Data Centric BPM and the Emerging Case Management Standard: A Short Survey

  • Mike Marin
  • Richard Hull
  • Roman Vaculín
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 132)

Abstract

Case Management, with its emphasis on the case folder as the anchor for managing business processes, is emerging as a way to provide rich flexibility for knowledge workers while retaining key advantages of BPM systems. This has introduced new challenges in connection with modeling case processes. This short survey traces the history of key modeling ideas and constructs that are being incorporated into the emerging “Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN)” response to the Object Management Group (OMG) request for proposals for a Case Management Process Modeling standard.

Keywords

Case handling systems Case Management Case Folder Business Artifact Guard-Stage-Milestone CMMN Modeling notation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Swenson, K.D. (ed.): Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management will Revolutionize the Way that Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Object Management Group. Case Management Process Modeling (CMPM) Request for Proposal. Document bmi/2009-09-23 (October 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    BizAgi, Cordys, IBM, Oracle, SAP AG, Singularity (OMG Submitters), Agile Enterprise Design, Stiftelsen SINTEF, TIBCO, Trisotech (Co-Authors). Proposal for: Case Management Modeling and Notation (CMMN) Specification 1.0. (OMG Document bmi/2012-07-10). In response to: Case Management Process Modeling (CMPM) RFP (OMG Document bmi/2009-09-04). Object Management Group (July 2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business artifacts: An approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal 42(3), 428–445 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumaran, S., Nandi, P., Heath, T., Bhaskaran, K., Das, R.: ADoc-oriented programming. In: Symp. on Applications and the Internet, SAINT, pp. 334–343 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Redding, G., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Iordachescu, A.: Modelling flexible processes with business objects. In: Proc. 11th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, pp. 41–48 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: Towards a framework for object-aware process management. Journal of Software Maintenance 23(4), 205–244 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hull, R., Llirbat, F., Siman, E., Su, J., Dong, G., Kumar, B., Zhou, G.: Declarative workflows that support easy modification and dynamic browsing. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, WACC, pp. 69–78 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M.: Case Handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hull, R., Damaggio, E., Fournier, F., Gupta, M., Heath III, F(T.), Hobson, S., Linehan, M., Maradugu, S., Nigam, A., Sukaviriya, P., Vaculin, R.: Introducing the Guard-Stage-Milestone Approach for Specifying Business Entity Lifecycles. In: Bravetti, M. (ed.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hull, R., Damaggio, E., De Masellis, R., Fournier, F., Gupta, M., Heath, T., Hobson, S., Linehan, M., Maradugu, S., Nigam, A., Sukaviriya, P., Vaculín, R.: Business Artifacts with Guard-Stage-Milestone Lifecycles: Managing Artifact Interactions with Conditions and Events. In: Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. Distributed Event-Based Systems, DEBS (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Damaggio, E., Hull, R., Vaculín, R.: On the Equivalence of Incremental and Fixpoint Semantics for Business Artifacts with Guard-Stage-Milestone Lifecycles. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 396–412. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu, W., Becker, B., Boudreaux, J., Braman, S., Do, T., Gomez, D., Marin, M., Vaughan, A.: Advanced Case Management with IBM Case Manager. IBM Redbooks, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore, C., Le Clair, C., Vitti, R.: Dynamic Case Management - An Old Idea Catches New Fire. Forrester (December 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Man, H.: Case Management: A Review of Modeling Approaches. BPTrends (January 2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glushko, R.J., McGrath, T.: Document Engineering: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, J., Kumar, A.: A Framework for Document-Driven Workflow Systems. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 285–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumaran, S., Liu, R., Wu, F.Y.: On the Duality of Information-Centric and Activity-Centric Models of Business Processes. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 32–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strosnider, J.K., Nandi, P., Kumaran, S., Ghosh, S., Arsanjani, A.: Model-driven synthesis of SOA solutions. IBM Systems Journal 47(3), 415–432 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rooze, E.J., Paapst, M., Sombekke, J.: eCase Management: An international study in judicial organization. Report sponsored by the Netherlands Council for the Judiciary (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Man, H.: Case Management: Cordys Approach. BPTrends (February 2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Marin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Hull
    • 3
  • Roman Vaculín
    • 3
  1. 1.IBM Software GroupCosta MesaUSA
  2. 2.University of South AfricaPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterHawthorneUSA

Personalised recommendations