Do Workflow-Based Systems Satisfy the Demands of the Agile Enterprise of the Future?

  • Ilia Bider
  • Paul Johannesson
  • Erik Perjons
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 132)

Abstract

Workflow-based systems dominate the theory and practice of Business Process Management (BPM) leaving little space to other directions, including Adaptive Case Management. While there are reasons for such dominance in today’s enterprise environment, it is time the BPM community studied this dominance in the light of the requirements of the enterprises of the future. This paper analyzes whether workflow-based systems will be able to satisfy business needs in the future based on the assumption that the essential property of the enterprise of the future is agility. The paper identifies properties that a business process should possess in order to be suitable for employing a workflow-based system to support it. Then, it analyzes whether these properties are compatible with the needs of the enterprise of the future and shows why workflow-based systems may become obsolete in the future.

Keywords

Workflow Enterprise agility BPM non-workflow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kleiner, N.: The Focus of Requirements Engineering in Workflow Application Development. CEUR workshops proceedings, vol. 75, pp. 372–377 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., Layer, J.K.: A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37, 445–460 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Baresi, L., et al.: Workflow design methodology. In: Grefen, Pernici, Sanchez (eds.) Database Support for Workflow Management: The WIDE Project, pp. 47–94. Kluwer (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Preparing for the Era of Cloud Computing: Towards a Framework for Selecting Business Process Support Services. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) EMMSAD 2012 and BPMDS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bider, I., Bellinger, G., Perjons, E.: Modeling an Agile Enterprise: Reconciling Systems and Process Thinking. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 238–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bider, I., Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: A Strategy for Merging Social Software with Business Process Support. In: zur Muehlen, M., Su, J. (eds.) BPM 2010 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 66, pp. 372–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilia Bider
    • 1
  • Paul Johannesson
    • 1
  • Erik Perjons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems ScienceStockholm UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations