Developing Conservation Approaches to Living Heritage at Angkor: The Conservation of the Statue of Ta Reach

Chapter
Part of the Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context book series (TRANSCULT)

Abstract

Changes in religion and politics tend to have an impact on heritage that is usually clear and easily identifiable. Changes in perception and conservation approaches can be less easy to identify but can have as great an impact. This article explores the change in approach to conservation through the history of the temple of Angkor Wat and how this and other sites have always been strongly influenced by the political and religious climate of the time. The specific example of the conservation of an important statue in the western gate of the third enclosure of the temple carried out in 2003, provides a concrete example of how the archaeological/scientific approach to conservation can develop into a more integrated and holistic approach that is compatible with both the requirements of the local community as well as the heritage community.

Keywords

Conservation Cultural heritage Living heritage Archaeology Angkor Wat 

References

  1. Baillie, Britt. 2007. “Conservation of the Sacred Site at Angkor Wat: Further Reflections on Living Heritage”. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 8: 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouillevaux, Charles Émile. 1858. Voyage dans l’Indo-Chine 1848–1856. Paris: Victor Palmé.Google Scholar
  3. Clavir, Miriam. 1994. “Preserving Conceptual Integrity: Ethics and Theory in Preventive Conservation.” In Preventive Conservation Practice, Theory and Research. Preprints of the Ottawa Congress [of ICC], 1216 September 1994, edited by Ashok Roy and Perry Smith, 53–57. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works.Google Scholar
  4. Eastop, Diana. 2003. “The Biography of Objects: A Tool for Analysing and Object’s Significance.” In International Workshop on Flexible Materials in Asian Collections, Exchange of Approaches to Conservation, Presentation and Use, April 7th–25th, 2003, 100–113. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Museums and Antiquities.Google Scholar
  5. Jokilehto, Jukka. 1999. History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Levitz, Saveros. 1970. “Textes en Khmer moyen. Inscriptions modernes d’Angkor 2 et 3.” Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient LVII: 99–126.Google Scholar
  7. Miura, Keiko. 2005. “Conservation of a ‘Living Heritage Site’: A Contradiction in Terms? A Case Study of Angkor World Heritage Site”. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 7(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mouhot, Henri. 1989. Travels in Siam, Cambodia, and Laos, 18581860. New York: Oxford University Press. First published in a different version in Mouhot, Henri. 1863. “Voyages dans les royaumes de Siam, de Cambodge, de Laos et autres parties de l’Indo-Chine.” Tour du Monde. Nouveau Journal des voyages, deuxième semèstre: 219–352. A second English version was published in 1864.Google Scholar
  9. Nara. 1994. Nara Conference on Authenticity. Accessed May, 2011. http://www.international.icomos.org/charters/nara_e.htm.
  10. Poncar, Jaroslav. 2006. Of Gods, Kings and Men: Bas-Reliefs of Angkor Wat and Bayon. London: Edition Panorama and Serindia Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Sitha, An. 2002. “Cambodian lacquer art and Khmer lacquer ware.” Lacquerware in Asia, Today and Yesterday, 165–172. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICCROMRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations