Advertisement

Mandatory Compliance in Transparency of Public Administration

  • Massimo De Angelis
  • Maria Guerra
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 3)

Abstract

The Italian legislator has acted as a promoter to develop a new culture in the public sector oriented to transparency and to stakeholder engagement. Public institutions (PA) have been stirred to publish a wide range of institutional data on their website to allow citizens to be aware of the activity carried out by these institutions and to monitor how public funds are used (accountability). The aim of this research is verify if PA are comply with the law on transparency. The research shows that a better level of transparency is achieved when it is required by law, but the requirements not directly connected with law, such as suggestions to promote usability and interactivity of website, have a low level of accomplishment.

Keywords

Transparency Public administration Public institutions Accounting information systems Website Mandatory compliance Decree 150/2009 

References

  1. 1.
    Lubello, V.: L’Open Government negli Stati Uniti d’America tra il Freedom of Information Act e il Bazar. Informatica e Diritto 1–2, 371–388 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ponti, B.: Open data and transparency: A paradigm shift. Informatica e Diritto 1–2, 305–320 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 78(I), 50–73 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armstrong, C.L.: Providing a clearer view: an examination of transparency on local government websites. Gov. Inf. Quart. 28, 11–16 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DigitPA, Dipartimento per la Funzione Pubblica (PCM), Dipartimento per la Digitalizzazione e l’Innovazione Tecnologica (PCM), FormezPA: Linee Guida per i Siti Web delle PA (2011). http://www.funzionepubblica.gov.it
  6. 6.
    Searson, E.M., Johnson, M.A.: Transparency laws and interactive public relations: An analysis of Latin American Government web sites. Public Relat. Rev. 36, 120–126 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Funk, W.: Public participation and transparency in administrative law-Three examples as an object lesson. Lewis & Clark Law School legal research paper series, vol. 1, pp. 171–198 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heikkila, T., Roussin, K.: Citizen involvement and performance management in special-purpose governments. Public Adm. Rev. 67, 238–248 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peréz, C.C., Hernandez, A.M.L., Bolivar, M.P.R.: Citizens’ access to on-line governmental financial information: Practices in the European Union Countries. Gov. Inf. Quart. 22, 258–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armstrong, E.: Integrity, transparency and accountability in Public administration: Recent trends, regional and international developments and emerging issues. Economic & Social Affairs, Report, United Nations (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Welch, E.W., Hinnant, C.C., Moon, M.J.: Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 15(3), 371–391 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salvioni, D.M., Teodori, C.: Internet e Comunicazione Economico-Finanziaria. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quagli, A.: Internet e la Comunicazione Finanziaria. Franco Angeli, Milano (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Welch, E.W.: Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments. Public Adm. Rev. 72(4), 562–571 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonsón, E., Escobar, T.: Digital reporting in Eastern Europe: An empirical study. Int. J. Acc. Inf. Syst. 7, 299–318 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huizingh, E.K.R.E.: The content and design of web sites: An empirical study. Inf. Manage. 37, 123–134 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pina, V., Torres, L., Royo, S.: Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the eu regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Adm. 85(2), 449–472 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yuan, L., Xi, C., Xiaoyi, W.: Evaluating the readiness of government portal websites in china to adopt contemporary Public administration principles. Gov. Inf. Quart. 29, 403–412 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Behn, B.K., De Vries, D.D., Lin J.: The determinants of transparency in nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 26, 6–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Llopis, J., Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J.: Web pages as a tool for a strategic description of the Spanish largest firms. Inf. Process. Manage. 46, 320–330 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scott, J.K.: “E” the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government web sites support Public involvement? Public Adm. Rev. 66, 341–353 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stanescu, E.: A web services based architecture for improvement of the transparency and decision-making in Public administration. Paper. RoEduNet International Conference Iasi (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang, K., Pandey, S.K.: Further dissecting the black box of Citizen Participation: when does citizen involvement lead to good Outcomes? Public Adm. Rev. 71, 880–892 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wichowsky, A., Moynihan, D.P.: Measuring how administration shapes citizenship: A policy feedback perspective on performance management. Public Adm. Rev. 68, 908–920 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang, K.: Examining perceived honest performance reporting by Public Organizations: Bureaucratic politics and organizational practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 19, 81–105 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vigoda-Gadot, E., Mizrahi, S.: Public sector management and the democratic ethos: A 5-year study of key relationships in Israel. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18, 79–107 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang, K., Callahan, K.: Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Adm. Rev. 67, 249–264 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stewart, K.: Write the rules and win: Understanding Citizen participation game dynamics. Public Adm. Rev. 67, 1067–1076 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheung, Y.L., Jiang, P., Tan, W.: A transparency disclosure index measuring disclosures: Chinese listed companies. J. Acc. Public Policy 29, 259–280 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meijer, A.: Does transparency lead to more compliance? Critical remarks on the relation between transparency and compliance. Eur. Food Feed Law Rev. 5, 264–269 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blomgren, M.: The drive for transparency: Organizational field transformations in Swedish healthcare. Public Adm. 85(1), 67–82 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hood, C., Heald, D.: Transparency: The key to better governance? Public Adm. 86(2), 591–618 (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liem, S.I.: Constituents of transparency in Public Administration with reference to empirical findings from Estonia. Dissertation of the University of St. Gallen, Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and Social Sciences (HSG) (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mancini, D., Marchi, L.: Gestione Informatica dei dati aziendali. Franco Angeli Editore, Milano (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Welch, E.W., Wong, W.: Global information technology pressure and government accountability: The mediating effect of domestic context on website openness. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 11, 509–538 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jorge, S., Sá, P.M., Pattaro, A.F., Lourenço, R.P.: Local government financial transparency in Portugal and Italy: A comparative exploratory study on its determinants. In: 13th Biennial CIGAR Conference, Bridging Public Sector and Non-Profit Sector Accounting, Ghent (Belgium) (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    James, O.: Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 21, 399–418 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Karsten, S., Visscher, A.J., Dijkstra, A.B., Veenstra, R.: Towards standards for the publication of performance indicators in the public sector: The case of schools. Public Adm. 88(1), 90–112 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Curtin, D., Meijer, A.J.: Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? A critical analysis of European Union policy documents. Inf. Polity 11, 109–122 (2006)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Amici, M., Meneguzzo, M., Matei, L., Mititelu, C.: Evaluation and transparency in PA modernization: monitoring the main mechanisms in Italy and Romania. Academic Public Administration Studies. http://www.apas.admpubl.snspa.ro
  41. 41.
    De Vivo, M.C., Polzonetti, A., Tapanelli, P.: Open Data, Business Intelligence e Governance nella Pubblica Amministrazione. Informatica e Diritto 1–2, 239–262 (2011)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tantardini, M., Galli, D.: Performance measurement in central government administrations: A comparative analysis through Italian lenses. In: Annual Conference of EGPA (2011)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Turri, M.: Il percorso della Valutazione e Controllo nei Ministeri Italiani. Serie Economia e Istituzioni, Liuc Papers, p. 233 (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ruffini, R.: Trasparenza e Performance: il Caso dei Comuni dell’Iowa. Risorse Umane nella Pubblica Amministrazione 3, 153–168 (2010)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brancasi, A.: La Contabilità come Fonte di Conoscibilità dei Dati e Precondizione di Trasparenza. In: Merloni, F. (eds.) La Trasparenze Amministrativa, Giuffré (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    D’Amico, D., Dominici, G., Nocera, R.: I Siti Web della PA–Premio Trasparenza 2011, Forum PA (2011)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Commissione Indipendente per la Valutazione, la Trasparenza e l’Integrità delle Pubbliche Amministrazioni, Monitoraggio Programmi Triennali per la Trasparenza e l’Integrità (2011). http://www.civit.it
  48. 48.
    Formez PA, Valutazione e Trasparenza nelle Pubbliche Amministrazioni. Primo monitoraggio sull’Attuazione del D. Lgs. no. 150/2009 nelle Amministrazioni Centrali e Regionali (2011). http://www.formez.it
  49. 49.
    Dipartimento della Funzione Pubblica, Relazione al Parlamento Italiano sullo della Pubblica Amministrazione (2009). http://www.funzionepubblica.gov.it
  50. 50.
    Mancini, D., Ferruzzi, C., De Angelis, M.: The mandatory change of AIS: A theoretical framework of the behaviour of Italian research institutions. In: D’Atri, A., Ferrara, M.M., George, J.F., Spagnoletti, P. (eds.) Information Technology and Innovation Trends in Organizations. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Corsi, K., Mancini, D.: The AIS compliance with law: An interpretative framework for Italian listed companies. In: D’Atri, A., Ferrara, M., George, J.F., Spagnoletti, P. (eds.) Information Technology and Innovation Trends in Organizations. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Al-Akra, M., Eddie, I.A., Ali, M.J.: The influence of the introduction of accounting disclosure regulation on mandatory disclosure compliance: Evidence from Jordan. Brit. Acc. Rev. 42, 170–186 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Akhtaruddin, M.: Corporate mandatory disclosure practices in Bangladesh. Int. J. Acc. 40, 399–422 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kim, S., Park, J.H., Wertz, E.K.: Expectation gaps between stakeholders and web-based corporate public relation efforts: Focusing on Fortune 500 Corporate Web Sites. Public Rel. Rev. 36, 215–221 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Parthenope University of NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations