Advertisement

Quantum-Like Representation of Irrational Inference

  • Masanari Asano
  • Irina Basieva
  • Andrei Khrennikov
  • Masanori Ohya
  • Yoshiharu Tanaka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7620)

Abstract

In this paper we develop a general quantum-like representation of decision making. Here quantum-like representation is based on linear algebra, the von Neumann-Lüders projection postulate, Born’s rule, and the quantum representation of the state space of a composite system by the tensor product. Our approach generalizes in a natural way the classical Bayesian inference and explains irrational (non-Bayesian) inference biased by psychological factors. For the mathematical description of irrational inference, we use the lifting map, which is important concept to discuss a general quantum dynamics called adaptive dynamics.

Keywords

quantum-like cognitive model (non-)Bayesian inference lifting map 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Accardi, L., Ohya, M.: Compound channels, transition expectations and liftings. Applied Mathematics Optimization 39, 33–59 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Accardi, L., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M.: Quantum Markov model for data from Shafir-Tversky experiments in cognitive psychology. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 16, 371–385 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asano, M., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M.: Quantum-like model for decision making process in two players game, A Non-Kolmogorovian model. Found. Phys. 41, 538–548 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I.: On application of Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad equation in cognitive psychology. Open Systems & Information Dynamics 18(1), 55–69 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I.: Quantum-like Representation of Bayesian Updating. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Quantum Theory. American Institute of physics, vol. 1327, pp. 57–62 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I.: Quantum-like Dynamics of Decision-Making. Physica A (2011), doi:10.1016Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bar-Hillel, M.: The base rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica 44, 211–233 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Townsend, J.T.: Quantum dynamics of human decision making. J. Math. Psychology 50, 220–241 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Empirical Comparison of Markov and quantum models of decision making. J. Math. Psychology 53, 423–433 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Busemeyer, J.R., Trueblood, J.: Comparison of Quantum and Bayesian Inference Models. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5494, pp. 29–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Busemeyer, J.R., Pothos, E.M., Franco, R., Trueblood, J.S.: A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Psychological Review 118, 193–218 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheon, T., Takahashi, T.: Classical and quantum contents of solvable game theory on Hilbert space. Phys. Lett. A 348, 147–152 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheon, T., Takahashi, T.: Interference and inequality in quantum decision theory. Phys. Lett. A 375, 100–104 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Conte, E., Khrennikov, A., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Zbilut, J.P.: Mental states follow quantum mechanics during perception and cognition of ambiguous figures. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 16, 1–17 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conte, E., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Vitiello, F., Lopane, M., Khrennikov, A., Zbilut, J.P.: Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 31(5), 1076–1088 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Croson, R.: The Disjunction Effect and Reason-Based Choice in Games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 80, 118–133 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Danilov, V.I., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Measurable systems and behavioral sciences. Mathematical Social Sciences 55(3), 315–340 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Danilov, V.I., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty. Theory and Decision 68(1), 25–47 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dawes, R.M., Mirels, H.L., Gold, E., Schiavo, M.D.: Equating inverse probabilities in implicit personality judgments. Psychological Science 4, 396–400 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Franco, R.: The inverse fallacy and quantum formalism. In: Proceedings of the the Second Interaction Symposium (QI 2008), pp. 94–98 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Franco, R.: The conjunction fallacy and interference effects. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 415–422 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hamm, R.M.: Explanation for common responses to the blue/green cab probabilistic inference word problem. Psychological Reports 72, 219–242 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 3, 430–454 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80, 237–251 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khrennikov, A.: Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena. Found. of Physics 29, 1065–1098 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khrennikov, A.: On quantum-like probabilistic structure of mental information. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 11(3), 267–275 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khrennikov, A.: Quantum-like brain: Interference of minds. BioSystems 84, 225–241 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khrennikov, A., Haven, E.: Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: the use of probability interference and other concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53, 378–388 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khrennikov, A.: Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing. Biosystems 95, 179–187 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khrennikov, A.: Contextual approach to quantum formalism. Fundamental Theories of Physics. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khrennikov, A.: Ubiquitous quantum structure: from psychology to finance. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koehler, J.J.: The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, 1–53 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Zamir, S., Zwirn, H.: Type Indeterminancy: A model of the KT (Kahneman-Tversky)-man. J. Math. Psychol. 53(5), 349–361 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ohya, M.: Adaptive Dynamics and its Applications to Chaos and NPC Problem. In: QP-PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, Quantum Bio-Informatics 2007, vol. 21, pp. 181–216 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ohya, M., Volovich, I.: Mathematical foundations of quantum information and computation and its applications to nano- and bio-systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pollard, P., St Evans, J.B.T.: The role of representativeness in statistical inference. In: St Evans, J.B.T. (ed.) Thinking and Reasoning, pp. 309–330. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1983)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R.: A quantum probability explanation for violation of rational decision theory. Proc. Royal. Soc. B 276, 2171–2178 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shafir, E., Tversky, A.: Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology 24, 449–474 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tversky, A., Shafir, E.: The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science 3, 305–309 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Villejoubert, G., Mandel, D.: The inverse fallacy: An account of deviations from Bayes’s theorem and the additivity principle. Memory and Cognition 30(2), 171–178 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wolfe, C.R.: Information seeking on Bayesian conditional probability problems: A fuzzy-trace theory account. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8, 85–108 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masanari Asano
    • 1
  • Irina Basieva
    • 2
  • Andrei Khrennikov
    • 2
  • Masanori Ohya
    • 1
  • Yoshiharu Tanaka
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information SciencesTokyo University of ScienceNoda-shiJapan
  2. 2.International Center for Mathematical Modeling in Physics and Cognitive SciencesLinnaeus UniversityVäxjöSweden

Personalised recommendations