Study on Pathway of Administrative Discretion Standard
The justice was achieved in one case how to prevent the arbitrariness in the administrative discretion. It becomes current hot spot and core in practices of the social management and administrative. Based on the concept’s interpretation, value direction, and rule deduction of the administrative discretion standard that are standardized the existing discretion power and as compact as possible the space of the existing discretion power, we study on its pathway. And it is pointed out that it is applied to dealing with the power’s structure between individuals and societies on the micro side.
KeywordsAdministrative discretion standard The justice of individual case Concept’s interpretation Value direction Rule deduction
The research is supported by Research Fund of Southwestern University (NO. SWU1209301) and Humanities and Social sciences Research Fund of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (NO. RWSK-CQJY201101).
- 1.Yu L (2008) Tsinghua Law: Walking between norms and rigid–thoughts about the practice of administrative discretion standard in Jinhua District. 3(3):54–80Google Scholar
- 2.Bi H (2009) (Translated by) Commercial press in Beijing: discretion justice written by Kenneth Culp Davis (U.S.) 24(16):26–27 Google Scholar
- 3.Tina-hue Wang (2006) The problem about the basic theory of discretion standard. Zhejiang Acad J 12(6):89–95Google Scholar
- 4.The public information network of Chongqing municipal people’s government: the disposal specification of public security organs for the common policing alert [EB/OL] (October 31 2008) http://www.cq.gov.cn/subject/xzzfgg/zfdt/121229.html