Putting IS and Organizational Change into Context: The Pros and Cons in Kibernetes

  • Daniela Rupo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 3)


Based upon the framework of integrated information systems, this chapter aims to investigate the linkage between organizational evolution and the development of the infrastructure for management accounting in a specific context. The chapter analyses how the management accounting system is implemented, and the main strengths and weaknesses of the adopted solution, within Kibernetes RC, a software house belonging to a leading Italian group focused on public agencies. The software house has been committed in the last 2 years to the internal development of a specific management accounting system to drive the change from a small entity based on a centralized decision making model toward a medium-sized organization based on empowerment and delegation. Though findings deriving from the case study cannot be generalized, they provide insights in relation to the suitability of IS to achieve desirable effects of economic performance and social change within the organization.


Accounting information systems (AIS) Management accounting  Organizational change  Integrated information systems Case study  


  1. 1.
    Rom, A., Rhode, C.: Management accounting and integrated information systems: A literature review. Int. J. Accounting Syst 8, 4068 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Booth, P., Matolcsy, Z., Wieder, B.: Integrated information systems (ERPSystems) and accounting practise—the Australian experience. Paper 3rd European Conference on Accounting Information Systems, Munich, (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dechow, N., Mouritzen, J.: Enterprise resource planning systems, management control and the quest for integration. Accounting Organiz. Soc. 30, 691–733 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper, R., Kaplan, R.S.: The promise–and peril–of integrated cost systems. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(4), 109–119 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chrisanthi, A.: The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Info Syst. J. 11, 43–63 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quinn, R.E., Cameron, K.: Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria for effectiveness: some preliminary evidence. Manage. Sci. 29(1), 33–51 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abernethy, M.A., Bouwens, J., van Lent, L.: Leadership and control system design. Manage. Accounting Res. 21, 2–16 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jong-Min, C.: The effects of user participation on the design of accounting information systems. Inf. Manage. 34, 185–198 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferguson, C., Seow, P.: Accounting information systems research over the past decade: Past and future trends. Accounting Finance 51, 235–251 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods, Third edition edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tiwana, A.: Systems development ambidexterity: explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 27(2), 87–126 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations