Evaluating the IT Strategic Plan for the Public Administration in Portugal

  • Diogo Nunes
  • Isabel Rosa
  • Miguel Mira da Silva
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 143)

Abstract

Over the years ICT kept evolving and spreading. This vulgarization sparked numerous ad hoc technological projects inside ministries and public institutes which led to the creation of small scattered technological infrastructures and solutions. The Portuguese Government started taking action with the writing of a strategic plan (PGETIC) with two major goals: increase the quality and usefulness of IT services and reduce the IT spending. However the plan isn’t really strategic. Hence we propose the comparison of PGETIC with recognized IT Governance frameworks to find out where it excels and fails. Our evaluation indicates that PGETIC as a strategic plan is incomplete, redundant, excessive and overly low-level.

Keywords

IS/IT governance Strategic plan assessment Value oriented organizations Public administration’s ICT 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Diário da República. Resolução do Conselho de Ministros n.º 12/2012: Diário da República, 1.a série - N.º 27 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    IVI. Research and Development. Innovation Value Institute (June 15, 2012), http://ivi.nuim.ie/research-development.shtml
  3. 3.
    Hevner, A., et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, Society for Information Management and the Management Information Systems Research Center 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peffers, K., et al.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems/Winter 24(3), 45–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pereira, R., Mira da Silva, M.: A Literature Review: Guidelines and Contingency Factors for it Governance. In: 16th IEEE International EDOC, Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pereira, R., Mira da Silva, M.: Designing a new Integrated IT Governance and IT Management Framework Based on Both Scientific and Practitioner Viewpoint. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 8 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Webb, P., Pollard, C., Ridley, G.: Attempting to Define IT Governance Wisdom or Folly. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costello, T.: A New Management Framework for IT. IEEE Computer Society, IT Professional (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curley, M., Kenneally, J.: Using the IT Capability Maturity Framework to improve IT Capability and Value Creation: An Intel IT Case Study. In: 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cabinet Office. ICT Strategy Strategic Implementation Plan to deliver savings of over a billion pounds. Cabinet Office, http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/ict-strategy-strategic-implementation-plan-deliver-savings-over-billion-pounds (cited: September 14, 2012)
  11. 11.
    Cabinet Office. Government ICT Strategy. Cabinet Office, London (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cabinet Office. One Year On: Implementing the Government ICT Strategy (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Issa-Salwe, A., et al.: Strategic Information Systems Alignment: Alignment of IS/IT with Business Strategy. Journal of Information Processing Systems 6(1) (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, D., et al.: Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications. MIS Quarterly 34(2), 233–259 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coelho, J.D.: Considerações sobre a oportunidade e o impacto do PGETIC na AP: itSMF (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meertens, L.O., et al.: Mapping the Business Model Canvas to ArchiMate. In: SAC 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Ontological Evaluation of Reference Models Using The Bunge-Wand-Weber Model. In: Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Österle, H., et al.: Memorandum on Design-Oriented Information Systems Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 7–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation. In: 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 255–266 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diogo Nunes
    • 1
  • Isabel Rosa
    • 1
  • Miguel Mira da Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Superior TecnicoLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations