Skip to main content

Team Development and Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3233 Accesses

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

Executing the activities resulting from an enterprise business alignment requires a diverse mix of individuals who must be integrated into effective sets: groups and teams (for example: project teams, workgroups). These sets are formed to ease the work pressure on the individual and achieve the alignment activities within the desired time frame. An effective set often outperforms individuals within in an enterprise, because high performance within an enterprise business requires multiple skills, judgments, and experiences. Of course, there are certain tasks at which individuals will always outperform a group or a team; for instance, where talent or experience is the critical performance factor required to achieve an activity. Our purpose in this chapter is to provide guidelines for building a cohesive team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cognitive conflict here refers to conflict regarding the way a group approaches and attempts to solve problems encountered in the course of its development. Viewed most broadly, cognitive conflict is a conflict in way of seeing and thinking a perspective.

References

  • Adair, J. (1997). Decision making and problem solving. London: CIPD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair, J. E. (2009). Effective decision making (Rev. Ed.): The essential guide to thinking for management success. London: Pan Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (1988). Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergiel, E. B. (2006). Shared mental models and team performance: Clarifying the group process mediator of cohesion. Ph.D. thesis, Mississippi State University. Department of Management and Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. W. (1997). Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brest, P., & Krieger, L. H. (2010). Problem solving, decision making, and professional judgment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, J., & Dodds, J. C. (1975). Managerial decision making. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. A., & Miller, M. K. (1999). Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making. Academy of Management Executive, 13(4), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Team effectiveness and competencies. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (pp. 1383–1384). London/New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creative process. Creativity and Innovation, 15(1), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. J. (1967). The nature of explanation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003a). Task versus relationship conflict: Team performance, and team member satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C., & Weingart, L. (2003b). Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettman, D. J. (2001). An investigation of the shared mental model construct in the context of a complex team task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2007). Social intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1976). Group influences on individuals. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Business School. (2006). Decision making: 5 steps to better results. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Business School. (2008). Making decisions: Expert solutions to everyday challenges. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Terrell, J. (2008). The emotionally intelligent team. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, D. J., & Harvey, N. (2004). Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Letsky, M. P. (2008). Macrocognition in teams: Theories and methodologies. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P. (2010). Handbook on decision making: Vol 1: Techniques and applications. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Jain, L. C., & Zhang, G. (2012). Handbook on decision making: Vol 2: Risk management in decision making. Berlin/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, P. (2001). The performance factor: Unlocking the secrets of teamwork. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, A. G., & Wilson, M. J. (1982). Decision making: Approaches and analysis. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press ND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, P. E. (1983). Decision making: Proven methods for better decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C., & Wilson, D. C. (2010). Handbook of decision making. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. (1994). Crossfunctional teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., & Klein, G. (2001). Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2001). Group development: A review of the literature and a commentary on future research directions. Group Facilitation, 3, 14–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, D. R. (2007). Transforming performance measurement: Rethinking the way we measure and drive organizational success. New York: AMACOM: A Division of American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1996). The role of shared mental models in developing team situational awareness: Implications for training. Training Research Journal, 2, 85–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowets, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41(1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straw, J., & Cerier, A. B. (2002). The 4-dimensional manager: Disc strategies for managing different people in the best ways. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teale, M. (2003). Management decision making: Towards an integrated approach. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs, S. (1995). A systems approach to small group interaction. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welins, R., Byham, W., & Dixon, G. (1994). Inside teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S. A. (1990). Facilitating training groups: A guide to leadership and verbal intervention skills. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S. A. (1994a). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S. A. (1994b). The group development questionnaire: A manual for professionals. Provincetown, MA: GDQ Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group development across time: Reality or illusion? Small Group Research, 34(2), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Aartsengel, A., Kurtoglu, S. (2013). Team Development and Management. In: A Guide to Continuous Improvement Transformation. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35904-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics