Advertisement

Protocols for Applying Phytotechnologies in Metal-Contaminated Soils

  • Meri BarbafieriEmail author
  • Jan Japenga
  • Paul Romkens
  • Gianniantonio Petruzzelli
  • Francesca Pedron
Chapter
Part of the Soil Biology book series (SOILBIOL, volume 35)

Abstract

Contamination with heavy metals continues to pose a serious challenge for the remediation of polluted soil, as they are not degradable and must be physically removed. At present, most technologies used for removing heavy metals from the soil greatly affect the biogeochemical characteristics of the soil. In many cases, the soil can no longer be considered a useful and productive soil resource, and the treated soil has to be disposed of in landfills. Phytoremediation is the only solution that approaches the problem from an eco-sustainable point of view—it is environmentally friendly and relatively cheap. In this chapter, two phytotechnology approaches for remediating heavy metal-contaminated soil will be discussed, along with protocols for their implementation: phytoextraction and phytostabilization. Phytoremediation as a technique for rehabilitating heavy metal-polluted land therefore requires protocols and decision-support tools to assess the most appropriate approach, based on site-specific characteristics and requirements for soil status during and after remediation. Decisions have to be made on whether to use phytoextraction or phytostabilization, or even reject phytoremediation as a whole. Protocols and decision tools, from modeling and laboratory tests to full-blown feasibility studies, will be discussed.

Keywords

Heavy Metal Polluted Site Energy Crop Arsenic Removal Critical Success Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baker AJM, Brooks RR (1989) Terrestrial higher plants which hyper accumulate metallic elements–review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126Google Scholar
  2. Bañuelos G, Terry N, LeDuc DL, Pilon-Smits EAH, Mackey B (2011) Field trial of transgenic Indian mustard plants shows enhanced phytoremediation of selenium contaminated sediment. Environ Sci Technol 39:1771–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbafieri M (2000) The importance of nickel phytoavailable chemical species characterization in soil for phytoremediation applicability. Int J Phytoremediation 2:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbafieri M, Raffaelli K (2010) Manuale di applicabilità di tecnologie di Fitorimedio a suoli e sedimenti contaminati da metalli. Regione Emilia Romagna and ISE CNR Project ReportGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbafieri M, Tassi E (2010) Plant growth regulators for phytoremediation technologies. In: 20th International conference on plant growth substances (IPGSA), Tarragona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbafieri M, Lubrano L, Petruzzelli G (1996) Characterization of pollution at heavy metal contaminated sites: a proposal. Annali di Chimica 86:585–594Google Scholar
  7. Barbafieri M, Petruzzelli G, Tassi E, Ambrosini P, Patata L, Cecca GS, Pedron F (2010) Assisted mercury phyto-extraction in scale up tests: Microcosom-mesocosm-field. In: 11th International FZK/TNO conference on management of soil, groundwater and sediment, Salzburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbafieri M, Dadea C, Tassi E, Bretzel F, Fanfani L (2011) Heavy metals and native species uptake in a mining area in sardinia: discovering wild flora for phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediation 13:985–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbafieri M, Peralta-Videa J, Pedron F, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2012) Plant growth regulators and improvements in phytoremediation process efficiency: studies on metal contaminated soils. In: Anjum NA, Pereira ME, Ahmad I, Duarte AC, Umar S, Khan NA (eds) Phytotechnologies: remediation of environmental contaminants. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  10. Barciszewski J, Siboska G, Rattan SIS, Clark BFC (2000) Occurrence, biosynthesis and properties of kinetin (N6-furfuryladenine). Plant Growth Regul 32:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berti WR, Cunningham SD (2000) Phytostabilization of metals. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Blaylock MJ, Elless MP (2009) Phytoremediation of arsenic in residential soils: evaluating five years of field verification studies in Washington, DC. In: 6th Phytotechnologies international conference, St LouisGoogle Scholar
  13. Blaylock MJ, Salt DE, Dushenkow S, Zakharova O, Gussman C, Kapulnik Y, Ensley BD, Raskin I (1997) Enhanced accumulation of Pb in Indian Mustard by soil-applied chelating agents. Environ Sci Technol 31:860–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bolan NS, Park JH, Brett R, Naidu R, Huh KY (2011) Phytostabilization: a green approach to contaminant containment. Adv Agron 112:145–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooks RR (1998) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Brus DJ, Li Z, Song J, Koopmans GF, Temminghoff EJM, Yin X, Yao C, Zhang H, Luo Y, Japenga J (2009) Predictions of spatially averaged cadmium contents in rice grains in the Fuyang Vally P.R. China. J Environ Qual 38:1126–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cassina L, Tassi E, Morelli E, Giorgetti L, Remorini D, Chaney RL, Barbafieri M (2011) Exogenous cytokinin treatments of a Ni hyper-accumulator, Alyssum murale, grown in a serpentine soil: implications for phytoextraction. Int J Phytoremediation 13(S1):90–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cassina L, Tassi E, Pedron F, Petruzzelli G, Ambrosini P, Barbafieri M (2012) Using plant hormone and thioligand to improve phytoremediation of Hg-contaminated soil from a petrochemical plant. J Hazard Mater 231–232:36–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chaney RL, Malik M, Li YM, Brown SL, Brewer EP, Angle JS, Baker AJM (1997) Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:279–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clemens S (2006) Toxic metal accumulation, response to exposure and mechanism of tolerance in plants. Biochimie 88:1707–1719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conesa HM, Evangelou MWH, Robinson BH, Schulin R (2012) A critical view of current state of phytotechnologies to remediate soils: still a promising tool? ScientificWorldJournal. doi: 10.1100/2012/173829
  22. Cooper EM, Sims JT, Cunningham SD, Huang JW, Berti WR (1999) Chelate-assisted phytoextraction of lead from contaminated soils. J Environ Qual 28:1709–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Gregorio S, Barbafieri M, Lampis S, Sanangelantoni AM, Tassi E, Vallini G (2006) Combined application of Triton X-100 and Sinorhizobium sp. Pb002 inoculum for the improvement of lead phytoextraction by Brassica juncea in EDTA amended soil. Chemosphere 63:293–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dickinson NM, Baker AJM, Doronilla A, Laidlaw S, Reeves RD (2009) Phytoremediation of inorganics: realism and synergies. Int J Phytoremediation 11:97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Environmental Agency (2004) Model procedures for the management of land contamination contaminated land. Report 11. http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/PDF/SCHO0804BIBR-E-E.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2012
  26. European Union (2008) Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 1/5 January 2008 b concerning integrated prevention and control (29-1-2009)Google Scholar
  27. Evangelou MWH, Ebel M, Schaeffer A (2007) Chelate assisted phytoextraction of heavy metals from soil: effect, mechanism, toxicity, and fate of chelating agents. Chemosphere 68:989–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giansoldati V, Tassi E, Morelli E, Gabellieri E, Pedron F, Barbafieri M (2012) Nitrogen fertilizer improves boron phytoextraction by Brassica juncea grown in contaminated sediments and alleviates plant stress. Chemosphere 87:1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamon RE, McLaughlin MJ (2003) Use of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens for bioavailable contaminant stripping. In: Wenzel WW, Adriano DC, Alloway B, Doner HE, Keller C, Lepp NW, Naidu R, Pierzynski GM (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on the biogeochemistry of trace elements, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapustka LA (1997) Selection of phytotoxicity tests for use in ecological risk assessments. In: Wang W, Gorsuch JW, Hughes JS (eds) Plants for environmental studies. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  31. Keeling SM, Stewart RB, Anderson CWN, Robinson BH (2003) Nickel and cobalt phytoextraction by the hyperaccumulator Berkheya coddii: implications for polymetallic phytomining and phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediation 5:235–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koopmans GF, Romkens PFAM, Fokkema MJ, Song J, Luo Y, Japenga J, Zhao FJ (2008a) Feasibility of phytoextraction to remediate cadmium and zinc contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 156:905–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koopmans GF, Schenkeveld WDC, Song J, Luo Y, Japenga J, Temminghoff EJM (2008b) Influence of EDDS on metal speciation in soil extracts: measurement and mechanistic multicomponent modeling. Environ Sci Technol 42:1123–1130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koopmas GF, Romkens PFAM, Song J, Temminghoff EJM, Japenga J (2007) Predicting the phytoextraction duration to remediate heavy metal contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 181:355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kucharski R, Sas-Nowosielska A, Malkowski E, Japenga J, Kuperberg JM, Pogrzeba M, Krzyzak J (2005) The use of indigenous plant species and calcium phosphate for the stabilization of highly metal-polluted sites in southern Poland. Plant Soil 273:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. LaCoste C, Robinson BH, Brooks RR (2001) Thallium uptake by vegetables: its significance for human health, phytoremediation and phytomining. J Plant Nutr 24:1205–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Letham DS, Goodwin PB, Higgins TJV (1978) Phytohormones and related compounds: a comprehensive treatise. In: Letham DS, Goodwin PB, Higgins TJV (eds) Phytohormones and the development of higher plants, vol 2. Elsevier, North-Holland Biomedical Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Lombi E, Zhao FJ, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2001) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils: natural hyperaccumulation versus enhanced phytoextraction. J Environ Qual 30:1919–1926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lopez ML, Peralta-Videa JR, Parsons JG, Benitez T, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2007) Gibberellic acid, kinetin, and the mixture indole-3-acetic acid-kinetin assisted with EDTA induced lead hyperaccumulation in alfalfa plants. Environ Sci Technol 41:8165–8170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCutcheon SC, Jørgensen SE (2008) Phytoremediation. Encyclopedia of ecology, pp 2751–2766Google Scholar
  41. McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (2003) Phytoremediation, transformation and control of contaminants. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  42. McGrath PS, Zhao FJ (2003) Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:277–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meers E, Lamsal S, Vervaeke P, Hopgood M, Lust N, Tack FMG (2005) Availability of heavy metals for uptake by Salix viminalison a moderately contaminated dredged sediment disposal site. Environ Pollut 137:354–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mench M, Bussière S, Boisson-Gruppen J, Castaing E, Vangronsveld J, Ruttens A, De Koe T, Bleeker P, Assunção A, Manceau A (2003) Progress in remediation and revegetation of the barren Jales gold mine spoil after in situ treatments. Plant Soil 249:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mulligan CN, Yong RN (2004) Natural attenuation of contaminated soil. Environ Int 30:587–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nolan AL, Lombi E, McLaughlin MJ (2003) Metal bioaccumulation and toxicity in soils–why bother with speciation? Aust J Chem 56:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nowolsieska-Sas O, Kucharski R, Malkowski (2005) Feasibility studies for phytoremediation of metal contaminated soil. In: Margenis R, Schinner F (eds) Soil biology, vol. 5, Manual for soil analysis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  48. Ouzounidou G, Ilias I (2005) Hormone-induced protection of sunflower photosynthetic apparatus against copper toxicity. Biol Planta 49:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pedron F, Petruzzelli G, Barbafieri M, Tassi E (2009) Strategies to use phytoextraction in very acidic soil. Chemosphere 75:808–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pospisilova J, Synkova H, Rulcova J (2000) Cytokinins and water stress. Biol Planta 43:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raskin I (1995) Phytoextraction: the use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ Sci Technol 29:1232–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robinson BH, Mills TM, Petit D, Fung LE, Green SR, Clothier BE (2003a) Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: implication for phytoremediation. Plant Soil 227:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robinson BH, Fernández JE, Madejón P, Marañón T, Murillo JM, Green SR, Clothier BE (2003b) Phytoextraction: an assessment of biogeochemical and economic viability. Plant Soil 249:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rogers EE, Eide DJ, Guerinot ML (2000) Altered selectivity in an Arabidopsis metal transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12356–12360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Römkens PF, Guo HY, Chu CL, Liu TS, Chiang CF, Koopmans GF (2009) Characterization of soil heavy metal pools in paddy fields in Taiwan: chemical extraction and solid-solution partitioning. J Soils Sediments 9:216–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tassi E, Pedron F, Barbafieri M, Petruzzelli G (2004) Phosphate assisted phytoextraction in As contaminated soil. Eng Life Sci 4:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tassi E, Pouget J, Petruzzelli G, Barbafieri M (2008) The effects of exogenous plant growth regulators in the phytoextraction of heavy metals. Chemosphere 71:66–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tassi E, Pedron F, Barbafieri M (2011) Evaluating the absorption of boron by plants – a potential tool to remediate contaminated sediments from Cecina river basin in Italy. Water Air Soil Pollut 216:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. UNEP (2003) Phytotechnologies: a technical approach in environmental management. IETC Freshwater Management Series 7. http://www.unep.or.jp/ietc/Publications/Freshwater/FMS7/index.asp. Accessed 12 Sept 2012
  60. Van Nevel LL, Mertens JJ, Oorts KK, Verheyen KK (2007) Phytoextraction of metals from soils: how far from practice? Environ Pollut 150:34–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wahle U, Kordel W (1997) Development of analytical methods for the assessment of ecotoxicological relevant soil contamination. Part A - Development and improvement of soil extraction methods for the determination of the bioavailable parts of contaminants. Chemosphere 35:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Willschera S, Mirgorodskyb D, Jablonskia L, Ollivierb D, Mertenb D, Büchelb G, Wittiga J, Wernera P (2012) Field scale phytoremediation experiments on a heavy metal and uranium contaminated site, and further utilization of the plant residues. Hydrometallurgy. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2012.08.012
  63. Ye WL, Khan MA, McGrath SP, Fang-Jie ZFJ (2011) Phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated paddy soils with Pteris vittata markedly reduces arsenic uptake by rice. Environ Pollut 159:3739–3743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhao Y, Peralta-Videa JR, Lopez-Moreno ML, Ren M, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2011) Kinetin increases chromium absorption, modulates its distribution, and changes the activity of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase in Mexican Palo Verde. Environ Sci Technol 45:1082–1087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meri Barbafieri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jan Japenga
    • 2
  • Paul Romkens
    • 2
  • Gianniantonio Petruzzelli
    • 1
  • Francesca Pedron
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Section of PisaNational Research CouncilPisaItaly
  2. 2.Alterra-Wageningen UR, Soil Science CentreWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations