Skip to main content

Destruction and Diversity: Effects of Habitat Loss on Ecological Communities

  • 3045 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNMBIOS,volume 2071)

Abstract

In many parts of the world habitat is being destroyed at an alarming rate. Many major ecosystems have lost more than half of their original area, and some much more than this [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (2005); World Wildlife Fund, Insight into Europe’s Forest Protection (2001)]. At the same time biodiversity is fast declining [Butchart et al., Science 328:1164–1168, 2010]. Habitat loss is a major threat to biodiversity [Brooks et al., Conserv. Biol. 16:909–923, 2002; Baillie et al., 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: A Global Assessment (2004)], but the effects of the destruction are sometimes difficult to predict [Debinski and Holt, Conserv. Biol. 14:342–355, 2000; Prugh et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:20770–20775, 2008; Hanski, AMBIO 40:248–255, 2011], and the effect of habitat loss and fragmentation on predator–prey interactions in particular is unclear [Ryall and Fahrig, Ecology 87:1086–1093, 2006]. One reason for the lack of clarity may be that the species-occupancy patterns that underlie diversity patterns in fragmented landscapes have often been overlooked [Prugh et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:20770–20775, 2008; Ovaskainen and Hanski, Ecol. Lett. 6:903–909, 2003]. The patch-occupancy metapopulation paradigm, despite its simplicity, has proved successful in developing some understanding of how habitat destruction affects the local flora and fauna. We shall review and derive some results arising from this approach for single species, for competitive and mutualistic communities, for predator-prey systems and food chains, and finally for a simple food web, a predator interacting with two competing prey. We show that although the outcome of habitat destruction in terms of species extinctions may be straightforward for the simplest models and communities, it may be subtly parameter-dependent and counter-intuitive with even a small increase in complexity. Progress towards a theory for more complex food webs [Leibold et al., Ecol. Lett. 7:601–613, 2004; Leibold and Miller, From metapopulations to metacommunities (2004); Pillai et al., Theor. Ecol. 3:223–237, 2010] will be difficult until we have a thorough understanding of these basic building blocks.

Keywords

  • Local Extinction
  • Habitat Destruction
  • Basic Reproduction Number
  • Good Competitor
  • Insect Pollinator

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. W.C. Allee, Animal Aggregations: A Study in General Sociology (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1931)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Amarasekare, Spatial dynamics of foodwebs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 479–500 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Baillie, C. Hilton-Taylor, S.N. Stuart, 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: A Global Assessment (International Union for Conservation of Nature, Cambridge, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bascompte, R.V. Solé, Effects of habitat destruction in a prey–predator metapopulation model. J. Theor. Biol. 195, 383–393 (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. N.F. Britton, N.R. Franks, G.P. Boswell, Dispersal and conservation in heterogeneous landscapes, in Insect Movement: Mechanisms and Consequences, ed. by I.P. Woiwod, D.R. Reynolds, C.D. Thomas (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 2001), pp. 299–320

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.M. Brooks et al., Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 16, 909–923 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. S.H.M. Butchart et al., Global biodiversity: indicators of recent decline. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Calcagno, N. Mouquet, P. Jarne, P. David, Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition–colonization trade-off is not dead. Ecol. Lett. 9, 897–907 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Calcagno, F. Massol, N. Mouquet, P. Jarne, P. David, Constraints on food chain length arising from regional metacommunity dynamics. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 3042–3049 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. L.-L. Chen, Z.-S. Lin, The effect of habitat destruction on metapopulations with an Allee-like effect: a study case of Yancheng in Jiangsu Province, China. Ecol. Model. 213, 356–364 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. J.H. Connell, Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302–1310 (1978)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. D.L. DeAngelis, Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs (Chapman and Hall, London, 1992)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. D.M. Debinski, R.D. Holt, A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv. Biol. 14, 342–355 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. F.A.S. Dos Santos, M.I.S. Costa, A correct formulation for a spatially implicit predator–prey metacommunity model. Math. Biosci. 223, 79–82 (2010)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. M.A. Fortuna, J. Bascompte, Habitat loss and the structure of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Ecol. Lett. 9, 281–286 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Gravel, N. Mouquet, M. Loreau, F. Guichard, Patch dynamics, persistence, and species coexistence in metaecosystems. Am. Nat. 176, 289–302 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Gravel, E. Canard, F. Guichard, N. Mouquet, Persistence increases with diversity and connectance in trophic metacommunities. PLoS ONE 6(5), e19374 (2011). doi:10:1371/journal.pone.0019374

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Hanski, Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment. Ecology 64, 493–500 (1983)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. I. Hanski, Metapopulation Ecology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Hanski, Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. AMBIO 40, 248–255 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. I. Hanski, O.E. Gaggiotti (eds.), Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations (Elsevier Academic, San Diego, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin, Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution (Academic, San Diego, 1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Hansson, L. Fahrig, G. Merriam (eds.), Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes (Springer, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Hastings, Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Popul. Biol. 18, 363–373 (1980)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Hastings, Population dynamics in patchy environments, in Modeling and Differential Equations in Biology, ed. by T.A. Burton (Dekker, New York, 1980), pp. 217–223

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.D. Holt, Consequences of spatial heterogeneity, in Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, ed. by I. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin (Academic, San Diego, 1997), pp. 149–164

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Holyoak, M.A. Leibold, R.D. Holt (eds.), Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. C.B. Huffaker, Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Kareiva, V. Wennergren, Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population process. Nature 373, 299–302 (1995)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. C.A. Klausmeier, Extinction in multispecies and spatially explicit models of habitat destruction. Am. Nat. 152, 303–310 (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. C.A. Klausmeier, Habitat destruction and extinction in competitive and mutualistic communities. Ecol. Lett. 4, 57–63 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. M.J. Labrum, Allee effects and extinction debt. Ecol. Model. 222, 1205–1207 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Lande, Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. Am. Nat. 130, 624–635 (1987)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. M.A. Leibold, T.E. Miller, From metapopulations to metacommunities, in Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations, ed. by I. Hanski, O.E. Gaggiotti (Elsevier Academic, San Diego, 2004), pp. 133–150

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. M.A. Leibold et al., The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 601–613 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. R. Levins, Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237–240 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Levins, D. Culver, Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68, 1246–1248 (1971)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Loreau, Does functional redundancy exist? Oikos 104, 606–611 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. R.H. MacArthur, E.O. Wilson, The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  40. A.E. Magurran, Ecological Diversity and its Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. R.M. May, The effects of spatial scale on ecological questions and answers, in Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology, ed. by P.J. Edwards, R.M. May, N.R. Webb (Blackwell Scientific Press, Oxford, 1994), pp. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  42. C.J. Melian, J. Bascompte, Food web structure and habitat loss. Ecol. Lett. 5, 37–46 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  43. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Morozov, B.-L. Li, Abundance patterns in multi-species communities exposed to habitat destruction. J. Theor. Biol. 251, 593–605 (2008); 253, 628 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. N. Mouquet, M. Loreau, Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat. 159, 420–426 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. N. Mouquet, B. Matthiessen, T. Miller, A. Gonzalez, Extinction debt in source–sink metacommunities. PLoS One 6(3), e17567 (2011). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017567

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. Nee, R.M. May, Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40 (1992)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  48. S. Nee, R.M. May, M.P. Hassell, Two-species metapopulation models, in Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, ed. by I. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin (Academic, San Diego, 1997), pp. 123–147

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  49. R.M. Nisbet, W.S.C. Gurney, Modelling Fluctuating Populations (Wiley, Chichester, 1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. O. Ovaskainen, I. Hanski, The species–area relationship derived from species-specific incidence functions. Ecol. Lett. 6, 903–909 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  51. O. Ovaskainen, I. Hanski, Metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented habitats, in Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations, ed. by I. Hanski, O.E. Gaggiotti (Elsevier Academic, San Diego, 2004), pp. 73–103

    Google Scholar 

  52. R.T. Paine, S.A. Levin, Intertidal landscapes: disturbances and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol. Monogr. 51, 145–178 (1981)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  53. E.C. Pielou, Ecological Diversity (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  54. P. Pillai, M. Loreau, A. Gonzalez, A patch-dynamic framework for food web metacommunities. Theor. Ecol. 3, 223–237 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  55. S. Prakash, A.M. de Roos, Habitat destruction in a simple predator–prey patch model: how predators enhance prey persistence and abundance. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 153–163 (2004)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. S. Prakash, A.M. de Roos, Habitat destruction in mutualistic metacommunities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 153–163 (2004)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. L.R. Prugh, K.E. Hodges, A.R.E. Sinclair, J.S. Brashares, Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20770–20775 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  58. K.L. Ryall, L. Fahrig, Response of predators to loss and fragmentation of prey habitat: a review of theory. Ecology 87, 1086–1093 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  59. M. Slatkin, Competition and regional coexistence. Ecology 55, 128–134 (1974)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  60. R.K. Swihart, Z. Feng, N.A. Slade, D.M. Mason, T.M. Gehring, Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator–prey metapopulation model. J. Theor. Biol. 210, 287–303 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  61. D. Tilman, Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75, 2–16 (1994)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  62. D. Tilman, R.M. May, C.L. Lehman, M.A. Nowak, Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66 (1994)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  63. D.S. Wilson, Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology 73, 1984–2000 (1992)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  64. World Wildlife Fund, Insight into Europe’s Forest Protection (WWF, Gland, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  65. D.W. Yu, H.B. Wilson, The competition–colonization trade-off is dead: long live the competition–colonization trade-off. Am. Nat. 158, 49–63 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  66. S.-R. Zhou, C.-Z. Liu, G. Wang, The competitive dynamics of metapopulations subject to the Allee-like effect. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 29–37 (2004)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick F. Britton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Britton, N.F. (2013). Destruction and Diversity: Effects of Habitat Loss on Ecological Communities. In: Lewis, M., Maini, P., Petrovskii, S. (eds) Dispersal, Individual Movement and Spatial Ecology. Lecture Notes in Mathematics(), vol 2071. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35497-7_11

Download citation