Advertisement

Fringe 2013 pp 87-95 | Cite as

Measurement of Aspheres and Free-Form Surfaces with the Tilted-Wave-Interferometer

  • Goran Bastian Baer
  • Johannes Schindler
  • Christof Pruss
  • Wolfgang Osten

Abstract

In the area of high performance optics aspherical surfaces have become the solution of choice over the past years [1] [2]. The advantage of aspherical, compared to spherical elements, is the highly increased degree of freedom for the optics design. This allows better correction of aberrations, by simultaneously reducing the number of elements needed to fulfill a given design target, enabling the construction of more compact optical systems, with higher optical performance at the same time. As a result of these convincing advantages aspherical optics are widely used in state of the art optical systems, starting from mass products like imaging systems for micro cameras in smartphones, reaching to high end optical systems used in lithography or space applications. Even more degrees of freedom in the design can be reached, if the rotational symmetry of the aspheric surface is broken. Such free-form surfaces that do not have to show any symmetry at all can be used to further improve the performance of an optical system. One possibility is the construction of systems where the elements are no longer arranged along a straight line, but where the optical axis is folded. By taking advantage of this design option it is possible to develop very compact systems, which also are less sensitive to mechanical and thermal influences. Another advantage of off-axis systems that can be realized with free-form elements is the avoidance of reflexes that often occur at the center of the lens in a classical system. This is especially important for applications with coherent sources. Further, certain wavelengths demand the usage of mirror optics instead of lenses, if there aren’t any optical refractive materials with tolerable absorption available. To avoid central obscurations, here again the easiest way is to use free-from mirrors. One example for this kind of optical systems is the EUV lithography that will be used in the next generation of semiconductor fabrication.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Braunecker, B., Hentschel, R., Tiziani, H.J.: Advanced Optics Using Aspherical Elements. In: SPIE Press Monograph, vol. PM173 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schulz, G.: Aspheric Surfaces. In: Wolf, E. (ed.) Progress in Optics, vol. XXV. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Evans, C.J., Bryan, J.B.: Compensation for errors introduced by nonzero fringe sensities in phase-measuring interferometers. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 42(1), 577–580 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lowman, A.E., Greivenkamp, J.E.: Interferometer errors due to the presence of fringes. Appl. Opt. 35, 6826–6828 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuechel, M.F.: Interferometric measurement of rotationally symmetric aspheric surfaces. Optatec TDO4-25 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murphy, et al.: Stitching interferometry: a flexible solution for surface metrology. Optics and Photonics News 14, 38–43 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tricard, M.: Subapertur-Stitching-Interferometrie: Messtechnik für die Asphären-Präzisionsfertigung. Photonik 6, 38-41 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garbusi, E., Pruss, C., Osten, W.: Interferometer for precise and flexible asphere testing. Opt. Lett. 33, 2973–2975 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liesener, J., Garbusi, E., Pruss, C., Osten, W.: Verfahren und Messvorrichtung zur Vermessung einer optisch glatten Oberfläche. Deutsches Patent und Markenamt: 10, 057 606.3 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liesener, J.: Zum Einsatz räumlicher Lichtmodulatoren in der interferometrischen Wellenfrontmesstechnik. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garbusi, E., Osten, W.: Perturbation methods in optics: application to the interferometric measurement of surfaces. Optical Society of America, Bd. 12 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baer, G., Garbusi, E., Lyda, W., Osten, W.: Automated surface positioning for a non-null test interferometer. Opt. Eng. 49(9), 095602Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baer, G., Osten, W.: Justage einer zu prüfenden optischen Fläche in einer Prüfvorrichtung. Deutsches Patent und Markenamt: DE102011102196B3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Goran Bastian Baer
    • 1
  • Johannes Schindler
    • 1
  • Christof Pruss
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Osten
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Technische Optik and Stuttgart Research Center of Photonic Engineering (SCoPE)University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations