Skip to main content

Credibilistic Programming

  • Chapter
Credibilistic Programming

Part of the book series: Uncertainty and Operations Research ((UOR))

Abstract

The decision analysis with fuzzy objective or fuzzy constraints is natural in some real-world applications, and sometimes such analysis seems to be inevitable. Credibilistic programming is a type of mathematical programming for handling the fuzzy decision problems. In the past years, researchers have proposed various efficient modeling approaches including expected value model, chance-constrained programming model, entropy optimization model, cross-entropy minimization model, and regret minimization model. This chapter provides a general description on credibilistic programming. In addition, a brief introduction on genetic algorithm will also be given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chou TY, Liu TK, Lee CN, Jeng CR (2008) Method of inequality-based multiobjective genetic algorithm for domestic daily aircraft routing. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A 38(2):299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Cuellar MP, Pegalajar MC (2008) Multiobjective hybrid optimization and training of recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B 38(2):381–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M (2000) Multicriteria optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald G, Kurek W, Brdys MA (2008) Grid implementation of a parallel multiobjective genetic algorithm for optimized allocation of chlorination stations in drinking water distribution systems: Chojnice case study. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part C 38(4):497–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina M, Amato P (2004) A fuzzy definition of “optimality” for many-criteria optimization problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A 34(2):315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms & engineering optimization. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung MH, Shu LS, Ho SJ, Hwang SF, Ho SY (2008) A novel intelligent multiobjective simulated annealing algorithm for designing robust PID controllers. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A 38(2):319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza JR (1994) Genetic programming, II. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ralescu D, Tang T (2011) Fuzzy train energy consumption minimization model and algorithm. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 8(4):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Shou BY, Qin ZF (2012) An expected regret minimization portfolio selection model. Eur J Oper Res 218:484–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wong HS (2009) Logic optimality for multi-objective optimization. Appl Math Comput 215:3045–3056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (1998) Minimax chance constrained programming models for fuzzy decision systems. Inf Sci 112(1–4):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Iwamura K (1998a) Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94(2):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Iwamura K (1998b) A note on chance constrained programming with fuzzy coefficients. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100(1–3):229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Liu YK (2002) Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(4):445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z (1996) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierro F, Khu ST, Savic DA (2007) An investigation on preference order ranking scheme for multiobjective evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(1):17–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin ZF, Li X, Ji XY (2009) Portfolio selection based on fuzzy cross-entropy. J Comput Appl Math 228:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan KC, Khor EF, Lee TH (2005) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and applications. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou XF, Chen Y, Liu MZ, Kang JS (2008) A new evolutionary algorithm for solving many-objective optimization problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B 38(5):1402–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, X. (2013). Credibilistic Programming. In: Credibilistic Programming. Uncertainty and Operations Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36376-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics