Advertisement

The Relevance of ComputationIrreducibility as ComputationUniversality in Economics

  • K. Vela Velupillai
Part of the Emergence, Complexity and Computation book series (ECC, volume 2)

Abstract

Stephen Wolfram’s A New Kind of Science [26] should have made a greater impact in economics—at least in its theorising and computational modes—than it seems to have. There are those who subscribe to varieties of agent-based modelling, who do refer to Wolfram’s paradigms–a word I use with the utmost trepidation–whenever simulational exercises within a framework of cellular automata is invoked to make claims on complexity, emergence, holism, reduction and many such ‘buzz words’. Very few of these exercises, and their practitioners, seem to be aware of the deep mathematical–and even metamathematical–underpinnings of Wolfram’s innovative concepts, particularly of computational equivalence and computational irreducibility in the works of Turing and Ulam. Some threads of these foundational underpinnings are woven together to form a possible tapestry for economic theorising and modelling in computable modes.

Keywords

Computational equivalence computational irreducibility computation universality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beeson, M.J.: Foundations of Constructive Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper, N.G. (ed.): From Cardinals to Chaos - Reflections on the Life and Legacy of Stanislaw Ulam. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foley, D.K.: Unholy Trinity: Labor, Capital and Land in the New Economy: The Graz Schumpeter Lectures. Routledge, London (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kao, Y.-F., Ragupathy, V., Velupillai, K.V., Zambelli, S.: Noncomputability, Unpredictability, Undecidability and Unsolvability in Economic & Finance Theories. Complexity (forthcoming, 2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kemeny, J.G.: The Use of Simplicity in Induction. Philosophical Review LXII, 391–408 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, M., Vitanyi, P.: An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc. (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore, C., Mertens, S.: The Nature of Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1972)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simon, H.A.: Reason in Human Affairs. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Regis (ed.): Who Got Einstein’s Office: Eccentricity and Genius at the Institute for Advanced Study. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1987)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Velupillai, K.V.: Computable Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Velupillai, K.V.: The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of Mathematics in Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25(6), 849–872 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Velupillai, K.V.: The Impossibility of an Effective Theory of Policy in a Complex Economy. In: Salzano, M., Colander, D. (eds.) Complexity Hints for Economic Policy, pp. 273–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolfram, S.: A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Vela Velupillai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics/ASSRUUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations