Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 868))

  • 2740 Accesses

Abstract

The great revolution of the nineteenth century started with the theory of special and general relativity and culminated in quantum theory. However, up to date, there are still some fundamental issues with quantum theory that are, yet, to be solved. Nonetheless, a great deal of effort in fundamental physics is spent on an elusive theory of quantum gravity, which is an attempt to combine the two above mentioned theories which seem, as they have been formulated, to be incompatible. In the last five decades various attempts to formulate such a theory of quantum gravity have been made, but none has fully succeeded in becoming the quantum theory of gravity. One possibility of the failure for reaching an agreement on a theory of quantum gravity might be the presence of unresolved fundamental issues already present in quantum theory, first pointed out by John Bell in (Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, 2004; Toposes and Local Set Theories, 1988) (1987) and subsequently by others. Since then the scientific community has been split in two depending on whether or not the interpretation of quantum theory is regarded as problematic. In fact as a reaction to Bell’s ideas many new interpretations of quantum theory started emerging, each motivated from the belief that the conceptual framework of quantum theory was wrong or incomplete. The major examples of alternative formulations of quantum theory are: (i) many-worlds, (ii) many minds, (iii) consistent histories and (iv) hidden-variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This view is also supported by the fact that, effectively, isolated systems are idealisations and are not very frequent in practice, unless of course one is studying cosmology where the universe itself is an isolated system.

  2. 2.

    By a ‘realist’ theory we mean one in which the following conditions are satisfied: (i) propositions form a Boolean algebra; and (ii) propositions can always be assessed to be either true or false. As it will be delineated in the following, in the topos approach to quantum theory both of these conditions are relaxed, leading to what Isham and Döring called a neo-realist theory.

  3. 3.

    The reason is, roughly, because the internal logic of the topos used to describe quantum theory is multi-valued while the internal logic of the topos used to describe classical theory is bi-valued.

  4. 4.

    Roughly the Kochen-Specker Theorem asserts that, if the dimension of \(\mathcal {H}\) is greater than 2, then it is not possible to assign values to all physical quantities, at the same time, in a consistent way. See Chap. 3.

References

  1. J.S. Bell, Against ‘measurement’ (Physics World, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Everett, Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 141–149 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. B. DeWitt, N. Graham, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47(10), 777–780 (1935)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Bohr, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 48, 700 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bohm, A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Bohm, A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables. II. Phys. Rev. 85, 180–193 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Lockwood, Mind, Brain and the Quantum: The Compound I (Blackwell, Oxford, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. N.G. van Kampen, The scandal of quantum mechanics. Am. J. Phys. 76, 989 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Peierls, Selected Scientific Papers of Sir Rudolf Peierls. World Scientific Series in 20th Century Physics, vol. 19 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Gottfried, Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, Elmsford, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  12. V.F. Lenzen, in Philosophical Problems of the Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Proceedings. Second Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statist. and Prob. (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1951), pp. 567–579

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. C.J. Isham, J. Butterfield, A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: I. Quantum states as generalized valuations (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9803055

  15. J. Butterfield, C.J. Isham, A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: II. Conceptual aspects, and classical analogues (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9808067

  16. J. Butterfield J. Hamilton, C.J. Isham, A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: III. Von Neumann algebras as the base category (1999). arXiv:quant-ph/9911020

  17. J.L. Bell, Toposes and Local Set Theories (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. C.J. Isham, Lectures on Quantum Theory, Mathematical and Structural Foundations (Imperial College Press, London, 1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Bub, Interpreting the Quantum World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. C.J. Isham, J. Butterfield, Some possible roles for topos theory in quantum theory and quantum gravity. Found. Phys. 30, 1707 (2000). arXiv:gr-qc/9910005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Doring, C.J. Isham, A topos foundation for theories of physics. I. Formal languages for physics. J. Math. Phys. 49, 053515 (2008). arXiv:quant-ph/0703060 [quant-ph]

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Doring, C.J. Isham, A topos foundation for theories of physics. II. Daseinisation and the liberation of quantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 49, 053516 (2008). arXiv:quant-ph/0703062 [quant-ph]

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Doring, C.J. Isham, A topos foundation for theories of physics. III. The representation of physical quantities with arrows. J. Math. Phys. 49, 053517 (2008). arXiv:quant-ph/0703064 [quant-ph]

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Doring, C.J. Isham, A topos foundation for theories of physics. IV. Categories of systems. J. Math. Phys. 49, 053518 (2008). arXiv:quant-ph/0703066 [quant-ph]

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Doring, C. Isham, ‘What is a thing?’: topos theory in the foundations of physics. arXiv:0803.0417 [quant-ph]

  26. A. Doring, Topos theory and ‘neo-realist’ quantum theory. arXiv:0712.4003 [quant-ph]

  27. C.J. Isham, Is it true or is it false; or somewhere in between? The logic of quantum theory. Contemp. Phys. 46, 207 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Flori, Review of the topos approach to quantum theory. arXiv:1106.5660 [math-ph]

  29. C.J. Isham, Topos methods in the foundations of physics. arXiv:1004.3564 [quant-ph]

  30. C. Flori, Approaches to quantum gravity. arXiv:0911.2135 [gr-qc]

  31. M. Gell-Mann, J.B. Hartle, in Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, ed. by W. Zurek. SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. VIII (Addison Wesley, Reading, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Gell-Mann, J.B. Hartle, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technologies, ed. by S. Kobayashi, H. Ezawa, Y. Murayama, S. Nomura (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Gell-Mann, J.B. Hartle, in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on High Energy Physics, ed. by K.K. Phua, Y. Yamaguchi, Singapore, August 2–8 1990 (South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association and Physical Society of Japan) (Worlds Scientific, Singapore, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  34. R.B. Griffiths, Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. R.B. Griffiths, Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. I. Foundations. J. Stat. Phys. 53, 893 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. R.B. Griffiths, Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. II. Interferences and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. J. Stat. Phys. 53, 933 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R.B. Griffiths, Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. III. Classical limit and irreversibility. J. Stat. Phys. 53, 957 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R.B. Griffiths, Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. IV. Projectors in semiclassical physics. J. Stat. Phys. 57, 357 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R.B. Griffiths, The consistency of consistent histories: a reply to d’Espagnat. Found. Phys. 23, 1601 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. R. Omnes, Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 339–382 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flori, C. (2013). Introduction. In: A First Course in Topos Quantum Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 868. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35713-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics