Skip to main content

Using Agent Importance to Combat Preference Manipulation in Group Decision Making

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 305))

Abstract

We consider a problem that can arise in group decision-making when the selection process is based upon a group preference function obtained by an aggregation of the individual preference functions of the group members. We observe the possibility of the individual agents strategically manipulating the information they provide so as to further their own goal of getting their most preferred alternative selected by the group. With this in mind we suggest ways of modifying the formulation of the group decision functions to discourage strategic manipulation by the participating agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1951)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Luce, R.D., Raiffa, H.: Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: Multiperson Decision Making Using Fuzzy Sets And Possibility Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kacprzyk, J., Nurmi, H., Fedrizzi, M.: Consensus Under Fuzziness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, Z., Yager, R.R.: Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18, 94–105 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Pereira, R.A.M., Brunelli, M.: The dynamics of consensus in group decision making: Investigating the pairwise interactions between fuzzy preferences. In: Greco, S., Pereira, R.A.M., Squillante, M., Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Preferences and Decisions. STUDFUZZ, vol. 257, pp. 159–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Pasi, G., Yager, R.R.: A majority guided aggregation operator in group decision making. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J., Beliakov, G. (eds.) Recent Developments in the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice. STUDFUZZ, vol. 265, pp. 111–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Yager, R.R.: Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi–agent decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Sets and Systems 9, 393–403 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Yager, R.R.: Decisions with ordinal preferences and importances. Kybernetes 9, 109–114 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Yager, R.R.: Extending Nash’s bargaining model to include importance for multiple objective decision making. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 10, 405–407 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Weighted minimum and maximum operations in fuzzy sets theory. Information Sciences 39, 205–210 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yager, R.R.: On the inclusion of importances in multi-criteria decision making in the fuzzy set framework. International Journal of Expert Systems: Research and Applications 5, 211–228 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yager, R.R.: A note on weighted queries in information retrieval systems. J. of the American Society of Information Sciences 38, 23–24 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pasi, G., Yager, R.R.: Modeling the concept of majority opinion in group decision making. Information Sciences 176, 390–414 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh, L.A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computing and Mathematics with Applications 9, 149–184 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J., Beliakov, G. (eds.): Recent Developments in the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice. STUDFUZZ, vol. 265. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yager, R.R.: On the inclusion of importances in OWA aggregations. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications, pp. 41–59. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald R. Yager .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yager, R.R. (2013). Using Agent Importance to Combat Preference Manipulation in Group Decision Making. In: Ventre, A., Maturo, A., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Multicriteria and Multiagent Decision Making with Applications to Economics and Social Sciences. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 305. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35635-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35635-3_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35634-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35635-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics