The Current Environmental Strategy Reporting Model: What can be Learned from Corporate Reports?

Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 3)


This paper explores the information on environmental strategy. Our interest is to understand whether corporate reports are useful to assess a firm’s environmental performance. We developed an empirical investigation of annual reports and social reports of large public firms. Using content analysis, our findings show major differences among companies in sensitive, manufacturing/service and financial sectors in terms of: integration of environmental issues into corporate reporting model; disclosure of environmental information. We offer some relevant insights on the overlooked relation between environmental disclosure and environmental performance and on the predominant use of environmental qualitative and/or non financial measures. The study shows that there is: a lack of consideration paid to the relationship between environmental strategies and environmental performance; high variability and limited standardization in environmental practices. Consequently the comparability of environmental performance is very low. Furthermore, integrating theoretical and empirical findings, we suggest some implications to improve environmental disclosure practices.


Environmental strategy  Environmental disclosure  Reporting model  Content analysis  


  1. 1.
    Siegel, D.S.: Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 23(3), 5–16 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aragon-Correa, J.A., Sharma, S.: A contingent resource based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Manage. Rev. 28(1), 71–88 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H.: Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg. Manage. J. 19(8), 729–753 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epstein, M.J., Roy, M.: Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Plan. 34(5), 585–604 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porter, M.E., van der Linde, C.: Green and competitive. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(5), 120–134 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perego, P., Hartmann, F.: Aligning performance measurement systems with strategy: The case of environmental strategy. Abacus 45(4), 395–428 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarkson, P.M., Overell, M.B., Chapple, L.: Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus 47(1), 27–60 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Staden, C.J., Hooks, J.: A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. Brit. Acc. Rev. 39(3), 197–210 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hughes, S.B., Anderson, A., Golden, S.: Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance? J. Account Public Policy 20(3), 217–240 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deegan, C.: Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—a theoretical foundation. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 15(3), 282–311 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gray, R., Kouhy, R., Lavers, S.: Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 8(2), 47–77 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck, C.A., Campbell, D., Shrives, P.J.: Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British-German context. Brit. Acc. Rev. 42(2), 207–222 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston (1984)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coda, V.: La valutazione della formula imprenditoriale. Sviluppo Organizzazione 82, 7–15 (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collis, D.J., Montgomery, C.: Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Banerjee, S.B.: Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. J. Bus. Res. 55(3), 177–191 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, S.Y., Rhee, S.K.: The change in corporate environmental strategies: A longitudinal empirical study. Manag. Decis. 45(2), 196–216 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharma, S., Enriques, I.: Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg. Manage. Ind. 26(2), 159–180 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freedman, M., Jaggi, B.: An analysis of the association between pollution disclosures and economic performance. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 1(2), 43–58 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ansoff, I.H.: Implanting Strategic Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berry, M.A., Rondinelli, D.A.: Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Acad. Manage. Executive 12(2), 38–50 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hart, S.L.: Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(1), 66–76 (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marcus, A.A., Fremeth, A.R.: Green management matters regardless. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 23(3), 17–26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., Narasimhan, R.: An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J. Oper. Manage. 25(5), 998–1014 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holland, L., Boon Foo, Y.: Differences in environmental reporting practices in the U.K. and the U.S.: The legal and regulatory context. Brit. Acc. Rev. 35(1), 1–18 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kolk, A., Walhain, S., van de Wateringen, S.: Environmental reporting by the fortune global 250: Exploring the influence of nationality and sector. Bus. Strategy Env. 10(1), 15–28 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cowen, S., Ferreri, L., Parker, L.: The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Acc. Organ. Soc. 12(2), 111–122 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patten, D.M.: The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Acc. Organ. Soc. 27(8), 763–773 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ullman, A.E.: Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance of US firms. Acad. Manage. Rev. 10(3), 540–557 (1985)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Milne, M.J., Adler, R.W.: Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 12(2), 237–256 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deegan, C., Rankin, M.: Do Australian corporate report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the environmental protection authority. Acc. Auditing Accountability 9(2), 50–67 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilmshurst, T.D., Frost, G.R.: Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Acc. Auditing Accountability 13(1), 10–26 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guthrie, J.E., Parker, L.D.: A quarter of a century of performance auditing in the Australian federal public sector: A malleable masque. Abacus 35(3), 302–332 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guthrie, J., Abeysekera, I.: Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into social and environmental disclosure: What is new? J. Hum. Resour. Costing Acc. 10(2), 114–126 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Williams, S.M.: Voluntary environmental and social accounting disclosure practices in the Asia-pacific region: An international empirical test of political economy theory. Int. J. Acc. 34, 209–238 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Abbott, W.F., Monsen, R.J.: On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Acad. Manage. Rev. 22(3), 501–515 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Campbell, D.: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies—a research note. Brit. Acc. Rev. 36(1), 107–117 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Deegan, C., Rankin, M., Voght, P.: Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Acc. Forum 24(1), 101–130 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maali, B., Casson, P., Napier, C.: Social reporting by Islamic banks. Abacus 42(2), 266–289 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wiseman, J.: An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Acc. Organ. Soc. 7(1), 53–63 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brammer, S., Pavelin, S.: Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Bus. Strategy Env. 17(2), 120–136 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Quagli, A., Teodori, C.: L’Informativa Volontaria per Settori di Attività. Franco Angeli, Milano (2005)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Adams, C., Hill, W.Y., Roberts, C.B.: Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behavior. Brit. Acc. Rev. 30(1), 1–21 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Richardson, G.D., Vasvari, F.P.: Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Acc. Organ. Soc. 33(4–5), 303–327 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wheeler, D., Elkington, J.: The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication. Bus. Strategy. Env. 10(1), 1–14 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Epstein, M.J., Freedman, M.: Social disclosure and the individual investor. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 7(4), 94–109 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cormier, D., Gordon, I.M.: An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 14(5), 587–616 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Andersen, B., Fagerhaug, T.: Green performance measurement’. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Meas. 1(2), 171–185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bebbington, J., Gray, R.: An account of sustainability: Failure, success and reconceptualization. Crit. Perspect. Acc. 12(5), 557–588 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bennet, M., James, P., Klinkers, L.: Sustainable Measures: Evaluation and Reporting of Environmental and Social Performance. Greenleaf Publishing, UK (1999)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gamble, G., Hsu, K., Kite, D., Radtke, R.: Environmental disclosures in annual reports and 10 Ks, an examination. Acc. Horiz. 9(3), 34–54 (1995)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Harte, G., Owen, D.: Environmental disclosures in the annual reports of British companies: A research note. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 4(3), 51–61 (1991)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fekrat, M., Inclan, C., Petroni, D.: Corporate environmental disclosures: Competitive disclosure hypothesis using 1991 annual report data. Int. J. Acc. 31(2), 175–195 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Deegan, C., Gordon, B.: A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Acc. Bus. Res. 26(3), 187–199 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Frost, G.R.: The introduction of mandatory environmental reporting guidelines: Australian evidence. Abacus 43(2), 190–216 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Global environment management initiative (GEMI), environment: Value to business (1998)
  57. 57.
    Habler, R., Reinhardt, D.: Environmental-Rating: An Indicator of Corporate Environmental Performance: An Introduction to the Methodology, Greener Management International, vol. 29 (spring), pp. 18–26 (2000)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ilinitch, A.Y., Soderstrom, N.S., Thomas, T.E.: Measuring corporate environmental performance. J. Acc. Public Policy 17(4–5), 383–408 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tyteca, D., Carlens, J., Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Wehrmeyer, W., Wagner, M.: Corporate environmental performance evaluation: Evidence from the MEPI project. Bus. Strategy Env. 11(1), 1–13 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili (CNDCEC): La relazione sulla gestione—Art. 2428 Codice Civile. (2009)
  61. 61.
    Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili (CNDCEC): Informativa sull’ambiente e sul personale nella Relazione sulla gestione. (2011)
  62. 62.
    Global reporting initiative (GRI): G3 guidelines. GRI, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sroufe, R., Montabon, F., Narasimhan, F., Wang, X.: Environmental management practices: A framework. Greener Manage. Int. 40 (winter), 23–44 (2003)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lucas, M.T.: Understanding environmental management practices: Integrating views from strategic management and ecological economics. Bus. Strategy Env. 19(8), 543–556 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Xie, S., Hayase, K.: Corporate environmental performance evaluation: A measurement model and a new concept. Bus. Strategy Env. 16(2), 148–168 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bertini, U.: Scritti di Politica Aziendale. Giappichelli, Torino (1995)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Micheli, P., Manzoni, J.F.: Strategic performance measurement: Benefits, limitations and paradoxes. Long Range Plan. 43(4), 465–476 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Epstein, M.J., Roy, M.: Managing corporate environmental performance: A multinational perspective. Eur. Manage. Rev. 16(3), 284–296 (1998)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Simons, R., Davila, A., Kaplan, R.S.: Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Andrei, P., Pesci, C.: L’area di Riferimento del Bilancio Socio-Ambientale nei Gruppi Aziendali: Spunti Critici di Riflessione Emergenti da un’Indagine Empirica. Financial reporting, vol. 1(2), pp. 45–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Noci, G.: Environmental reporting in Italy: Current practice and future developments. Bus. Strategy. Env. 9(4), 211–223 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Striukova, L., Unermann, J., Guthrie, J.: Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: Evidence from UK companies. Brit. Acc. Rev. 40(4), 297–313 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Neu, D., Warsame, H., Pedwell, K.: Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Acc. Organ. Soc. 23(3), 265–282 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Jones, K., Alabaster, T., Hetherington, K.: Internet-Based Environmental Reporting: Current Trends. Greener Manage. Int. 26 (summer), 69–90 (1999)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., Ricceri, F.: Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into capital reporting. J. Intellect. Capital 5(2), 282–293 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Beattie, V., Thomson, S.J.: Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosures. Acc. Forum 31(2), 129–163 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Unermann, J.: Methodological issues-reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Acc. Auditing. Accountability J. 13(5), 667–681 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Krippendorf, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (2004)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Guthrie, J., Parker, L.: Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Adv. Public Interest Acc. 3, 159–173 (1990)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hackstone, D., Milne, M.J.: Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Auditing Acc. Accountability J. 9(1), 77–108 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bowen, F.E.: Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational responsiveness? Bus. Strategy. Env. 9(2), 92–107 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Morris, S.: Environmental pollution and competitive advantage: An exploratory study of U.S. industrial-goods manufacturers. The Academy of Management Conference Proceedings. The Academy of Management, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Hoffman, A.J.: Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Acad. Manage. J. 42(4), 351–371 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R.: Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concept and Practice. Sheffield, Greenleaf (2000)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Magness, V.: Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Acc. Auditing Accountability J. 19(4), 540–563 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Boutin-Dufresne, F., Savaria, P.: Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. J. Investing 13(1), 57–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Waddock, S., Graves, S.: Finding the link between stakeholder relations and quality of management. J. Investing 6(4), 20–25 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    De Villiers, C., van Staden, C.J.: Shareholders’ requirements for corporate environmental disclosures: A cross country comparison. Brit. Acc. Rev. 42(4), 227–240 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business StudiesUniversity of Naples ParthenopeNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations