Advertisement

Coursework Peer Reviews Increase Students’ Motivation and Quality of Learning

  • Vadim Ermolayev
  • Natalya Keberle
  • Sergey Borue
Conference paper
  • 558 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 347)

Abstract

This chapter reports about a pedagogical experiment at Zaporozhye National University (ZNU) aiming at improving students’ motivation and learning quality in our Computer Science Bachelor program. The major novelty in teaching and learning practice introduced in the experiment was the use of peer evaluation for the assessment of coursework reports in two disciplines – one in the second and the other in the fourth year of study. The results were compared to the historical data collected in the previous 3-4 years for which traditional assessment by instructors was applied. Our experiment proved that constructively exploiting students’ aspirations for informal leadership and incurred competition is effective and yields some increase in motivation to learn and learning quality. The assessments were also subjectively regarded as more clear and better justified by the students involved in the experiment. A good side effect is also that the students learn the working patterns broadly used by professionals in their field in academia and industry for making qualitative and unbiased peer evaluations.

Keywords

Incentive motivation learning quality peer evaluation Computer Science Bachelor program coursework 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bound, J., Lovenheim, M.F., Turner, S.: Why Have College Completion Rates Declined? An Analysis of Changing Student Preparation and Collegiate Resources. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2(3), 129–157 (2010), doi:10.1257/app.2.3.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark, P.B., Wilson, J.Q.: Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 6(2), 129–166 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Middleton, J.A., Photini, A.: Spanias: Motivation for Achievement in Mathematics: Findings, Generalizations, and Criticisms of the Research. J. Research in Mathematics Education 30(1), 65–88 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ames, C.: Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educational Psychology 84, 261–271 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Middleton, J.A.: A Study of Intrinsic Motivation in the Mathematics Classroom: A Personal Constructs Approach. J. Research in Mathematics Education 26, 254–279 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramirez-Iniguez, R., Canton, U.: Understanding Motivation in Large Groups of Engineering and Computing Students. In: Proc. of Engineering Education Inspiring the Next Generation of Engineers (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wong, S.H.S.: Motivating Students to Learn through Good and Helpful Coursework Feedback. In: Proc. Engineering Education Inspiring the Next Generation of Engineers (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forte, A., Bruckman, A.: Why do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing. In: Proc. 41st Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences, HICSS (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wasko, M., Faraj, S.: It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J. Strategic Information Systems 9, 155–173 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cuel, R., Morozova, O., Rohde, M., Simperl, E., Siorpaes, K., Tokarchuk, O., Wiedenhoefer, T., Yetim, F., Zamarian, M.: Motivation Mechanisms for Participation in Human-Driven Semantic Content Creation. Int. J. of Knowledge Engineering and Data Mining 1(4), 331–349 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Likert, R.: A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140, 1–55 (1932)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vadim Ermolayev
    • 1
  • Natalya Keberle
    • 1
  • Sergey Borue
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologiesZaporozhye National UniversityZaporozhyeUkraine

Personalised recommendations