Conceptual Structures for STEM Data
Linked and open data is increasing being used by governments, business and administration. Awareness of the affordances and potential utility of open data is being raised by the emergence of a host of web-based and mobile applications.
Across the educational and research communities applications applying the principles linked data principles have emerged.
Systems developed and used by researchers and academics are most likely to be predominantly in the hands of the early adopters and current developments found in higher education tend to be atomized, yet there is potentially considerable advantage in associating and integrating applications for organisational, educational and administrative.
This paper presents an argument for how we can move from early adopters to early majority, and at the same time presents a roadmap which will outline some of the significant challenges which remain to be addressed.
Keywordslinked data open data semantic annotation higher education organizational change
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W.: The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 96–101 (2006)Google Scholar
- 5.Berners-Lee, T.: The process of designing things in a very large space: Keynote Presentation. In: WWW 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Shirky, C.: A group is its own worst enemy - A speech at ETech. Clay Shirky’s Writings About the Internet: Economics & Culture, Media & Community, Open Source (April 2003), http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html
- 7.O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0 – Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2005), http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (last accessed June 2010)
- 8.O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies 1, 17–37 (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Cabinet Office Open Data White Paper Unleashing the Potential Unleashing the Potential Open Data White Paper 52, London (2011), http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/open-data-white-paper-unleashing-potential
- 10.Shotton, D., Portwin, K., Klyne, G., Miles, A.: Adventures in semantic publishing: exemplar semantic enhancements of a research article. PLoS Computational Biology 5, e1000361 (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Koper, R.: Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective the pedagogical meta-model behind EML (2001)Google Scholar
- 14.IEEE Learning Standards Committee (LTSC) IEEE P1484.12 Learning Object Metadata Working Group; WG12, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/
- 15.Campbell, L.M.: UK Learning Object Metadata Core Working Draft Version 0.3 1204 (2004)Google Scholar
- 16.Tattersall, C.: Comparing Educational Modelling Languages on a CaseStudy: An Approach using IMS Learning Design. In: Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 1154–1155 (2006)Google Scholar
- 17.Long, P., Siemens, G.: Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. Educause Review 46, 31–40 (2011)Google Scholar
- 18.Siemens, G.: Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2, 1–8 (2005)Google Scholar
- 19.Siemens, G., Downes, S.: Connectivism and connective knowledge: Course delivered at University of Manitoba (September-November 2008), http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/connectivism/
- 20.Laurillard, D.: Rethinking University Teaching: a Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. Routledge, London (1993)Google Scholar
- 21.Siemens, G.: Learning Analytics: Envisioning a Research Discipline and a Domain of Practice. In: Second International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2012), pp. 4–8 (2012)Google Scholar
- 22.Siemens, G., Gasavic, D.: Learning and Knowledge Analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 15, 1–2 (2012)Google Scholar
- 23.Biggs, J.: Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. Open University Press in Association with The Society for Research into Higher Education, Buckingham (1999)Google Scholar
- 25.White, S., Liccardi, I.: Harnessing Insight into Disciplinary Differences to Refine e-learning Design. In: 36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 5–10 (2006), doi:10.1109/FIE.2006.322553Google Scholar
- 26.Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., Weal, M., White, S., Wills, G.: JISC - SemTech Project Report 28, Bristol (2009)Google Scholar
- 30.Cassel, L.N., Davies, G., LeBlanc, R., Snyder, L., Topi, H.: Using a Computing Ontology as a Foundation for Curriculum Development. In: SW-EL 2008 Conjunction with ITS 2008 (2008)Google Scholar