Skip to main content
Book cover

Astrobiology, History, and Society pp 73–83Cite as

Extraterrestrial Life as the Great Analogy, Two Centuries Ago and in Modern Astrobiology

Part of the Advances in Astrobiology and Biogeophysics book series (ASTROBIO)

Abstract

Mainstream ideas on the existence of extraterrestrial life in the late 18th and early 19th centuries are examined, with a focus on William Herschel, one of the greatest astronomers of all time. Herschel viewed all of the planets and moons of our solar system as inhabited, and gave logical arguments that even the Sun, and by extension all of the stars, was a giant planet fit for habitation by intelligent beings. The importance for astrobiology both two centuries ago and now of the type of inductive reasoning called “analogy” is emphasized. Analogy is an imperfect tool, but given that we have only one known case of life and of a life-bearing planet, it is very difficult to make progress in astrobiology without resorting to analogy, in particular between known life and possible other life. We cannot overcome the “N = 1 Problem” without resorting to this “Great Analogy” to guide our research.

Keywords

  • Solar System
  • Analogical Reasoning
  • Giant Planet
  • Natural Theology
  • Saturnian Ring

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35983-5_3
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-35983-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Until the 20th century, discussions of extraterrestrial life always centered on intelligent beings, with very limited interest in the possible existence of simple organisms.

  2. 2.

    The N = 1 Problem leads to heroic mathematical and logical efforts to overcome it. For example, see the recent insightful Bayesian analysis by Spiegel and Turner (2012), who try to reach conclusions about planets in general based on the fact that life emerged relatively quickly for the one known case of early Earth.

  3. 3.

    A modern English translation with excellent commentary was published in 1990 by the University of California Press.

  4. 4.

    Even today, there are those who very much work in this tradition by promoting the necessity, based on scientific findings, for so-called Intelligent Design. For a remarkable astrobiological example, see The Privileged Planet by Gonzalez and Richards (2004).

  5. 5.

    The usefulness of the Cassini Division to the Saturnians was a point that Herschel undoubtedly took from Ferguson's book, although he does not acknowledge this.

  6. 6.

    See Crowe (2011) for a full historical account of the notion of an inhabited Sun, an idea that started long before Herschel and, abetted by his authority and arguments, lasted well past his time.

  7. 7.

    Herschel (1795, 66) also lists the properties of the Moon that greatly differ from those of Earth: no seas, no atmosphere, no dense clouds and thus no rain, very different types of seasons, days, and climates. He then argues, however, that this diversity is no problem and only means that the lunarians will have adapted to these conditions and thus be notably different from us.

References

  • Crowe, Michael J. 1986. The Extraterrestrial Life Debate, 1750–1900: The Idea of a Plurality of Worlds from Kant to Lowell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, Michael J. 2011. “The Surprising History of Claims for Life on the Sun.” Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 14: 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, Michael J., and Matthew F. Dowd. 2013. “The Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Antiquity to 1900.” In Astrobiology, History, and Society: Life Beyond Earth and the Impact of Discovery, ed. Douglas A. Vakoch. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. 1982. Plurality of Worlds: The Origins of the Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, Guillermo, and Jay Richards. 2004. The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 1780. “Astronomical Observations Relating to the Mountains of the Moon.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 70: 507–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 1784. “On the Remarkable Appearances at the Polar Regions of the Planet Mars, the Inclination of Its Axis, the Position of Its Poles, and Its Spheroidical Figure; with a Few Hints Relating to Its Real Diameter and Atmosphere.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 74: 233–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 1785. “On the Construction of the Heavens.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 75: 213–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 1792. “On the Ring of Saturn, and the Rotation of the Fifth Satellite Upon Its Axis.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 82: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 1795. “On the Nature and Construction of the Sun and Fixed Stars.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 85: 46–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 1805. “Observations on the Singular Figure of the Planet Saturn.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 95: 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, William. 1814. “Astronomical Observations Relating to the Sidereal Part of the Heavens, and Its Connection with the Nebulous Part; Arranged for the Purpose of a Critical Examination.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 104: 248–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Mary. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, Michael. 2011. Discoverers of the Universe: William and Caroline Herschel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, Simon. 1980. “‘The Great Laboratories of the Universe’: William Herschel on Matter Theory and Planetary Life.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 11: 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, David S., and Edwin L. Turner. 2012. “Bayesian Analysis of the Astrobiological Implications of Life’s Early Emergence on Earth.” Proceedings of the National Academies of Science. 109: 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Woodruff T., III, and John A. Baross. 2007. Planets and Life: The Emerging Science of Astrobiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Woodruff T. Sullivan III

Authors
  1. Woodruff T. Sullivan III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woodruff T. Sullivan III .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Director of Interstellar Message Composi, Bernardo Avenue 189, Mountain View, 94043, USA

    Douglas A. Vakoch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sullivan, W.T. (2013). Extraterrestrial Life as the Great Analogy, Two Centuries Ago and in Modern Astrobiology. In: Vakoch, D. (eds) Astrobiology, History, and Society. Advances in Astrobiology and Biogeophysics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35983-5_3

Download citation