A Qualitative Research Perspective on BPM Adoption and the Pitfalls of Business Process Modeling

  • Monika Malinova
  • Jan Mendling
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 132)

Abstract

Business Process Management (BPM) is used by organizations as a method to increase awareness and knowledge of business processes. Although many companies adopt BPM, there is still a notable insecurity of how to set it up in the most effective way. A considerate amount of research concerning partial aspects of BPM adoption has been done, such as the pitfalls of business process modeling. However, up until now hardly any empirical research has been conducted that aims at validating them. In this paper we address this research gap by conducting eleven in-depth interviews with BPM experts from various companies. We use the Grounded Theory approach to qualitatively analyze the data. Our contribution is twofold. First, we derive a conceptual framework showing the insights of BPM adoption by organizations. Second, we use the evidence from the interviews to discuss the pitfalls of business process modeling and show the countermeasures that are taken by companies.

Keywords

BPM Adoption Business Process Modeling Pitfalls 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kettinger, W., Teng, J., Guha, S.: Business process change: A Study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly 1(21), 55–80 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reijers, H.A., Liman Mansar, S.: Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitaive evaluation of successful redesign heuristics, pp. 283–306 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandara, W., Gable, G., Rosemann, M.: Factors and measures of business process modeling: model building through a multiple case study. European Journal of Information Systems, 347–360 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.: The Past, Present, and Future of “IS Success”. Journal of the AIS, 341–362 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Mudimigh, A.: The role and impact of business process management in enterprise systems implementation. Business Process Management Journal 13, 866–874 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reijers, H.A., van Wijk, S., Mutschler, B., Leurs, M.: BPM in Practice: Who Is Doing What? In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 45–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bandara, W., Guy, G., Rosemann, M.: Business Process Modeling Success: An Empirically Tested Measurement Model. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Information Systems, pp.1–20 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trkman, P.: The Critical Success Factors of Business Process Management. International Journal of Information Management, 125–134 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandara, W., Alibabaei, A., Aghdasi, M.: Means of achieving Business Process Manage-ment success factors. In: Proc. Mediterranean Conf. on Information Systems (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosemann, M.: Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part A. Business Process Management Journal, 249–254 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosemann, M.: Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part B. Business Process Management Journal 12(3), 377–384 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, A.: A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32–50 (1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan, R.: Case study research methods, California (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams, C.: Research Methods. J. of Business & Economic Research 5(3), 65–72 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Creswell, J.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., Mead, M.: The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 11(3), 369–385 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. SAGE Publications (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spanyi, A.: More for less: the power of process management. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Bruin, T., Doebeli, G.: Progressing an Organizational Approach to BPM: Integrating Experience from Industry and Research. In: Proper, E., Harmsen, F., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) PRET 2009. LNBIP, vol. 28, pp. 34–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richardson, C.: Process Governance Best Practices: Building a BPM Center of Excellence. BPTrends (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Malinova
    • 1
  • Jan Mendling
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Information BusinessWirtschaftsuniversität WienAustria

Personalised recommendations