of the Dahe Migrants’ Petition (SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ying, X. (2013). A Narration of the Legal Contention Process. In: A Study of the Stability of Contemporary Rural Chinese Society. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36400-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36400-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36399-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36400-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)